AvJoe wrote:
The problem with the posts I have read has more to do with the absolute crap being generated.
As you are a new member and probably have not read many posts, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and try not to be too hard on you.
AvJoe wrote:
I am a new member and this is only my second post but allow me to suggest the following:
This is a forum where Freedom of Speech is King. You can say what you want here. Just remember, the First Amendment grants you the right to say what you want. It DOES NOT, however, grant you the right to be heard or heeded. I do find it appalling that you, as a new member, feel it is necessary that we change our ways to suit your needs.
AvJoe wrote:
Instead of calling someone a "liberal" (Which I have been for about 50 years) or some other name I suggest we reframe from name calling and try to honestly and argue facts and honest opinion rather than name calling.
Your suggestion is that we say "Hey, you"? You cannot refrain from name calling. A name is an identification label.
name:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/name1.a : a word or phrase that constitutes the distinctive designation of a person or thing
1.b : a word or symbol used in logic to designate an entity
2 : a descriptive often disparaging epithet <called him names>
3.a : reputation <gave the town a bad name>
3.b : an illustrious record : fame <made a name for himself in golf>
3.c : a person or thing with a reputation
4 : family, clan
5 : appearance as opposed to reality <a friend in name only>
6 : one referred to by a name <praise his holy name>
in the name of
1 : by authority of <open in the name of the law>
2 : for the reason of : using the excuse of <called for reforms in the name of progress>
AvJoe wrote:
This can be a great serious site or a rag paper.
As this is a very subjective point you bring up, there is no need to comment other than to say there is no need to comment.
AvJoe wrote:
I think you know what I advocate. Any position is welcome but misstatements, repeated lies and bigoted, racial or political slurs which please the emotions but are just that, slurs should be called out by members of this group.
I know you think you are appealing to everyone on this forum when you use this statement, but I h**e to tell you that the only responses so far, including mine, have come from conservatives. I know all of the current respondents, and if you notice, not one has been insulting. AuntiE must be having one of her cranky days and does not want to deal with the likes of you. She normally would make fun of your comment, but not be rude until you started it. And, if you pay attention, one of the conservatives called her out for her rudeness. You and your liberal ilk use the word conservative as a dirty word, why should the word liberal not treated in the same manner. It is called "tit for tat", or as CrazyHorse always says, "Quid Pro Quo".
Your admission of being a liberal grants me the right to ask this question: If being a liberal means being welcome to new ideas, open-minded about all people and all topics, accepting of all, why is it that I find, in my experience, most liberals to be h**ers, close-minded on many topics, narrow-minded on others, and less tolerant than I have ever been in my life?
AvJoe wrote:
Of course rebuttals are welcome but again adhering to the rules above.
Here are the rules for this forum:
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-1-1.html#101As the creator of the website makes the rules, again, you can suggest all you want, but this is his/her site and they are the ones that make the rules. You are appealing to the wrong people.
AvJoe wrote:
By the way correcting spelling and English as a primary argument against a position, rather than the substance of what is argued is a cheap shot (seen used many times on these pages) and a poor substitute for fact!
From my experiences, the people needing correction for grammar and spelling are violating the rules you have put forth all the time. Again, while many conservatives on this site do make mistakes, the majority of bad grammar and spelling comes from those proclaiming to be liberal or progressive, with a few of the other -ists thrown in. These are the same people who do drive-by postings. They throw out their opinions or statements without showing any support for their statements, and then when confronted by the bad grammar and/or bad spelling and/or factless statements, they do not debate, they just cower in the corner, bad mouthing the people who call them out with facts destroying their statements. They know they have no supporting evidence, so they retaliate to kindergarten tactics.
In these next few statements, I do not presume to speak for all conservatives, on this site or elsewhere, when I say "We conservatives" or a similar phrase. I just do not want to have to say I do not speak for all each time I use it, so this is blanket coverage.
We conservatives do not refrain from calling an i***t an i***t. That is the Freedom we believe in. The First Amendment allows us to call you out, it does not protect you from being offended, nor does the Declaration of Independence say you have a right to happiness, it says you have a right to pursue happiness.
We conservatives are just as likely to call another conservative out on spelling and grammar and stupidity when we find it, over calling out a liberal, that part is always easy to do. We conservatives live by a higher standard of debate that seems to be missing from your liberal/progressive friends. We are also, in most cases willing to concede that we are incorrect, which is in direct confrontation with the liberal/progressive ideal of never being wrong even when proven wrong.
From my point of view, I have rarely run into a liberal who, when shown the facts, and who cannot find evidence to dispute the contrarian facts nor can find evidence supporting their side, will change their opinion on a topic.
As this was posted last night as 10:30 PM and you have not responded as yet to the previous respondents, I wonder if this was another drive-by?