What if the Nashville shooter was a... ...church going heterosexual? Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity? And to quote another...

American Scene

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?
Wouldn't have to.
It would be 24/7 on CNN/MSM

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Rinaldi wrote:

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

It wasn't right wing media who reported her identity, but police during press conference..🙄

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

Rinaldi wrote:

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

Then they wouldn't be weird f*ggots..... a shame you actually have to ask that stupid question.

Not really

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

Rinaldi wrote:

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

A fat loser of a political figure..... full bore lesbian Hillary the harpy

son of witless

Rinaldi wrote:

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

To answer your question, what if the Nashville shooter was a " church going heterosexual? "

Then you would have posted weeks worth of church bashing topics. You have one thing in your favor. She was a " white " t*********r. So now you can ramp up the usual Left Wing R****T rhetoric.

In the meantime, things being what they are in the modern woke world, I think it is great that we know this woke little cretin's sexual identity. She is a child k**ler. That is as low a human as you can go. That she is a t*****e is icing on the cake.

The only thing that pisses me off is why they have not released the documents left behind by the t***s shooter. There is no reason to hold them back now. If the shooter was a " church going heterosexual " and had left a manifesto authorities would have fallen all over themselves to release it to the anti " church going heterosexual " media to use to bash Christians.

American Scene

liberalh****r wrote:

Then they wouldn't be weird f*ggots..... a shame you actually have to ask that stupid question.

Not really

Seems your preoccupation with 'f*ggotry' is exposing you for what your are.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Rinaldi wrote:

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

Your idiocy and moronicity know no bounds.

Smedley_buzkill

Rinaldi wrote:

Seems your preoccupation with 'f*ggotry' is exposing you for what your are.

While yours is self-explanatory.

American Scene

Parky60 wrote:

Your idiocy and moronicity know no bounds.

Your whining, crying, sniveling, idiocy and moronicity are always displayed with each and every stupid post you

make.

Smedley_buzkill

Parky60 wrote:

Your idiocy and moronicity know no bounds.

Don't say that.... He will think it's a double dog dare.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Rinaldi wrote:

Your whining, crying, sniveling, idiocy and moronicity are always displayed with each and every stupid post you

make.

They say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

American Scene

Parky60 wrote:

They say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Not in your case. It is ridicule of the absurd.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Rinaldi wrote:

Not in your case. It is ridicule of the absurd.

Let's see, you're copying me to ridicule me. As usual, you're irrational.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Rinaldi wrote:

...church going heterosexual?

Would the rightwing media and pundits be so concerned about reporting her sexual identity?

And to quote another former political figure, "What difference does it make"?

Sexual identity, or G****R identity?
I mean, it's like when you identify as a Billy goat when you're servicing a nanny goat.

G****r identity involves male, and female.
Did you ever notice how g****r reassignment surgeries only assign g****r to only two? Male, and female.