America Is Much Less Conservative than the Mainstream Media Believe
Jun 22, 2013 00:45:57 #
Jun 22, 2013 19:42:29 #
OPP Newsletter wrote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/media/news/2013/06/20/67387/america-is-much-less-conservative-than-the-mainstream-media-believe/
Quid Pro Quo, OPP Newsletter: Nothing in your cited article convinces me that MSMBC's Scarborough is wrong with the opposite statement of your Title, thus:
"MSNBCs Joe Scarborough is among many in the media and elsewhere who like to, as he says, warn [their] friends in Manhattan and Washington and LA and in the mainstream media that America is much more conservative than they believe it to be.
Free out on the Kansas range
Jun 22, 2013 22:35:40 #
OPP Newsletter wrote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/media/news/2013/06/20/67387/america-is-much-less-conservative-than-the-mainstream-media-believe/
Jun 23, 2013 03:58:38 #
We would not have to endure this if people would refuse to participate in polls.
For every poll which says one thing, another poll could be issued saying the opposite. It is based on how a question is phrased; what time of day the call is made; how many people were polled, and the se******n process for the participants.
For every poll which says one thing, another poll could be issued saying the opposite. It is based on how a question is phrased; what time of day the call is made; how many people were polled, and the se******n process for the participants.
Jun 23, 2013 04:27:40 #
Polls are a liberal conspiracy. Fact-checker sites are a liberal conspiracy. Institutions trusted for a hundred years by both parties are now part of a liberal conspiracy. Faux News is the only thing to trust, along with Right Wing conspiracy blogs.
Is Obama a conservative? Does that explain why he got elected, a conservative base? On every question nationally polled, such as gay marriage, a******n, and taxes, the vast majority of Americans have an opinion that is not conservative. It is overwhelmingly against the Republican Platform.
Is Obama a conservative? Does that explain why he got elected, a conservative base? On every question nationally polled, such as gay marriage, a******n, and taxes, the vast majority of Americans have an opinion that is not conservative. It is overwhelmingly against the Republican Platform.
Jun 23, 2013 04:33:33 #
rumitoid wrote:
Polls are a liberal conspiracy. Fact-checker sites... (show quote)
Perhaps you should let the 28 state legislatures and 12 governors elected in November,who are Republicans, know that the people who v**ed for them are "overwhelmingly against" them.
Jun 23, 2013 04:41:26 #
Perhaps you should look into the gerrymandering that made that possible. Democrats get more v**es overall than republicans in those e******ns but lose because of re-districting by the Right.
Do you believe any of the national polls?
Do you believe any of the national polls?
Jun 23, 2013 04:46:26 #
rumitoid wrote:
Perhaps you should look into the gerrymandering that made that possible. Democrats get more v**es overall than republicans in those e******ns but lose because of re-districting by the Right.
Do you believe any of the national polls?
Do you believe any of the national polls?
I pay ZERO, ZIP AND NADA to ANY POLL!
Excuse me, we are not talking national e******ns. We are talking state e******ns. It is your contention that 28 states totally gerrymandered the entire state just so entire legislatures could be predominantly Republican. You are telling me 12 states totally gerrymandered to elect 12 Republican governors. Obviously you started drinking again.
Jun 23, 2013 04:59:02 #
Lol, look it up, auntiE. Yet even if this does not totally explain Red victories in state legislatures and governorships, as well as the House, polls by various persuasions show that the Republican Platform is in the minority. The vast majority want gun-control, gay marriage, a******n, and an end to casual war.
Jun 23, 2013 09:03:37 #
AuntiE wrote:
I pay ZERO, ZIP AND NADA to ANY POLL!
Excuse me, we are not talking national e******ns. We are talking state e******ns. It is your contention that 28 states totally gerrymandered the entire state just so entire legislatures could be predominantly Republican. You are telling me 12 states totally gerrymandered to elect 12 Republican governors. Obviously you started drinking again.
Excuse me, we are not talking national e******ns. We are talking state e******ns. It is your contention that 28 states totally gerrymandered the entire state just so entire legislatures could be predominantly Republican. You are telling me 12 states totally gerrymandered to elect 12 Republican governors. Obviously you started drinking again.
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: I think states can only redistrict every 10 years. That's how we do it in Kansas anyway. p.s. You're fencing with a fence post. Just sayin.
Jun 23, 2013 09:09:16 #
[quote=rumitoid] Is Obama a conservative? Crawl back into your hole toady, your brain is fried. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
On the Hunt of brain dead toadies, liberals, socialist, and other varmints and vermin
Jun 23, 2013 09:45:13 #
rumitoid wrote:
Perhaps you should look into the gerrymandering that made that possible. Democrats get more v**es overall than republicans in those e******ns but lose because of re-districting by the Right.
Do you believe any of the national polls?
Do you believe any of the national polls?
On the contrary the most gerrymandered districts are indeed Democrat controlled cities and metropolitian areas.
The reason Democrats seem to get more v**es because there are more people in heavy urban districts yet there are much more "red" demographics spread out over rural parts of the country. It's the variables of what is easy access and how gerrymandered a district is.
You've been hitting the bottle again haven't you?
Jun 23, 2013 09:55:01 #
Democrat get more v**e simple with fraud, was fix machine where any one v**e for (R) but send a v**e for (D),black intimidate v**er in a poll, many v**e more of one time, i******s go v**e to, but real in another State I don't but in OH, Cleveland I know well, I live here, like Cuyahoga who dems said is blue, is not real true, maybe 40 to 45 % yes but majority are red. Accept one thing, Dems can't win if not use a fraud. We Governor now Kasick is a good guy, but Dems won win next e******n, but I don't thing have enough support that time.
Jun 23, 2013 10:01:54 #
Hora wrote:
Democrat get more v**e simple with fraud, was fix ... (show quote)
Quid Pro Quo, Hora: In the 2012 e******n, it was reported that there was over a 100 districts around Cleveland in which Obama got 99% of the v**e and Romney received only 1%. Do you suspect fraud was involved? And, is this an issue in Cleveland where you live? And, if so, what is happening? Tell us about it. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 23, 2013 10:02:18 #
Hora wrote:
Democrat get more v**e simple with fraud, was fix ... (show quote)
There won't be a next time...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.