Wouldn’t that be judging them by today’s standards?

Were those natives helping the immigrants to break their own local laws? Were those natives stealing resources through taxes unwillingly or deceptively from their countrymen to illegally subsidize the “illegal” immigrants?

Were the natives building walls around their own homes while decrying the morality of walls being used to defend against foreign “illegal“ immigrants?

Or were both immigrants and natives simply living by the standards of their day?

See the difference?

Being complicit in i*****l i*********n today by Americans is nothing less than an act of treason by those who have no loyalty to nor admiration for our constitution and our way of life. They really do not understand that the liberties and responsibilities our constitution enumerate are “beneficial” and highly superior to their socialistic, godless worldview.

That’s why they want to “fundamentally t***sform” our country and they have no qualms or hesitation to scrap the constitution and rewrite a new one (and impose their godless belief in humanism) according to their current l*****t worldview which they have been indoctrinated and propagandized to believe is preferable. (For point of reference, these are the same people who can’t bring themselves to admit the biological fact that male and female are determined by DNA and made obvious by g*****lia, and think it’s a “right” to murder living unborn humans, even after they survive an a******n attempt and are breathing air, and want us to believe they know what’s morally “right”).

When the native Americans realized the immigrants didn’t plan on merely occupying a small portion of land, but came to colonize the land and “fundamentally t***sform” their whole way of life and bring them into submission, were they pleased? No. They began fighting for their lives to keep their liberties and their way of life. But by then it was too late. The tide was too strong. The rest is history.

That’s what this current wave of immigrants are doing, and l*****ts and sell-out politicians are way too eager to let it happen!

They are t*****rs. Just like the natives who worked with the immigrants to help eradicate their own countrymen.

What would this world look like, how far back in history would we have to go, to “restore” every land and people to the original state of who owned what before “illegal” (by today’s standard) conquests took land and cultures from the original inhabitants? Totally infeasible.

Today’s “i*****l i*********n enablers” want to take us back to serfdom.

That’s not progress.

So hold on thar. Are you against book banning ? All book banning or only when the Right does it ? I dare you to answer. Please do not run away. What about when the Left bans books ? Ohhhhh yea they do ! Now unlike you guys I can give precise examples of what I am referring to. Here is what I am speaking about.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/l*****ts-virginia-ban-k**l-mockingbird-huck-finn-ben-shapiro

" It turns out that if Annie had actually been real, it’s more than likely she’d be banning To K**l a Mockingbird and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. According to WAVY in Virginia, a parent complained that both of those books had excessive racial slurs, and that the books should be removed from the library. The parent explained, “I keep hearing, ‘This is a classic. This is a classic.’….I understand that is a literature classic. But at some point, I feel that children will not – or do not – truly get the classic part – the literature part, which I’m not disputing. This is great literature. But there (are so many) racial slurs in there and offensive wording that you can’t get past that.” The parent added that the very use of the words validated them, teaching that they were acceptable.

This is insanity. "

I happened to have read Huckleberry Finn, and it is a great book.