One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What the FDA & CDC Say, And What They Really Mean!
Jan 22, 2023 06:47:21   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
I've got to hand it to Steve Kirsch. He has a real flare for reading between the lines, and exposing bureaucratic bulls**t. Case in point, his article citing a Reuters news story citing a potential "safety issue" (stroke), with the P****r v*****e.

"Here’s the Reuters article.

Now let’s unpack it. Here are the two key paragraphs:

The FDA and CDC said that other large studies, the CDC's V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System, other countries' databases and P****r-BioNTech's databases had not f**gged this safety issue, adding that it requires more investigation.

"Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal in VSD (V*****e Safety Datalink) represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public," the health authorities said."

HERE IS WHAT WAS SAID

1. There’s a safety signal, but it’s only in one database we monitor (VSD). It’s not in V***S or anything else.

2. Since we are super honest, we’re letting the public know about it

3. There’s nothing to fear. If it were a real signal, it would be in all the databases, so this is just a glitch in the matrix.

4. Go get your booster, just like we tell you in our new Martha Stewart TV commercial.


HERE IS WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE SAID

1. OK, to be perfectly honest, we KNOW that the shot is causing strokes. In fact, there’s a safety signal for stroke in all the databases, but we’re just too darn corrupt to admit that, and the mainstream press is too ignorant to ask us about it. So we lied. And we get away with it. Always.

In fact, we just admitted in a FOIA request that ischemic stroke triggered a safety signal in V***S, but only Kirsch and a few others of his misinformation spreader friends read the FOIA, so NOBODY’s ever going to figure out we are lying. NOBODY. EVER. It’s in front of their faces in full public view, and the press is so controlled by us that they NEVER CALL US ON our lies. Even when people will die. They are loyal to us. You can trust that we’ll get away with this because we’ve been getting away with murder for decades, and nobody is the wiser (except for RFK Jr., Andy Wakefield, and a few others). But we’ve discredited all of them, and then when people see what happens to people who oppose us, they back off. We are so certain we won’t be caught in a lie that here’s the proof we were lying that the signal was ONLY happening in VSD: (see article for chart)

Overall, we admitted that there were 770 safety signals triggered in V***S including things like death, ischemic stroke, cardiac arrest, pulmonary thrombosis, Bell’s palsy, acute left ventricular failure, acute respiratory failure, chronic left ventricular failure, acute myocardial infarction (i.e., heart attack), deep vein thrombosis, etc. but nobody cares about the FOIAs. They only pay attention to what we tell the press. And we’ve kept this hidden from the press because we don’t want people to know we are lying to them. That would upset the whole operation.

2. For the VSD signal, we needed to make it appear that we are honest because some important third party researcher nailed us on this safety signal so we have to give the appearance we are doing the right thing by informing the public and acknowledging the signal, otherwise we might get busted. But we’re lying about that statement as well. If there is a safety signal, we never admit it unless we are FORCED to admit it. We are never going to admit it out of caution. We don’t give a rat’s ass about saving people’s lives. Are you kidding me? For example, did you notice we NEVER admitted any of the safety signals to the public when they triggered in V***S? Not a single one! If we cared about lives, we’d have published all the V***S signals on month 1. It’s only the signals we are FORCED to admit that we admit publicly. Get it?

We never admitted the V***S signals because nobody reads Josh Guetzkow’s substack (especially this article that exposes how corrupt we are https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/cdc-finally-released-its-v***s-safety ) except for Kirsch and his misinformation spreader friends, so nobody’s going to rat on us who has any credibility.

3. It’s a real safety signal of course. These shots are a disaster and nobody in the mainstream medical community has time to check out the data directly. We control the journals and we make sure that nothing gets published that goes against the narrative, so the medical community gets fooled. Those who actually check out the data or talk to large geriatric practices or nursing homes and find out the t***h are too afraid to speak out because they know they will lose their job, their hospital privileges, their NIH funding, and their license to practice medicine. But most never get that far since we train them in medical school that v*****es are always safe and to always trust authority. That’s why most of the physicians think the v*****es are on the level. They do what they are told.

