Dissent or Terror
Jun 24, 2013 15:12:30 #
http://www.prwatch.org/files/Dissent%20or%20Terror%20FINAL_0.pdf
Some of you may not get past the heading of this report without tossing it out because it conflicts with your social conditioning but for any free-thinkers that remain unaffiliated, the significance of the matter will be easy to see. This report presents evidence that the anti-terrorist facilities established during the years following 09/11/2001, in conjunction with corporate interests, have been used to monitor and control American dissenters, most notably the Occupy Wall Street movements.
Some of you may already know how I feel about the USA PATRIOT Act and the short-sighted attitude among many Americans that it's not a problem as long as you aren't a terrorist. My argument is that despite the drastic denial of constitutional rights for terrorists, there is no solid definition anywhere in that law that qualifies what a terrorist is. This report illustrates how this ambiguity creates a serious problem for any Americans with an inclination to stand up for themselves, especially if they also have the ability to recognize the true threats to our freedom.
Some of you may not get past the heading of this report without tossing it out because it conflicts with your social conditioning but for any free-thinkers that remain unaffiliated, the significance of the matter will be easy to see. This report presents evidence that the anti-terrorist facilities established during the years following 09/11/2001, in conjunction with corporate interests, have been used to monitor and control American dissenters, most notably the Occupy Wall Street movements.
Some of you may already know how I feel about the USA PATRIOT Act and the short-sighted attitude among many Americans that it's not a problem as long as you aren't a terrorist. My argument is that despite the drastic denial of constitutional rights for terrorists, there is no solid definition anywhere in that law that qualifies what a terrorist is. This report illustrates how this ambiguity creates a serious problem for any Americans with an inclination to stand up for themselves, especially if they also have the ability to recognize the true threats to our freedom.
Jun 24, 2013 16:08:09 #
Interesting, but way too long to hold everyone's interest. You should find a way to shorten it. It would benefit all parties if you would do this.
Jun 24, 2013 17:23:04 #
Navysnipe wrote:
Interesting, but way too long to hold everyone's interest. You should find a way to shorten it. It would benefit all parties if you would do this.
Yeah, you're right. I'll see what I can do.
Jun 25, 2013 08:21:13 #
Yes it is way to long. I just don't say anything over the internet that I would not gladly shout from the roof tops--on the assumption that anything said on the internet is shouted from the roof tops. Non-profits laugh at the anti-terrorist disclaimer they are required to sign for many grants--like how is anybody outside the national security alphabet soup supposed to be able to tell the difference between a terrorist and any ordinary person.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.