One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
198 Democrats V**e Against Republicans' E******n Integrity Bill
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 10, 2024 20:12:51   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.

Reply
Jul 10, 2024 20:38:54   #
Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)


Of course they want to c***t.
They HAVE TO c***t.

Reply
Jul 10, 2024 20:52:38   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)


In Minnesota in 2008, Al Franken won by slightly over 300 v**es out of nearly 3 million cast. There were more than 1000 allegations of v***r f***d, and 113 were actually prosecuted. This in a Democrat state with a Democrat Board of E******ns.
Not long before that, the Washington gubernatorial race was decided by less than 500 v**es out of around 3 million cast, and although there were no massive allegations of fraud, it was a razor thin margin.
In 2020, Biden's actual margin of victory was 43,000 v**es spread over five swing states, out of around 160 million cast. In GA, he won by less than 11,000 out of 5 million. It doesn't take much fraud to swing an e******n. Sometimes, like in Washington state, it doesn't take much even without fraud.
I might add that Ratburger, or rather, Raffensberger, our GA Sec/State, was poised to allow almost 8000 illegally registered v**ers before he got caught and was forced to disallow them.

Reply
 
 
Jul 10, 2024 21:21:02   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)


I wish I could be surprised by this; however, I cannot.

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 02:52:59   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)


We have the Republican side now read the Democrat side . There are two sides of American citizens and both sides should matter not just one and one alone .

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 06:01:01   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
We have the Republican side now read the Democrat side . There are two sides of American citizens and both sides should matter not just one and one alone .


Why don't you explain your reasons for opposing this e******n reform bill? I would love to hear a rational explanation of the Democrats position. Please don't simply rely on the lame excuse that it is an attempt to discourage "minority v****g". That dog doesn't hunt anymore!

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 06:14:09   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
ACP45 wrote:
Why don't you explain your reasons for opposing this e******n reform bill? I would love to hear a rational explanation of the Democrats position. Please don't simply rely on the lame excuse that it is an attempt to discourage "minority v****g". That dog doesn't hunt anymore!


Did I say it was about discouaging minority v****g ? No I did not -- Tell me who has their birth certificate readily available ? Tell me why the bill is necessary when there are already laws against non citizens v****g .

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2024 06:48:47   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Did I say it was about discouaging minority v****g ? No I did not -- Tell me who has their birth certificate readily available ? Tell me why the bill is necessary when there are already laws against non citizens v****g .


You need a copy of your birth certificate to get a drivers license or passport, correct? People have 3.5 months to get a copy if they don't readily have one on file.

While it may be "technically illegal" for i*****l i*******ts to v**e in a "Federal E******n", most state laws allow driver licenses (now issued to i*****l i*******ts), utility bills, bank statements, etc. to v**e in a FEDERAL E******N.

"To be clear, federal law and the laws of all 50 states require people to be U.S. citizens in order to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns, and federal law forbids people from falsely claiming citizenship to r******r to v**e. Penalties for lying about this include up to five years in prison. However, enforcement mechanisms for such laws are limited, and opportunities to get around them are ample.

The situation was summarized by President Barack Obama shortly before the 2016 U.S. p**********l e******n when actress Gina Rodriguez asked him whether “Dreamers” and “undocumented citizens” would be deported if they v**ed. President Obama replied:

“Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you v**e, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the v****g rolls somehow are t***sferred over, and people start investigating, et cetera.”

After dodging the fact that “Dreamers” and “undocumented immigrants” are not citizens, President Obama’s clear message was that there is no effective way to enforce the law that prohibits them from v****g.


Now, does this answer your question?

https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/HAVA%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf#page=2









Reply
Jul 11, 2024 07:07:36   #
Liberty Tree
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Did I say it was about discouaging minority v****g ? No I did not -- Tell me who has their birth certificate readily available ? Tell me why the bill is necessary when there are already laws against non citizens v****g .


Making a law and enforcing it are too different things.

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 08:12:55   #
Radiance3
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)

===================
Democrats are champions of fraud and c***ting in every e******n. I believe that the only way they win e******ns are via e******n f***d. Until now so many ways have been discovered how they committed various e******n f***d to win. One of them was the i*****l a***ns were allowed to v**e for democrats. Until now so many 2020 e******n f***ds have been discovered. I think Biden did not win the 2020 e******n.

A week ago, I sent message to Speaker Johnson, and Congressman Jim Jordan, to stop i*****l a***ns from v****g. It is unconstitutional and it disenfranchises the US citizens of their hard-earned constitutional rights to v**e and choose their elected leaders. Those rights were stated in our Declaration of Independence.

I*****l a***ns have NO rights to v**e. They don't even have rights to stay in this country.

When i******s v**e, they commit crimes against the American citizens. Here are the various crimes i******s commit against the American citizens when they are allowed to v**e by the democrats.

1. It disenfranchises the citizens v**es. It denies us to choose our elected leaders because we don't win the e******n, like the 2020 and many other e******ns.

2. We the people work very hard to paying taxes to fund this government system.

3. We the people put up our lives, and families lives, and sacrifices fighting in battle to protect our country.

But the democrat thieves steal all of these sacrifices from us. So, they control power and corrupt the wealth of the country that we earned and paid.