4. Only a fool would get a booster. Paul Offit is no dummy; he’s not getting any more boosters. Neither should you. The data is CRYSTAL CLEAR: the more boosters you get, the more LIKELY you are to get C***D and DIE from C***D. It’s so obvious to anyone who does any amount of checking. Even people now are realizing that it’s their v******ted friends getting C***D and dying from C***D today. Do your own surveys like this one. 99 out of 100 would validate that the more boosters, the worse the medical outcomes. But the press never does the survey because they are too lazy to do so and because the nursing homes know that if they speak out, there will be a heavy price to pay. So the nursing homes won’t even respond to press inquiries. We’re going to keep this going for decades, just like we did with v*****es and autism. They are never going to find out. And if we ever get close to being busted, we just drop the mandates and refuse to talk about it. We just say it’s irrelevant.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/reuters-p****r-jab-linked-to-stroke

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-says-p****rs-bivalent-c***d-shot-may-be-linked-stroke-older-adults-2023-01-13/



Reply
Jan 22, 2023 09:22:14   #
Ricktloml
 
ACP45 wrote:
I've got to hand it to Steve Kirsch. He has a real flare for reading between the lines, and exposing bureaucratic bulls**t. Case in point, his article citing a Reuters news story citing a potential "safety issue" (stroke), with the P****r v*****e.

"Here’s the Reuters article.

Now let’s unpack it. Here are the two key paragraphs:

The FDA and CDC said that other large studies, the CDC's V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System, other countries' databases and P****r-BioNTech's databases had not f**gged this safety issue, adding that it requires more investigation.

"Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal in VSD (V*****e Safety Datalink) represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public," the health authorities said."

HERE IS WHAT WAS SAID

1. There’s a safety signal, but it’s only in one database we monitor (VSD). It’s not in V***S or anything else.

2. Since we are super honest, we’re letting the public know about it

3. There’s nothing to fear. If it were a real signal, it would be in all the databases, so this is just a glitch in the matrix.

4. Go get your booster, just like we tell you in our new Martha Stewart TV commercial.


HERE IS WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE SAID

1. OK, to be perfectly honest, we KNOW that the shot is causing strokes. In fact, there’s a safety signal for stroke in all the databases, but we’re just too darn corrupt to admit that, and the mainstream press is too ignorant to ask us about it. So we lied. And we get away with it. Always.

In fact, we just admitted in a FOIA request that ischemic stroke triggered a safety signal in V***S, but only Kirsch and a few others of his misinformation spreader friends read the FOIA, so NOBODY’s ever going to figure out we are lying. NOBODY. EVER. It’s in front of their faces in full public view, and the press is so controlled by us that they NEVER CALL US ON our lies. Even when people will die. They are loyal to us. You can trust that we’ll get away with this because we’ve been getting away with murder for decades, and nobody is the wiser (except for RFK Jr., Andy Wakefield, and a few others). But we’ve discredited all of them, and then when people see what happens to people who oppose us, they back off. We are so certain we won’t be caught in a lie that here’s the proof we were lying that the signal was ONLY happening in VSD: (see article for chart)

Overall, we admitted that there were 770 safety signals triggered in V***S including things like death, ischemic stroke, cardiac arrest, pulmonary thrombosis, Bell’s palsy, acute left ventricular failure, acute respiratory failure, chronic left ventricular failure, acute myocardial infarction (i.e., heart attack), deep vein thrombosis, etc. but nobody cares about the FOIAs. They only pay attention to what we tell the press. And we’ve kept this hidden from the press because we don’t want people to know we are lying to them. That would upset the whole operation.

