Climate Activists Alarmed That Twitter Under Musk Allows More Dissenting Views on G****l W*****g: The study accused Twitter of boosting the hashtag “#ClimateS**m” to users when...

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

The study accused Twitter of boosting the hashtag “#ClimateS**m” to users when searching the word “climate,” as its top search result. The hashtag has suddenly spiked on Twitter search results since July 2022, with its appearance increasing ever since, according to CAAD.

The report said that “in 2022, denialist content made a stark comeback on Twitter in particular.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/climate-alarmists-panic-that-twitter-under-musk-allows-more-dissenting-views-on-global-warming_5001629.html?utm_source=News&src_src=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2023-01-22-1&src_cmp=breaking-2023-01-22-1&utm_medium=email&est=nYR5VPtfOt9rLNuMh0EWMZJA75xnMqtw7g0c7pzQJDU%2FPT6jELasVxnzlA3wEkVD

Gatsby

Ri-chard wrote:

The study accused Twitter of boosting the hashtag ... (show quote)

Dissenting views have not been admitted since 2014, the IPCC says so. The debate is over, the subject is closed.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Gatsby wrote:

Dissenting views have not been admitted since 2014, the IPCC says so. The debate is over, the subject is closed.

Read them on the government site.

BIRDMAN

Ri-chard wrote:

The study accused Twitter of boosting the hashtag ... (show quote)

Gatsby

Ri-chard wrote:

Read them on the government site.

I well remember the Federal Court cases resulting from "Weather Modification Programs" in 1976.

Groups were seeding storm clouds with silver iodide, causing cloud ceilings to collapse, preventing hail formation.

The program was highly successful, but had objectionable side effects.

steve66613

Gatsby wrote:

I well remember the Federal Court cases resulting from "Weather Modification Programs" in 1976.

Groups were seeding storm clouds with silver iodide, causing cloud ceilings to collapse, preventing hail formation.

The program was highly successful, but had objectionable side effects.

I’d favor a one-time seeding of clouds with the people of that WEF committee!

Gatsby

steve66613 wrote:

I’d favor a one-time seeding of clouds with the people of that WEF committee!

I reckon the EPA would get you, toxic pollution.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Gatsby wrote:

I well remember the Federal Court cases resulting from "Weather Modification Programs" in 1976.

Groups were seeding storm clouds with silver iodide, causing cloud ceilings to collapse, preventing hail formation.

The program was highly successful, but had objectionable side effects.

And many of remember what was done with cloud seeding in Vietnam.

older and wiser

Ri-chard wrote:

The study accused Twitter of boosting the hashtag ... (show quote)

Climate alarmists are Vermen using f**e science to get a free ride on someone else’s dime!

older and wiser

Gatsby wrote:

I well remember the Federal Court cases resulting from "Weather Modification Programs" in 1976.

Groups were seeding storm clouds with silver iodide, causing cloud ceilings to collapse, preventing hail formation.

The program was highly successful, but had objectionable side effects.

So hasn’t every other thing the government has pretended to fix!

older and wiser

Gatsby wrote:

I reckon the EPA would get you, toxic pollution.

It would be worth it!