One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Mail-In B****t Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won in 2020: Over one-in-four mail b****ts were likely cast fraudulently
Feb 12, 2024 16:25:05   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 16:41:48   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Parky60 wrote:
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.
i b A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challeng... (show quote)

The f********t e******n will be viewed merely as a small speed bump 50 years from now in Trump’s quest.

A four year delay in the trumpism is minor compared to what comes next. And is happening.

The land of opportunity for adherents.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 17:19:27   #
Doctor Dave Loc: Madisonville, Tx.
 
The e******n in 2020 was ofcourse fraudulent and therefore stolen. Then comes the question “who do we show the evidence to”?

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2024 17:33:51   #
David L Loc: Central Wisconsin
 
Doctor Dave wrote:
The e******n in 2020 was ofcourse fraudulent and therefore stolen. Then comes the question “who do we show the evidence to”?


The f**e news continues to say that there is no evidence of fraud.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 17:43:40   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
RascalRiley wrote:
The f********t e******n will be viewed merely as a small speed bump 50 years from now in Trump’s quest.

A four year delay in the trumpism is minor compared to what comes next. And is happening.

The land of opportunity for adherents.

I thought that you didn't reply to me anymore. I haven't missed your insipid comments attacking Trump but always given the evil Joe Biden a pass.

Reply
Feb 12, 2024 18:36:44   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Parky60 wrote:
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.
i b A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challeng... (show quote)


An interesting analysis and their conclusions are of course correct. And we all knew that 3 years ago.

Reply
Feb 13, 2024 04:07:06   #
DAV
 
Parky60 wrote:
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.

@
Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.
i b A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challeng... (show quote)


Obiden probably won't do any campaigning (he'll expose his incompetency) and this time instead of 81 million v**es, the D******n 'v****g machines' will probably say he got 91 million or 100 million 'v**es' ! And the mainstream media will say how great Obiden is, while the dumb ass Lie-berals will go along with the bs. If there's any consolation to this, we know the Lie-berals will be affected also by Demonocrat policies. They will suffer too with all the high prices of everything, AND THEY WILL LOSE JOBS TOO ! But, they are told to believe that all negative things are Trump's fault, and they'll say, OK ! SUFFER, YOU LIE-BERAL DEMONOCRATS ! SUFFER- YOU V**ED FOR THIS MISERY !!! I wonder if all the homeless people living on the sidewalks are separated by having Demonocrats live on one side of the street and Conservatives live on the other side of the street ?...NO, THEY SUFFER EQUALLY and it's all because of Demonocrat/complicit RINO policies. The Demonocrats cause ghost towns and homeless people. Quit being used by Demons. Don't be so stupid !

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2024 08:51:45   #
ed4short Loc: New Hampshire
 
Only in America.....Land of opportunity

Reply
Feb 13, 2024 11:20:25   #
Radiance3
 
Parky60 wrote:
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.
i b A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challeng... (show quote)

====================
We had seen several events people delivering bags and boxes of paper b****ts and dumped them at the collection sites. Some before the counting was finished, and some were after the counting. One of them a black woman confessed that she was paid to do it

T***p w*n 2947 Counties. Therefore, more delegates. Biden won 477 Counties, fewer delegates. Even when Biden got California and NY. But T***p w*n Florida and Texas.

Reply
Feb 13, 2024 14:31:56   #
Radiance3
 
Parky60 wrote:
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.
i b A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challeng... (show quote)

====================
Commentary:
I believe with these massive evidences coming out, the Marxist-Democrats stole the victory from Trump, and the v****g rights of the American people. In addition, not only stealing Trump's victory, but the Democrats also charged and prosecuted him for speaking that the 2020 e******n was r****d. His is denied of his Constitutional rights, the first Amendment.

In addition, they extorted so much money from him by assigning several black DA's and prosecutors to penalize him for saying that the e******n was r****d, using magnifying glass to charge him on various h**xes. E.g. NYC DA, and DA Willis in Atlanta, GA, along with Smith and Chutkan, at the DC.

There were 6 violations that the Democrats stole from Trump and the American people. Let us simplify them. Here we go.

With all the massive evidences coming out of the 2020 f********t e******n

1. I truly think that Trump's victory on the 2020 p**********l e******n was s****n from him.
2. Trump was charged, accused, and prosecuted of complaining and saying that the 2020 e******n was r****d.