2. For the VSD signal, we needed to make it appear that we are honest because some important third party researcher nailed us on this safety signal so we have to give the appearance we are doing the right thing by informing the public and acknowledging the signal, otherwise we might get busted. But we’re lying about that statement as well. If there is a safety signal, we never admit it unless we are FORCED to admit it. We are never going to admit it out of caution. We don’t give a rat’s ass about saving people’s lives. Are you kidding me? For example, did you notice we NEVER admitted any of the safety signals to the public when they triggered in V***S? Not a single one! If we cared about lives, we’d have published all the V***S signals on month 1. It’s only the signals we are FORCED to admit that we admit publicly. Get it?

We never admitted the V***S signals because nobody reads Josh Guetzkow’s substack (especially this article that exposes how corrupt we are https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/cdc-finally-released-its-v***s-safety ) except for Kirsch and his misinformation spreader friends, so nobody’s going to rat on us who has any credibility.

3. It’s a real safety signal of course. These shots are a disaster and nobody in the mainstream medical community has time to check out the data directly. We control the journals and we make sure that nothing gets published that goes against the narrative, so the medical community gets fooled. Those who actually check out the data or talk to large geriatric practices or nursing homes and find out the t***h are too afraid to speak out because they know they will lose their job, their hospital privileges, their NIH funding, and their license to practice medicine. But most never get that far since we train them in medical school that v*****es are always safe and to always trust authority. That’s why most of the physicians think the v*****es are on the level. They do what they are told.

4. Only a fool would get a booster. Paul Offit is no dummy; he’s not getting any more boosters. Neither should you. The data is CRYSTAL CLEAR: the more boosters you get, the more LIKELY you are to get C***D and DIE from C***D. It’s so obvious to anyone who does any amount of checking. Even people now are realizing that it’s their v******ted friends getting C***D and dying from C***D today. Do your own surveys like this one. 99 out of 100 would validate that the more boosters, the worse the medical outcomes. But the press never does the survey because they are too lazy to do so and because the nursing homes know that if they speak out, there will be a heavy price to pay. So the nursing homes won’t even respond to press inquiries. We’re going to keep this going for decades, just like we did with v*****es and autism. They are never going to find out. And if we ever get close to being busted, we just drop the mandates and refuse to talk about it. We just say it’s irrelevant.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/reuters-p****r-jab-linked-to-stroke

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-says-p****rs-bivalent-c***d-shot-may-be-linked-stroke-older-adults-2023-01-13/
I've got to hand it to Steve Kirsch. He has a real... (show quote)




A lot of us realized 2+ years ago that this is a crime against humanity. But the propaganda push/and the real life consequences of coming forward have now brought us to the point where the jabbed are indeed paying the price with their lives...as many brave doctors warned from the beginning

Reply
Jan 22, 2023 09:52:50   #
albertk
 
ACP45 wrote:
I've got to hand it to Steve Kirsch. He has a real flare for reading between the lines, and exposing bureaucratic bulls**t. Case in point, his article citing a Reuters news story citing a potential "safety issue" (stroke), with the P****r v*****e.

"Here’s the Reuters article.

Now let’s unpack it. Here are the two key paragraphs:

The FDA and CDC said that other large studies, the CDC's V*****e A*****e E***t Reporting System, other countries' databases and P****r-BioNTech's databases had not f**gged this safety issue, adding that it requires more investigation.

"Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal in VSD (V*****e Safety Datalink) represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public," the health authorities said."

HERE IS WHAT WAS SAID

1. There’s a safety signal, but it’s only in one database we monitor (VSD). It’s not in V***S or anything else.

2. Since we are super honest, we’re letting the public know about it

3. There’s nothing to fear. If it were a real signal, it would be in all the databases, so this is just a glitch in the matrix.

4. Go get your booster, just like we tell you in our new Martha Stewart TV commercial.


HERE IS WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE SAID

1. OK, to be perfectly honest, we KNOW that the shot is causing strokes. In fact, there’s a safety signal for stroke in all the databases, but we’re just too darn corrupt to admit that, and the mainstream press is too ignorant to ask us about it. So we lied. And we get away with it. Always.

