OPP Newsletter

grazeem Loc: Arizona

Why do we put up with this kind of stuff.

Instead of doing something that is likely to pass, they piss away their time on stuff like this.

Gloris Steimen said that Republicans believe that, "Life begins at conception, and ends at birth." She isn't far off the mark.

What a bunch of boozos!!

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Unless you are female, you have no useful position on this subject.

Not-a-RINO Loc: Michigan

As a guy who is related to many females, I would politely disagree with your assertion. :)

I understand the frustration of the former writer as one would think, "Of all the pressing issues and scandals we have today, why would a major political party waste its time haggling about this?"

As one who never passes a good chance at stirring the pot, I would like to weigh in with these points:

1. I learned from my mother the one thing which separates Americans from other people is how much value we place on life. Over the last many decades, there has been a concerted effort to redefine morality in this country and the a******n debate has certainly been in the center of it.

2. Republicans (many, but not all) advocate personal responsibility. The secret where babies come from has been out for a few years now (a pinch of sarcasm here) so unwanted pregnancies could be avoided easily. No woman has become pregnant from door knobs, toilet seats or some phantom "pregnancy v***s" which means a conscious decision has been made. If not, someone needs to go to prison for a LONG time.

3. Saving the lives of the innocent is worth the effort. On the flip side of the issue, why is it not a waste of time for the Left to promote condom use in the public schools which have shown to not protect the users from the HIV v***s and certain death? Why is not a waste of taxpayer dollars to fund the k*****g of unborn babies? Would decent people find Obama's position of infanticide reprehensible rather than a waste of their waking hours? Why does the Left deceitfully call a******n a "women's health issue"? In extremely rare cases to save the life of the mother, it is true, but some 99.5% are performed soley for convenience.

IMHO, the a******n issue is merely a symptom of a much larger problem. Morality, personal responsibility, proper deportment and chivalry are not being passed down from generation to generation as in the past by parents. People holding godly faith are ridiculed as weird, out-of-touch, mean Bible-thumpers and painted with a very wide brush as all hypocrites. The schools, television and game consoles are now accepted as babysitters. (I am cynical enough to say the tablets young kids have now have an app called "Outside" - an electronic substitute for going outdoors to play with friends, ride bikes, play baseball, etc.)

Yes, the Republican Party needs to stand for accountability from the current regime and prosecute fully those who have violated the public trust, but it can't lose sight of right and wrong. We expect the Left to scoff at what we hold dear. If we ignore the issue, then we are no better than they are.

grazeem Loc: Arizona

A man hating b***h, who would have guessed?

Of course I can have an opinion.

If you would check, most of the "Pro Life" nuts are male.

So I see no reason a "Pro Choice" reasonable person, can't be male, also.

grazeem Loc: Arizona

Not a RINO wrote:

We expect the Left to scoff at what we hold dear.

YOU GOT THAT RIGHT, SCOFF SCOFF!!

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

As to your first descriptive sentence, I checked with a veterinarian this AM with fifteen years experience in the field of veterinary medicine, who should meet all your progressive standards as he is black and gay, who declared I am not a female dog. It was most reassuring for the males of my household, especially my spouse who does not care for the thought of bestiality. My progeny was also reassured as the thought of having to walk me for bathroom trips several times per day was not a welcome idea.

You may have an opinion; however, it is the female who must make the choice. It is the female whose body and mind are most affected by the choice she makes.

I do agree there are many pro life males who show up at events. As with some males, it is supposedly proof their "manhood" to impregnate a female.

See, your last statement is where you loose your personal argument. You used the phrase "reasonable person" which is an oxymoron coming from you.

grazeem Loc: Arizona

Antie wrote:

I do agree there are many pro life males who show up at events. As with some males, it is supposedly proof their "manhood" to impregnate a female.

ARE YOU SAYING THAT ALL THE MEN AT "EVENTS" ARE THE TYPE YOU DISCRIBED?

I WOULD THINK THEY HAVE OTHER REASONS.

