One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
I double dog dare you to answer this question. You cannot!
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jun 5, 2013 17:02:35   #
TheCracker
 
At least not honestly:



Reply
Jun 5, 2013 17:29:08   #
imbobbyc Loc: Montana
 
Because they can and they do not I say do not want any competition

Reply
Jun 5, 2013 18:46:47   #
usmc4
 
TheC*****r wrote:
At least not honestly:




I would say, because they don't know how fortunate they were to be born alive and loved and never experienced the pain of being torn piece by piece from their mothers womb. I've always wondered, how many of these precious children would have grown to be doctors or scientists. How many would have found the cure for the many diseases that have plagued mankind. It's something to definitely contemplate. I'm thankful to be one of the fortunate. I definitely tried to be honest.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2013 19:32:10   #
willy7
 
TheC*****r wrote:
At least not honestly:


Another thought-provoker from the c*****r. Again, you're trying logic with evil people who 'are like brute beasts, being without natural affection'.

Reply
Jun 5, 2013 19:33:36   #
ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio
 
They LOVE EVIL more than good!

Reply
Jun 5, 2013 22:13:20   #
TheCracker
 
Making another point if I may.

When you consider the vast majority of a******ns are given to black women, then it would appear the liberals are promoting genocide of the black race.

Consider the following:

In America today, almost as many African-American children are aborted as are born.

A black baby is three times more likely to be murdered in the womb than a white baby.

Since 1973, a******n has reduced the black population by over 25 percent.

Twice as many African-Americans have died from a******n than have died from AIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined.

Every three days, more African-Americans are k**led by a******n than have been k**led by the Ku Klux Klan in its entire history.

Planned Parenthood operates the nation's largest chain of a******n clinics and almost 80 percent of its facilities are located in minority neighborhoods.

About 13 percent of American women are black, but they submit to over 35 percent of the a******ns.

What the Ku Klux Klan Could Only Dream About; The A******n Industry is Accomplishing

That is r****t if ever there was and liberals who support it should hang their heads in shame!

Think they will?

Reply
Jun 5, 2013 23:24:16   #
The Dutchman
 
TheC*****r wrote:
At least not honestly:


Great hearing out of you, keep up the good work!

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2013 07:40:45   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Because they are jealous of all other living beings and in their minds(?), the more who are aborted, the less competition the living have.

The people who really root for a******ns are the political left, and these are the people who have no principles, no internal guiding light, no moral foundations. They are missing the part of the brain that understands tenderness, caring, empathy, love.

Reply
Jun 6, 2013 07:53:22   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
TheC*****r wrote:
Making another point if I may.

When you consider the vast majority of a******ns are given to black women, then it would appear the liberals are promoting genocide of the black race.

Consider the following:

In America today, almost as many African-American children are aborted as are born.

A black baby is three times more likely to be murdered in the womb than a white baby.

Since 1973, a******n has reduced the black population by over 25 percent.

Twice as many African-Americans have died from a******n than have died from AIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined.

Every three days, more African-Americans are k**led by a******n than have been k**led by the Ku Klux Klan in its entire history.

Planned Parenthood operates the nation's largest chain of a******n clinics and almost 80 percent of its facilities are located in minority neighborhoods.

About 13 percent of American women are black, but they submit to over 35 percent of the a******ns.

What the Ku Klux Klan Could Only Dream About; The A******n Industry is Accomplishing

That is r****t if ever there was and liberals who support it should hang their heads in shame!

Think they will?
Making another point if I may. br br When you con... (show quote)

You are so very correct! I have copied a couple of excerpts from: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/05/229/

"The senators who originally designed our family planning policies believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people. This article is the second installment in a three-part series.

The stimulus package of 2009 originally included millions of dollars for family planning services each year. Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended this extra funding as a means of saving money, noting that by reducing births to the poor, the government could lower its welfare costs. In the first article in this series, I showed that this idea was already central to U.S. family planning policy as far back as the Nixon administration. In fact, family planning is currently the most favored service of Medicaid, and the federal government spends over $1 billion annually in order to suppress the birth rate of the poor. By law it must encourage poor girls who have reached puberty to begin using contraception. These policies have been in place since 1972, when the welfare laws were changed to impose a national family planning policy on all the states at once, overriding the local laws that generally encouraged parental consent. These provisions were written by the Senate Finance Committee during the first major overhaul of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society welfare laws.

This article appeals to transcripts from the committee hearings to argue that the committee enacted these policies out of r****t, eugenicist motives. While the motives behind the American welfare system were originally idealistic—providing temporary assistance to needy families while they climbed out of poverty—the committee hearings show that the senators believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people."

Reply
Jun 6, 2013 13:20:05   #
willy7
 
TheC*****r wrote:
Making another point if I may.

When you consider the vast majority of a******ns are given to black women, then it would appear the liberals are promoting genocide of the black race.