4. Americans have served this land the rest of our lives, for better or for worst, we served, to protect our freedom.


The Democrats are very corrupt, dishonest, dirty, violent, immoral, greedy.

These various crimes got worst under Barack Obama who've lied and violated the constitution several times to run the government.

It was also that times when DEI, CRT, WOKE started. Even used in the military.

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 10:06:12   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
ACP45 wrote:
You need a copy of your birth certificate to get a drivers license or passport, correct? People have 3.5 months to get a copy if they don't readily have one on file.

While it may be "technically illegal" for i*****l i*******ts to v**e in a "Federal E******n", most state laws allow driver licenses (now issued to i*****l i*******ts), utility bills, bank statements, etc. to v**e in a FEDERAL E******N.

"To be clear, federal law and the laws of all 50 states require people to be U.S. citizens in order to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns, and federal law forbids people from falsely claiming citizenship to r******r to v**e. Penalties for lying about this include up to five years in prison. However, enforcement mechanisms for such laws are limited, and opportunities to get around them are ample.

The situation was summarized by President Barack Obama shortly before the 2016 U.S. p**********l e******n when actress Gina Rodriguez asked him whether “Dreamers” and “undocumented citizens” would be deported if they v**ed. President Obama replied:

“Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you v**e, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the v****g rolls somehow are t***sferred over, and people start investigating, et cetera.”

After dodging the fact that “Dreamers” and “undocumented immigrants” are not citizens, President Obama’s clear message was that there is no effective way to enforce the law that prohibits them from v****g.


Now, does this answer your question?

https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/HAVA%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf#page=2
You need a copy of your birth certificate to get a... (show quote)


That is a lot of information . I do not know any non citizens who v**e and I know plenty of citizens who do not v**e . have v**ed since I was 18 and always do in every state local and federal e******n .-- I win some I lose some and always took it as it came without claiming v***r f***d . This seems to be a recent phenomenon---

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2024 11:10:30   #
Justice101
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)


The Dumbocrats can't win unless they c***t!

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 13:38:28   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Did I say it was about discouaging minority v****g ? No I did not -- Tell me who has their birth certificate readily available ? Tell me why the bill is necessary when there are already laws against non citizens v****g .


There are laws against smuggling f******l, and crossing the border illegally. How's that working out? Unenforced laws mean nothing.

Reply
Jul 11, 2024 13:39:16   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
That is a lot of information . I do not know any non citizens who v**e and I know plenty of citizens who do not v**e . have v**ed since I was 18 and always do in every state local and federal e******n .-- I win some I lose some and always took it as it came without claiming v***r f***d . This seems to be a recent phenomenon---


Everyone, check out the video on the latest effort to combat e******n f***d, "Fractal"! The leftest NGO's have taken b****t harvesting/fraud to a whole new level. Finally, a system that will enable this c***ting to be caught!

Fractal is a new technology stack capable of searching dirty data. It's capable of finding f**e phone numbers, t***sient addresses, missing street addresses, people claiming shopping centers or PO boxes as their residential address, etc..

After looking at 25 states, a team using the Fractal tech stack found that elected officials are modifying v**er rolls to favor candidates. For example Fractal found that e******n officials during the Kari Lake e******n changed the zip codes of 30,000 people just before mail-in b****ts went out.

They also deliberately fatten v**er rolls with names and addresses that don't match, creating thousands of f**e v**ers that will receive mail-in b****ts. In WI, they found thousands of people with the same phone number in the v**er rolls.

Take a moment to watch the videos, your mind will be blown.
https://www.omega4america.com/videos/

https://www.omega4america.com/how-to-track-illegal-alien-v**ers/









Reply
Jul 11, 2024 16:07:44   #
martsiva
 
ACP45 wrote:
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, the Democrats - en masse - v**ed against Speaker Johnson's bill and therefore for 'c***ting' in the e******n.

🚨 BREAKING: Almost every single Democrat just v**ed to *protect* the ability of i*****l a***ns to v**e in our e******ns. pic.twitter.com/MBuXqoCn4U

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 10, 2024
We would be interested to see who the five Democrats that v**ed for law and order and e******n integrity were though.

Hakeem Jeffries labels the SAVE Act as the “Extreme MAGA Republican V**er Suppression Bill."

This wholesale rejection of common sense merely exposes the Democrats' not so cunning plan during the e******n and into the future.

Jeffries frames the bill as being designed to cover for a Trump loss in the 2024 e******n, and somehow ties a bill that makes it harder for non-citizens to v**e to J****** 6.

Where do we even start.

Here’s what in the SAVE Act, and what Jeffries is really against:

Require proof of US citizenship to r******r to v**e in federal e******ns

Prevent non-citizens who receive drivers’ licenses from registering to v**e

Require states to acquire documentary proof of US citizenship in person when registering to v**e

Require states to establish a process for applicants who do not have documentary proof of US citizenship, but are US citizens

Require states to remove non-citizens from their v**er rolls, with free access to federal and state databases with citizenship information

Provide states with resources to remove non-citizens form their v**er rolls

There is only one reason to oppose this legislation.

You want to c***t.
Update (1830ET): Just as expected, b the Democrat... (show quote)


They couldn`t be more obvious about it!!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.