IF YOU ARE THIS OUT OF TOUCH, MAYBE YOUR OPINION ISN'T THAT WORTHY. EVEN THOUGH YOU SIT DOWN TO PISS.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Good post. Good read.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Delete the "oxy," and a "reasonable person" could reasonably direct the the remainder at him.

Loki Loc: Georgia

G****r profiling?

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Let us begin with spelling. Anti is actually Aunti.

Perhaps next an etiquette lesson is in order. It is very very very rude to post an entire response in uppercase letters. Is there some need you feel to shout? Perhaps your voice is so small it can only be heard through shouting as your drivel will be overlooked due to your déclassé behavior.

Fact, I did not state "all the men at "events" were of the type I mentioned. It was my suggestion some may be of that attitude. It has been my observation that some tend to bring their many progeny to these events. The question would be is it to show their pro-choice position or their procreation ability or both.

It is of little import to me whether you consider my opinion of any worth or not. The 1st Amendment of the Constitution may have been trampled to perdition since 2008; however, it still exists and is mine to utilize as I see fit.

As a final point, you may p_ _ _ _ (déclassé, but not unexpected from you); however, I urinate.

grazeem Loc: Arizona

I find it interesting that most of the pro choice organizations are run by women,

and most of the pro life organizations are run by men.

Your whole premise is wrong.

You say that men have no business discussing a******n, and yet the drivers of the movement are men.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

I presented no statement concerning who runs pro choice or pro life organizations.

You may discuss a******n until there are ice cubes in hades; however, your opinion has little merit until you are the person to carry and deliver the child and be predominantly responsible for the child until it reaches legal majority. You are aware of the statistics on single mother households, correct?

You seem unable, as teachers say, "to stay on topic".

Not-a-RINO Loc: Michigan

Have you learned the last bastion of the liberal argument is to call names when facts are scant? Just by your first line alone you have surrendered any credibility and have the adults on this forum wondering if it is possible for you to form a cogent thought.

I can tell you the women I have met in my life have nearly all been "pro-life". In fact, one is the regional director of the county's Right to Life office.

I firmly believe in women's rights - a woman has the right to become pregnant with whomever and whenever she wants. It is a conscious decision she made. She also has the right to abstain from promiscuous sex and/or obtain the means to not become pregnant. If those choices are infringed upon by violence, then the perpetrator belongs in prison for a very long time. Beyond her choice, the rest is in God's hands.

Have you ever wondered why it is perfectly legal for a woman to k**l her unborn baby, yet the same woman can go to jail for smashing an osprey's egg?

Do you know who was against legalizing RU486, the so-called "Morning After Pill", in the USA? Planned Parenthood. Why? It's because the a******n mills are big money makers.

Margaret Sanger referred to b****s as "human weeds" and should be eliminated. To no surprise, there is a Planned Parenthood office in every urban area. According to blackgenocide.com, three of every five black pregnancies ends in a******n. (WARNING: Do NOT visit the website as the graphics are extremely gruesome.) Choice? It appears many black women are choosing to make Sanger's legacy complete as the black community is actually LOSING population.

To assume nearly all men are pro-life is to ignore many of our g****r who have the moral conviction of a common cur. For them, a******n is a means of covering their tracks and avoiding responsibility.

I would think if all paternity laws were overturned, illegitimacy rates would drop like a boulder off a steep cliff. Currently, state laws say a woman can abort her unborn baby at any time without the consent of the father, yet if she decides to keep it full term, the father has the right to support it for the next 18 years. If it wasn't for the kickbacks from the federal government states receive from collecting child support, paternity would be a thing of the past.

An illegitimate child should not be the means to access a lifetime of welfare benefits as well. The welfare trap puts young mothers on the Democrat plantation where they have little or no incentive to ever get off the public teat. This crowd v**es well over 90% Democrat as the promises of more welfare come in every e******n cycle. By making welfare too easy, the government is tacitly encouraging irresponsible behavior.

Sir, you own Aunti an apology for your derogatory name-calling. Keep in mind the forum is to converse, not come off as an uncouth, knuckle-d**gging i***t who has to resort to sounding like a victim of Tourette's. You are better than that, right?