Eric Holder rolls over Congress . . . . . . . Again: Ah yes, he surely did do that yesterday. He didn't want to speak any t***h so he asked to be allowed to answer in a letter, again...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Ah yes, he surely did do that yesterday. He didn't want to speak any t***h so he asked to be allowed to answer in a letter, again, and also got them to agree to meeting with him with leaders of the committee only. I suppose that is to make sure that only a certain kind of questions hit him. You know, like avoiding Trey Gowdy and others like him. This is to say that committee chairmen tend to be more establishment and less likely to pound him for t***h.

ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa

yes

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

ldsuttonjr wrote:

yes

Is it not a shame that he continually gets by with that?

Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts

oldroy wrote:

Is it not a shame that he continually gets by with that?

What I think is, WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE!!!!!!!!?

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

oldroy wrote:

Ah yes, he surely did do that yesterday. He didn't want to speak any t***h so he asked to be allowed to answer in a letter, again, and also got them to agree to meeting with him with leaders of the committee only. I suppose that is to make sure that only a certain kind of questions hit him. You know, like avoiding Trey Gowdy and others like him. This is to say that committee chairmen tend to be more establishment and less likely to pound him for t***h.

Satan takes care of his own

2shoog

I can't find what it is that he did, I thought he was supposed to explain his lies ? but where?

2shoog

what did he do exactly??? I can't find anything...I thought he was supposed to explain his lies on the 19th? is there a link?

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

2shoog wrote:

what did he do exactly??? I can't find anything...I thought he was supposed to explain his lies on the 19th? is there a link?

He explained nothing to the committee but did agree to do so to the chairman and the ranking member in a closed door meeting.

You will have trouble covering up for the likes of him here although you are very welcome to try. Hang in there because there are some leaners here besides you.

2shoog

I don't know what a leaner is, but to be sure we are on the same page I h**e that man and think he looks like a rat. What committee? I looked on CSPAN but can't find it. I want to see his lying ass squirm. America has never had the likes of this administration but it's not just obama, it is the progressive liberals/socialists. obama is NOT the problem, he is the RESULT of the problems mentioned above!

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

2shoog wrote:

I don't know what a leaner is, but to be sure we are on the same page I h**e that man and think he looks like a rat. What committee? I looked on CSPAN but can't find it. I want to see his lying ass squirm. America has never had the likes of this administration but it's not just obama, it is the progressive liberals/socialists. obama is NOT the problem, he is the RESULT of the problems mentioned above!

Leaner is my shortened form of left leaner. If you aren't one of those then just forget I said that. It is so much easier to type leaner than it is progressive so I use that.

2shoog

Thank you for your reply. Could you please send me a link to what you saw or which committee? I've searched but NOTHING shows up about it. Was it on cspan? I had on my calender it was supposed to be on the 19th but on the forum here it seems it was on the 20th. I appreciate your help. Steven

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

2shoog wrote:

Thank you for your reply. Could you please send me a link to what you saw or which committee? I've searched but NOTHING shows up about it. Was it on cspan? I had on my calender it was supposed to be on the 19th but on the forum here it seems it was on the 20th. I appreciate your help. Steven

This is a link to what happened on May 30 after Holder had backed off once again. The committee refused to allow him to tell them a pile of Pelosi and then run home. Listen to this interview and you can see why he doesn't want to answer the committee's questions.

The other day he convinced the committee that he would write a letter and then meet with the two leaders of the committee, the chairman and the minority leader to talk with them. Of course, anybody could see that what he wanted to do was only have to snow two people instead of a whole committee. I can't find anything about what you are asking about but you can rest assured that he thinks he can wriggle out from those two much easier than with the whole committee.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2420113378001/house-judiciary-committee-demands-answers-from-holder/