Consider the following:

In America today, almost as many African-American children are aborted as are born.

A black baby is three times more likely to be murdered in the womb than a white baby.

Since 1973, a******n has reduced the black population by over 25 percent.

Twice as many African-Americans have died from a******n than have died from AIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined.

Every three days, more African-Americans are k**led by a******n than have been k**led by the Ku Klux Klan in its entire history.

Planned Parenthood operates the nation's largest chain of a******n clinics and almost 80 percent of its facilities are located in minority neighborhoods.

About 13 percent of American women are black, but they submit to over 35 percent of the a******ns.

What the Ku Klux Klan Could Only Dream About; The A******n Industry is Accomplishing

That is r****t if ever there was and liberals who support it should hang their heads in shame!

Think they will?
Making another point if I may. br br When you con... (show quote)

Only at gun point, and maybe even then they won't be able to confess their terrible baby-k*****g guilt.

Reply
Jun 6, 2013 16:10:42   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Tasine wrote:
You are so very correct! I have copied a couple of excerpts from: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/05/229/

"The senators who originally designed our family planning policies believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people. This article is the second installment in a three-part series.

The stimulus package of 2009 originally included millions of dollars for family planning services each year. Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended this extra funding as a means of saving money, noting that by reducing births to the poor, the government could lower its welfare costs. In the first article in this series, I showed that this idea was already central to U.S. family planning policy as far back as the Nixon administration. In fact, family planning is currently the most favored service of Medicaid, and the federal government spends over $1 billion annually in order to suppress the birth rate of the poor. By law it must encourage poor girls who have reached puberty to begin using contraception. These policies have been in place since 1972, when the welfare laws were changed to impose a national family planning policy on all the states at once, overriding the local laws that generally encouraged parental consent. These provisions were written by the Senate Finance Committee during the first major overhaul of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society welfare laws.

This article appeals to transcripts from the committee hearings to argue that the committee enacted these policies out of r****t, eugenicist motives. While the motives behind the American welfare system were originally idealistic—providing temporary assistance to needy families while they climbed out of poverty—the committee hearings show that the senators believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people."
You are so very correct! I have copied a couple o... (show quote)


Why have there been so many replies in this thread, up to now, and the first mention of eugenics I have seen came in the quoted part of your reply? It is purely part of the eugenics program that they suggested so many years ago.

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2013 16:41:15   #
TheCracker
 
oldroy wrote:
Why have there been so many replies in this thread, up to now, and the first mention of eugenics I have seen came in the quoted part of your reply? It is purely part of the eugenics program that they suggested so many years ago.


I don't know Roy. What do you think?

Reply
Jun 6, 2013 18:03:22   #
Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC
 
This is typically a progressive methodical way of taking care of the "Poor and Downtrodden" under the guise and ruse of a Woman's right. I won't even start on the "Animal" "Kermit Gozzenell" in Philly and Delaware. It sickens me to think of the Thousands of little lives" that have been destroyed. The only thing their tiny hearts where guilty of was being conceived.

Reply
Jun 6, 2013 18:14:01   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
TheC*****r wrote:
I don't know Roy. What do you think?


I think that they are using eugenics just as, what was that woman who first talked about it in the early 20th century, wanted to do to hold b****s back from reproducing in normal numbers.

They put in welfare for them based on the number of children and then provide a******n for those who don't want children.

Reply
Jun 6, 2013 18:36:26   #
Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC
 
Tasine wrote:
You are so very correct! I have copied a couple of excerpts from: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2009/05/229/

"The senators who originally designed our family planning policies believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people. This article is the second installment in a three-part series.

The stimulus package of 2009 originally included millions of dollars for family planning services each year. Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended this extra funding as a means of saving money, noting that by reducing births to the poor, the government could lower its welfare costs. In the first article in this series, I showed that this idea was already central to U.S. family planning policy as far back as the Nixon administration. In fact, family planning is currently the most favored service of Medicaid, and the federal government spends over $1 billion annually in order to suppress the birth rate of the poor. By law it must encourage poor girls who have reached puberty to begin using contraception. These policies have been in place since 1972, when the welfare laws were changed to impose a national family planning policy on all the states at once, overriding the local laws that generally encouraged parental consent. These provisions were written by the Senate Finance Committee during the first major overhaul of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society welfare laws.

This article appeals to transcripts from the committee hearings to argue that the committee enacted these policies out of r****t, eugenicist motives. While the motives behind the American welfare system were originally idealistic—providing temporary assistance to needy families while they climbed out of poverty—the committee hearings show that the senators believed that the mostly black welfare population was incurably lazy, promiscuous, intellectually substandard, and a burden on public schools, and, moreover, that they probably would remain so indefinitely. Birth control, therefore, was in their eyes a way to reduce the number of these undesirable people."
You are so very correct! I have copied a couple o... (show quote)


Tansine-
Excellent post. Thank you.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.