One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump Says A******n Should Be Left to the States!
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Apr 10, 2024 09:59:48   #
Ready player 1
 
WinkyTink wrote:
Since you asked, a******n is not a problem. I frankly love a******n. It is a good way to reduce the number of progressives on the streets. Everybody should have one, they are grrrreat! Dead babies can take care of themselves. Oh Alice!


Your a very sick individual. Quite frankly I didn't ask. I was replying to Radiance3. Winky Tink is it? Seems you have a small winky. πŸ˜‰ I Tink 🀣🀣🀣

Reply
Apr 10, 2024 13:33:09   #
WinkyTink Loc: Hill Country, TX
 
Ready player 1 wrote:
Your a very sick individual. Quite frankly I didn't ask. I was replying to Radiance3. Winky Tink is it? Seems you have a small winky. πŸ˜‰ I Tink 🀣🀣🀣


Well, yes my winky turned black and fell off from lack of use, the stub is quite small. Try for a second, to see my absurd point as a mechanism to demonstrate the obscene pro-a******n, anytime up to birth crowd how ridiculous their arguments are..... oh and laugh a little.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 02:47:33   #
Ready player 1
 
WinkyTink wrote:
Well, yes my winky turned black and fell off from lack of use, the stub is quite small. Try for a second, to see my absurd point as a mechanism to demonstrate the obscene pro-a******n, anytime up to birth crowd how ridiculous their arguments are..... oh and laugh a little.


I'm so sorry you didn't take your problem in hand, it might have helped your situation. πŸ˜‡ As for your absurd point πŸ€” do you think I would condone said action? Personally I don't condone any of it. But I don't live in the shoe's and make decisions for those women. It was the democrats idea to say you can have an a******n up to and including until the baby was crowning. That's d********g! Why would the government condone that? T-cells, body parts? Having Row V Wade reversed put an end to the absurdly of it all. But then that created some real problems for those women who really needed that sort of treatment. Those decisions should be between the doctor and his or her patients and the Dr not be sent to jail. Here is an example. Let's say your 1/2 way through your pregnancy and you find out your baby is brain dead and won't last but a few minutes after birth. What would you do? Your wife can be septic any time. Should someone else (government or insurance companies) dictate how best for you to deal with such a matter? If so why? Does it affect those people who are not having to deal with such a dilemma? Should those people really need to have a say so? I think not. 12 weeks use to be the cut off for having an a******n. It's quite possible if that hadn't changed we would not be having this conversation. What are your thoughts?

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2024 09:51:16   #
WinkyTink Loc: Hill Country, TX
 
Ready player 1 wrote:
I'm so sorry you didn't take your problem in hand, it might have helped your situation. πŸ˜‡ As for your absurd point πŸ€” do you think I would condone said action? Personally I don't condone any of it. But I don't live in the shoe's and make decisions for those women. It was the democrats idea to say you can have an a******n up to and including until the baby was crowning. That's d********g! Why would the government condone that? T-cells, body parts? Having Row V Wade reversed put an end to the absurdly of it all. But then that created some real problems for those women who really needed that sort of treatment. Those decisions should be between the doctor and his or her patients and the Dr not be sent to jail. Here is an example. Let's say your 1/2 way through your pregnancy and you find out your baby is brain dead and won't last but a few minutes after birth. What would you do? Your wife can be septic any time. Should someone else (government or insurance companies) dictate how best for you to deal with such a matter? If so why? Does it affect those people who are not having to deal with such a dilemma? Should those people really need to have a say so? I think not. 12 weeks use to be the cut off for having an a******n. It's quite possible if that hadn't changed we would not be having this conversation. What are your thoughts?
I'm so sorry you didn't take your problem in hand,... (show quote)


I mostly agree with you. Limiting non -health, rape or incest a******ns to inside the the first trimester worked reasonably well for 50 years (except for the dead babies). Then….. the left wanted it extended without limit and the religious right wanted it stopped in totality. A negotiation destined to fail.
Absolutism never works for a population as large as ours. What does work is you do what’s right for you. Support your way, live your convictions and encourage others to see the light. The trick is to let the other guys die for their beliefs, not lose the entire battle.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.