3. Trump and his Team were penalized millions of dollars, and some locked up.

4. Trump has been consistently harassed due to his complaints about the r****d 2020 e******n. The J6th was complete fabrications to finally stop him.

5. Trump supporters were denied and disenfranchised of their v**es because they were stolen, depriving them of the 14th Amendment.

6. Trump has been consistently harassed, accused, mentally and physically abused, and humiliated, the fact that Trump, and his supporters have been the victims as well.

Now how did it end making Biden the winner in the e******n? We the people are all suffering, our national world security in peril, and our world reputation down to the ground. Our economy is down to the ground, and now we are engulfed with the highest national debts:

The national debt — which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors jumped to $34,172,829,341,468.41 trillion as of Jan 31, 2024.

Our Public-School children could not read and write, and could not do simple math, the fact that they are the highest funded among world countries yet tailing in all academic performances.

The handout supporters of Biden wanted him because of the wealth redistributions to buy their v**es. National Debts when Trump left was $26.5 trillion. Now for 3 years of Biden we have $34.17. Biden over expended $$7.57 trillion for just 3 years.

These debts incurred $650 billion interest expense as of 12/31/2023. This cost is incurred annually. And as debts grow the interest gets higher. These interests are credited to the lenders, the highest is Japan, second is China, and 3rd is in Europe. The 4th are the local bankers and private investors who bought the Federal securities.

If the e******n of Trump was not stolen, we won't be in these miserable conditions, along with no wars, and we are all proud.

America, please think! Prepare to rescue our country, because right now, we are losing our constitution, our country, our freedom, and most importantly our God.

Reply
Feb 13, 2024 14:56:46   #
pegw
 
Parky60 wrote:
A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.
i b A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challeng... (show quote)


I didn't waste my time on another propaganda piece about how T***p w*n the e******n. Al Gore never went the big lie route, because he was a gracious looser. Not a sore looser like America's favorite criminal.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2024 22:31:49   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
pegw wrote:
I didn't waste my time on another propaganda piece about how T***p w*n the e******n. Al Gore never went the big lie route, because he was a gracious looser. Not a sore looser like America's favorite criminal.


Yeah, it turned out that Gore was a looser.

Reply
Feb 18, 2024 22:53:46   #
Radiance3
 
[quote=Parky60]A new study of mail-in b****t fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 p**********l e******n.


Empty envelopes of opened v**e-by-mail b****ts for the p**********l primary are stacked on a table at King County E******ns in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts had in the 2020 e******n concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of v****g by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 e******n results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in v**ers admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the p**********l e******n.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in b****t fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in b****ts during the p******c, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 e******n been conducted like every national e******n has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of v**ers cast b****ts in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 v**es were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent v****g that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in v**ers engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 e******n, such as v****g in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who v**ed by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to v***r f***d.

“This means that more than one-in-four b****ts cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in b****t on behalf of another v**er if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in b****ts in the 2020 e******n, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in b****ts might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in b****ts on the overall 2020 e******n result.

First, the researchers analyzed the e*******l results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in b****t scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the e*******l results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent b****ts, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assessed, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent b****ts, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 v**e totals to generate a new estimate for v**e totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 e******n in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 e******n result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in b****t fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of b****ts cast.

Mail-in b****t fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden v**es that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the v**e tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 E*******l College v**es compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 E*******l College v**es, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have v**ed based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in b****t fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated v***r f***d by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in b****t fraud significantly impacted the 2020 p**********l e******n, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the authors of the Heartland study call for state legislatures to do all in their power to ensure the 2024 p**********l e******n is as secure as possible, mostly by severely limiting mail-in v****g and adopting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in v***r f***d.[/quote

================
[I] Here are the various b****t frauds committed.
Mail-in with no signature b****ts.
The D******n machines.
Boxes of b****ts were dumped in the collection sites at the middle of the night. The person caught said, she was paid to do it.
B****t harvesting.
Boxes filled with unsigned b****ts pulled out under the table at the middle of the night and counted.
I*****l a***ns v**ed for Biden. Many were caught. The were paid to do it.
Dead people v**ed.
Duplicate v****g.
County b****ts that were known GOP majority were tossed out by the Postal Service driver.
GOP watchers during the count were not allowed to get close.
Late b****ts were counted.[/i]

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.