Tid-bit two; for those that care :-)
And those that missed this one:
It covers the complicity of both party hacks in both political parties, and the mess US foreign policy has created.
IMO - should be saved and shared.
McCain is a CFR stooge:
Who here has followed what has happened in Libya since US put the rebels in charge there?
Our soldiers now have to fight US armaments, ammo, and machinery.
Was Johny McStooge that misinformed?
Did GOP leaders know of al-Qaida affiliation
On April 22, 2011, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., publicly called for support of Libyas rebels in their r*******n to oust Gadhafi.
They are my heroes, McCain told reporters as he out of a hotel in B******i after having toured a rebel stronghold, NBCs Richard Engel reported.
Engel said that McCain, one of the strongest proponents in Congress of the U.S. military intervention in Libya, said he planned to meet with the rebel National T***sition Council, the de-facto government in the eastern half of the country.
NBC further reported McCain said at a news conference Friday that all nations should recognize the council as the legitimate voice of the Libyan people.
Engel quoted McCain saying: I would encourage every nation, especially the United States, to recognize the T***sitional National Council as the legitimate voice of the Libyan people.
On May 2, 2011, after being informed privately by a phone call from the White House in advance of Obamas nationally televised announcement that Osama Bin Laden had been k**led by U.S. Special Forces operating in Pakistan, House Speaker John Boehner put out a statement.
This is great news for the security of the American people and a victory in our continued fight against al-Qaida and radical extremism around the world, Boehner said.
Papered silent with security agreements
Shipp explained both Republican and Democratic White Houses require the Gang of Eight to sign secrecy agreements before receiving classified administration briefings on foreign policy and intelligence matters.
The White House papers everybody briefed in Congress with secrecy agreements, he said. This agreement threatens the possibility of criminal prosecution if any classified information is leaked to the public in an unauthorized fashion.
He noted a member of the House or Senate could be removed from office for violation of the agreement.
These agreements are powerful instruments of persuasion.
Shipp questioned whether the B******i gun-running operation was classified above top secret, meaning Boehner and the other GOP members would face severe penalties, including the possibility of criminal prosecution, if any leaked the information.
Or, he asked, was it possible the GOP leadership believed Obama signing of the P**********l Finding on March 29, 2011, authorizing the CIA to support the Libyan rebels would have implied his approval of the gun-running activities subsequently undertaken by the CIA in conjunction with the State Department?
Shipp acknowledged that a criminal or, even worse, a t*****rous White House could use the secrecy agreements to ensure silence.
Unfortunately, that could happen, he said. If the CIA wants to conceal an operation, they classify it at a very high level and they paper Congress with a secrecy agreement such that you are bound for life.
Shipp emphasized how ironclad the CIA-executed secrecy agreements were.
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/admiral-u-s-could-have-ousted-gadhafi-peacefully/#zvcfaObj6Jot...