The Latest Juducial Outrage
May 24, 2023 06:33:18 #
Maricopa County, Arizona, Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson on Monday ruled against Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake in her e******n challenge of Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs’ victory in November’s e******n.
“The Court finds that looking at signatures that, by and large, have consistent characteristics will require only a cursory examination and thus take very little time,” Thompson continued.
He determined that under Arizona law, the issue was not whether Lake or even the court found the signature review process adequate, but whether Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and his designees did.
“It would be a violation of the constitutional separation of powers … for this Court, after the recorder has made a comparison to insert itself into the process and reweigh whether a signature is consistent or inconsistent,” Thompson wrote.
The judge concluded that Lake did not provide sufficient evidence to conclude Arizona law was not followed.
MY COMMENT: So, in other words, visual proof that b****t signatures do not match was not "sufficient evidence" to conclude Arizona law was not followed. Apparently, you don't need to actually "compare" signatures, you just need to make the effort to PRETEND to check signatures. That is the most "ridiculous" legal decision I have ever heard. Just for yourself if these are valid signatures!
“The Court finds that looking at signatures that, by and large, have consistent characteristics will require only a cursory examination and thus take very little time,” Thompson continued.
He determined that under Arizona law, the issue was not whether Lake or even the court found the signature review process adequate, but whether Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and his designees did.
“It would be a violation of the constitutional separation of powers … for this Court, after the recorder has made a comparison to insert itself into the process and reweigh whether a signature is consistent or inconsistent,” Thompson wrote.
The judge concluded that Lake did not provide sufficient evidence to conclude Arizona law was not followed.
MY COMMENT: So, in other words, visual proof that b****t signatures do not match was not "sufficient evidence" to conclude Arizona law was not followed. Apparently, you don't need to actually "compare" signatures, you just need to make the effort to PRETEND to check signatures. That is the most "ridiculous" legal decision I have ever heard. Just for yourself if these are valid signatures!
May 24, 2023 06:57:46 #
ACP45 wrote:
Maricopa County, Arizona, Superior Court Judge Pet... (show quote)
i have posted many times that no matter the evidence judges are not going to overturn e******ns like this and set a precedent.
May 24, 2023 07:03:27 #
Forkbassman
Loc: Missouri
Liberty Tree wrote:
i have posted many times that no matter the evidence judges are not going to overturn e******ns like this and set a precedent.
Very, very sad but progressives DO NOT CARE about evidence or the law; I hope I am wrong, but it will continue in next year’s POTUS e******n
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.