One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Real v*****e news from peer reviewed studies in respected scientific journals.
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 25, 2023 19:54:16   #
Kevyn
 
Two new studies published Wednesday report good news about the updated C****-** v*****e, with one suggesting it is more effective than the previous monovalent v*****e and the other showing that even though it targeted an earlier strain of the SARS-CoV-2 v***s, its protection is holding up against current variants.
The findings suggest the updated v*****e, which targets both the original SARS-2 v***s and the Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5, is performing better than some critics of the decision to update the v*****e concluded, based on studies that only compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies each induced.
The first study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found the updated v*****e was significantly more effective at protecting against severe illness, hospitalization, and death from C***d than the monovalent v*****e that was previously used.
“It’s clear from this study that the bivalent booster, in that short term following administration, provides additional protection above and beyond that of the monovalent,” said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Policy. “I think that’s clear and this should be a reason why we can feel confident that it was the right decision to go with the bivalent v*****e.”

Reply
Jan 25, 2023 20:04:57   #
elledee
 
Get it and get back to us later hopefully much later

Reply
Jan 25, 2023 20:39:29   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
Kevyn wrote:
Two new studies published Wednesday report good news about the updated C****-** v*****e, with one suggesting it is more effective than the previous monovalent v*****e and the other showing that even though it targeted an earlier strain of the SARS-CoV-2 v***s, its protection is holding up against current variants.
The findings suggest the updated v*****e, which targets both the original SARS-2 v***s and the Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5, is performing better than some critics of the decision to update the v*****e concluded, based on studies that only compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies each induced.
The first study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found the updated v*****e was significantly more effective at protecting against severe illness, hospitalization, and death from C***d than the monovalent v*****e that was previously used.
“It’s clear from this study that the bivalent booster, in that short term following administration, provides additional protection above and beyond that of the monovalent,” said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Policy. “I think that’s clear and this should be a reason why we can feel confident that it was the right decision to go with the bivalent v*****e.”
Two new studies published Wednesday report good ne... (show quote)




No thanks...... no needy no stinkin' shot.

Reply
Jan 25, 2023 20:54:22   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
Two new studies published Wednesday report good news about the updated C****-** v*****e, with one suggesting it is more effective than the previous monovalent v*****e and the other showing that even though it targeted an earlier strain of the SARS-CoV-2 v***s, its protection is holding up against current variants.
The findings suggest the updated v*****e, which targets both the original SARS-2 v***s and the Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5, is performing better than some critics of the decision to update the v*****e concluded, based on studies that only compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies each induced.
The first study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found the updated v*****e was significantly more effective at protecting against severe illness, hospitalization, and death from C***d than the monovalent v*****e that was previously used.
“It’s clear from this study that the bivalent booster, in that short term following administration, provides additional protection above and beyond that of the monovalent,” said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Policy. “I think that’s clear and this should be a reason why we can feel confident that it was the right decision to go with the bivalent v*****e.”
Two new studies published Wednesday report good ne... (show quote)


I think it's clear that we should be questioning why young, healthy people are dropping like flies from heart attacks.

Reply
Jan 25, 2023 21:34:57   #
David L Loc: Central Wisconsin
 
elledee wrote:
Get it and get back to us later hopefully much later


Like, in the next life?

Reply
Jan 25, 2023 22:26:07   #
Kevyn
 
archie bunker wrote:
I think it's clear that we should be questioning why young, healthy people are dropping like flies from heart attacks.


I now have six friends and acquaintances who lost their lives to C***d and know no one who has died from the v******tion. What is your experience?

Reply
Jan 26, 2023 02:00:18   #
Jlw Loc: Wisconsin
 
Kevyn wrote:
I now have six friends and acquaintances who lost their lives to C***d and know no one who has died from the v******tion. What is your experience?


I don't believe you have one friend much less six

Reply
Jan 26, 2023 09:12:32   #
Kevyn
 
Jlw wrote:
I don't believe you have one friend much less six


Exactly the response expected, you have no evidence either first hand or from a legitimate peer reviewed study to support your lunatic beliefs, only the garbage that flows into your social media feed because you subscribe to every nut job conspiracy that supports your warped and tiredly wrong view of the world. You and your ilk are sadly victims of your own ignorance and hatred.

Reply
Jan 26, 2023 09:30:29   #
EmilyD
 
Kevyn wrote:
I now have six friends and acquaintances who lost their lives to C***d and know no one who has died from the v******tion. What is your experience?


When they call every death C***d... including car crashes and drug overdoses...you can BET they are calling v*****e deaths C***d, too...they don't want you to know how many are dying from their bioweapon yet...it's too early to start rigging the 2024 e******n...

Just wait....you'll know soon enough what their plan is. They're working out the details in Davos as we speak.

Reply
Jan 26, 2023 10:10:03   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
EmilyD wrote:
When they call every death C***d... including car crashes and drug overdoses...you can BET they are calling v*****e deaths C***d, too...they don't want you to know how many are dying from their bioweapon yet...it's too early to start rigging the 2024 e******n...

Just wait....you'll know soon enough what their plan is. They're working out the details in Davos as we speak.


What an i***tic world you let yourself live in.. why do you h**e the world so much, why do you embrace such ridiculous lies.. why do you repeat the crazy things fed to you????



Reply
Jan 26, 2023 10:16:41   #
EmilyD
 
permafrost wrote:
What an i***tic world you let yourself live in.. why do you h**e the world so much, why do you embrace such ridiculous lies.. why do you repeat the crazy things fed to you????

I***tic
H**e
ridiculous
lies
crazy

Is that all? It's not like you to have only five insults in one sentence.

...







Reply
Jan 26, 2023 10:34:36   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
I now have six friends and acquaintances who lost their lives to C***d and know no one who has died from the v******tion. What is your experience?


I know no one who has died from C***D, and I know a LOT of people who have had C***D. Myself included.
Monday, a friend, and co-worker died suddenly from an as yet, unexplained cause. He woke up feeling weak with chest pain, and died in the ambulance on the way to the hospital.
He was a healthy 47 year old man who was adamant about the v*****e. Plus, there are many, many reports of young, healthy people, many of them athletes dropping dead from heart issues.
I think it should be questioned.

Reply
Jan 26, 2023 10:34:52   #
BIRDMAN
 
permafrost wrote:
What an i***tic world you let yourself live in.. why do you h**e the world so much, why do you embrace such ridiculous lies.. why do you repeat the crazy things fed to you????


Funny you forgot to mention Obama



Reply
Jan 26, 2023 11:09:20   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Birdmam wrote:
Funny you forgot to mention Obama


Bird, You do of course understand that the spending of Obama admin was a/c the worse recession in 70 years and FDR dealt with a thing called WWll, trump?? only thing he dealt with was his low golf score.. and he managed to spend in just 4 years an amount which other wise would only have been done under emergency of the nation.

we got nothing from the trillions trump squandered.. Obama save the nation and led the world in recovery...



Reply
Jan 26, 2023 11:17:07   #
BIRDMAN
 
permafrost wrote:
Bird, You do of course understand that the spending of Obama admin was a/c the worse recession in 70 years and FDR dealt with a thing called WWll, trump?? only thing he dealt with was his low golf score.. and he managed to spend in just 4 years an amount which other wise would only have been done under emergency of the nation.

we got nothing from the trillions trump squandered.. Obama save the nation and led the world in recovery...


Did Obama have The C***d outbreak when he was president

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.