Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
https://republicbrief.com/h****r-biden-probe-revs-up-with-final-notice/
Other than lying on a gun permit and possible tax problems, do you know if there are any laws that H****r or the Biden family have actually committed. I suspect legally there are not. Ethically, morally and politically are a different question. The game and laws are r****d to benefit the powerful and exempt them from consequences.
Strycker wrote:
Other than lying on a gun permit and possible tax problems, do you know if there are any laws that H****r or the Biden family have actually committed. I suspect legally there are not. Ethically, morally and politically are a different question. The game and laws are r****d to benefit the powerful and exempt them from consequences.
How about taking showers with your daughter?
How about having Top Secret Doc at home in your garage next to your corvette?
How about smoking crack?
How about not paying federal taxes?
Does any of this apply? Can we add the monies received from Russia, Ukraine and China?
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
How about taking showers with your daughter?
How about having Top Secret Doc at home in your garage next to your corvette?
How about smoking crack?
How about not paying federal taxes?
Does any of this apply? Can we add the monies received from Russia, Ukraine and China?
Taking showers with daughter not illegal.
Secret Docs still under investigation but likely will not be prosecuted.
Smoking crack. H****r not caught at the time. Not chargeable.
Soliciting a prostitute. Not caught at the time. Not chargeable.
Taxes fraud likely but will probably result in a fine at best.
Even if H****r were charged as a foreign agent violating FARA it would likely result in a fine only.
Biden family selling influence is not illegal. Unethical, hell yes. Illegal, probably not. That's what every lobbyist does. What every campaign fund raiser does.
Strycker wrote:
Taking showers with daughter not illegal.
Secret Docs still under investigation but likely will not be prosecuted.
Smoking crack. H****r not caught at the time. Not chargeable.
Soliciting a prostitute. Not caught at the time. Not chargeable.
Taxes fraud likely but will probably result in a fine at best.
Even if H****r were charged as a foreign agent violating FARA it would likely result in a fine only.
Biden family selling influence is not illegal. Unethical, hell yes. Illegal, probably not. That's what every lobbyist does. What every campaign fund raiser does.
Taking showers with daughter not illegal. br Secr... (
show quote)
Since all of the above OK, how about Joe Biden said his team has created "the most extensive and inclusive v***r f***d organization in the history of American politics. Is that all good as well because they all do it?
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
Since all of the above OK, how about Joe Biden said his team has created "the most extensive and inclusive v***r f***d organization in the history of American politics. Is that all good as well because they all do it?
I didn't say any of the above is okay. Just not meaningfully illegal. No biden will do jail time. They may pay some fines out of their pocket change.
The Biden quote is a matter of interpretation of his words. Much like much of the left's distortions of Trumps words.
Strycker wrote:
I didn't say any of the above is okay. Just not meaningfully illegal. No biden will do jail time. They may pay some fines out of their pocket change.
The Biden quote is a matter of interpretation of his words. Much like much of the left's distortions of Trumps words.
How do you interpret those simple English words uttered by Biden about the e******n process?
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
How do you interpret those simple English words uttered by Biden about the e******n process?
"the most extensive and inclusive v***r f***d organization in the history of American politics."
It's not clear if the "v***r f***d organization" is designed to support or combat v***r f***d. Could be interpreted either way.
Strycker wrote:
"the most extensive and inclusive v***r f***d organization in the history of American politics."
It's not clear if the "v***r f***d organization" is designed to support or combat v***r f***d. Could be interpreted either way.
Too hard to understand "inclusive V***R F***D organization in the history of American politics."
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
Too hard to understand "inclusive V***R F***D organization in the history of American politics."
There is no doubt in my mind what your interpretation is. I just choose to not assign meaning to a phrase where that meaning does not clearly exist. I see it much like the false interpretation the left assigned to the phrase, "good people on both sides". Misrepresentation of unclear t***hs is widely used by political ideologs.
Strycker wrote:
There is no doubt in my mind what your interpretation is. I just choose to not assign meaning to a phrase where that meaning does not clearly exist. I see it much like the false interpretation the left assigned to the phrase, "good people on both sides". Misrepresentation of unclear t***hs is widely used by political ideologs.
That's the none answer to the question as expected. Thank for the verification of you - weasel.
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
That's the none answer to the question as expected. Thank for the verification of you - weasel.
I believe I answered you question several posts back. There is no correct interpretation. Only assumptions based on ideological preferences.
Now if you were to ask me for my opinion that might be a different answer. Though opinions are purely speculation and extrapolation and are rarely representative of actual known t***h.
Your welcome for wh**ever verification you feel like you wanted to receive.
Strycker wrote:
I believe I answered you question several posts back. There is no correct interpretation. Only assumptions based on ideological preferences.
Now if you were to ask me for my opinion that might be a different answer. Though opinions are purely speculation and extrapolation and are rarely representative of actual known t***h.
Your welcome for wh**ever verification you feel like you wanted to receive.
So, you don't know the meaning of the simple English words he spoke. Where did you go to school? Weasel High
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
Ri-chard wrote:
So, you don't know the meaning of the simple English words he spoke. Where did you go to school? Weasel High
You assume intent where none was actually stated.
Apparently "Weasel High" was a very good school since I can decern the difference between "simple English words" compared to the speculation of the speakers intentions.
Strycker wrote:
You assume intent where none was actually stated.
Apparently "Weasel High" was a very good school since I can decern the difference between "simple English words" compared to the speculation of the speakers intentions.
You just proved my point about you and Weasel High you are their product.
The speakers' words were about what had been done - no intentions.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.