In fact, we just admitted in a FOIA request that ischemic stroke triggered a safety signal in V***S, but only Kirsch and a few others of his misinformation spreader friends read the FOIA, so NOBODY’s ever going to figure out we are lying. NOBODY. EVER. It’s in front of their faces in full public view, and the press is so controlled by us that they NEVER CALL US ON our lies. Even when people will die. They are loyal to us. You can trust that we’ll get away with this because we’ve been getting away with murder for decades, and nobody is the wiser (except for RFK Jr., Andy Wakefield, and a few others). But we’ve discredited all of them, and then when people see what happens to people who oppose us, they back off. We are so certain we won’t be caught in a lie that here’s the proof we were lying that the signal was ONLY happening in VSD: (see article for chart)

Overall, we admitted that there were 770 safety signals triggered in V***S including things like death, ischemic stroke, cardiac arrest, pulmonary thrombosis, Bell’s palsy, acute left ventricular failure, acute respiratory failure, chronic left ventricular failure, acute myocardial infarction (i.e., heart attack), deep vein thrombosis, etc. but nobody cares about the FOIAs. They only pay attention to what we tell the press. And we’ve kept this hidden from the press because we don’t want people to know we are lying to them. That would upset the whole operation.

2. For the VSD signal, we needed to make it appear that we are honest because some important third party researcher nailed us on this safety signal so we have to give the appearance we are doing the right thing by informing the public and acknowledging the signal, otherwise we might get busted. But we’re lying about that statement as well. If there is a safety signal, we never admit it unless we are FORCED to admit it. We are never going to admit it out of caution. We don’t give a rat’s ass about saving people’s lives. Are you kidding me? For example, did you notice we NEVER admitted any of the safety signals to the public when they triggered in V***S? Not a single one! If we cared about lives, we’d have published all the V***S signals on month 1. It’s only the signals we are FORCED to admit that we admit publicly. Get it?

We never admitted the V***S signals because nobody reads Josh Guetzkow’s substack (especially this article that exposes how corrupt we are https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/cdc-finally-released-its-v***s-safety ) except for Kirsch and his misinformation spreader friends, so nobody’s going to rat on us who has any credibility.

3. It’s a real safety signal of course. These shots are a disaster and nobody in the mainstream medical community has time to check out the data directly. We control the journals and we make sure that nothing gets published that goes against the narrative, so the medical community gets fooled. Those who actually check out the data or talk to large geriatric practices or nursing homes and find out the t***h are too afraid to speak out because they know they will lose their job, their hospital privileges, their NIH funding, and their license to practice medicine. But most never get that far since we train them in medical school that v*****es are always safe and to always trust authority. That’s why most of the physicians think the v*****es are on the level. They do what they are told.

4. Only a fool would get a booster. Paul Offit is no dummy; he’s not getting any more boosters. Neither should you. The data is CRYSTAL CLEAR: the more boosters you get, the more LIKELY you are to get C***D and DIE from C***D. It’s so obvious to anyone who does any amount of checking. Even people now are realizing that it’s their v******ted friends getting C***D and dying from C***D today. Do your own surveys like this one. 99 out of 100 would validate that the more boosters, the worse the medical outcomes. But the press never does the survey because they are too lazy to do so and because the nursing homes know that if they speak out, there will be a heavy price to pay. So the nursing homes won’t even respond to press inquiries. We’re going to keep this going for decades, just like we did with v*****es and autism. They are never going to find out. And if we ever get close to being busted, we just drop the mandates and refuse to talk about it. We just say it’s irrelevant.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/reuters-p****r-jab-linked-to-stroke

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-says-p****rs-bivalent-c***d-shot-may-be-linked-stroke-older-adults-2023-01-13/
I've got to hand it to Steve Kirsch. He has a real... (show quote)


https://rumble.com/v2658gm-caught-him-rebel-news-pummels-p****r-ceo-with-questions-at-world-economic-f.html



Reply
Jan 22, 2023 10:20:11   #
BIRDMAN
 
albertk wrote:
https://rumble.com/v2658gm-caught-him-rebel-news-pummels-p****r-ceo-with-questions-at-world-economic-f.html



Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.