Why is it wrong to teach about s***ery in our schools? It has existed since 1619 in America (proven fact). It wasn't called that back then, but "indentured servitude" was a definite thing in New England until the Civil War. In the South, of course, s***ery was a way of life until the Emancipation Proclamation of Lincoln in 1863. After the "War of Northern Aggression", s***ery existed for another century in an economic sense until the Civil Rights Act of 1964. What's wrong with teaching this to our kids as factual history?

Economic s***ery exists to this day for minorities. Why can't we admit that and teach it to a younger generation?

S******c R****m (commonly called Critical Race Theory or CRT) is a fact of life. It exists, and even the most diehard conservative knows this, even if they won't admit it. I wonder what they will say when admission quotas are lifted at Harvard and other colleges and their student body will become over 50% Asian-American. What will be the story then? Why are there so few minorities on the Boards of Directors of major corporations (this includes women, by the way.)

The basis for all this is, of course, white male evangelical supremacy in all its glory … whether explicit or implied. The country was founded with that concept in mind, and it has perpetuated in various forms to this day. When that supremacy is challenged by the rise of minority rights or populations, it comes to the fore and becomes dogma for all kinds of suppression to those segments of society that oppose it. Witness v****g suppression in Republican-held states and challenges to minority v****g in national e******ns. This is a classic case of s******c r****m, i.e. maintaining that supremacy at all costs. To say that it is to insure the accuracy of the v**e and prevent fraud is an insult to the intelligence of any patriotic American. The e******n of 2020 was one of the fairest and most accurate e******ns in our history with virtually no fraud being detected despite numerous recounts and audits. The gutting of the V****g Rights Act of 1965 by the Supreme Court open the way for this particular try at suppression to happen.

These attempts at supremacy have failed every time they has emerged in this country. They will fail again, only to repeat a few decades from now. This cycle has only been temporarily broken when minorities and women were given the right to v**e, and v**er suppression is the latest attempt to maintain that superiority that is so endemic in our society.

The only way to keep from repeating the mistakes of the past is to learn from history. Sweeping large parts of our history under the rug because the older generation feels uncomfortable for their part in perpetuating those mistakes is not a reason for burdening the next generation with ignorance of them, thus dooming them to repeating those mistakes.

Why is it wrong to teach about s***ery in our schools? It has existed since 1619 in America (proven fact). It wasn't called that back then, but "indentured servitude" was a definite thing in New England until the Civil War. In the South, of course, s***ery was a way of life until the Emancipation Proclamation of Lincoln in 1863. After the "War of Northern Aggression", s***ery existed for another century in an economic sense until the Civil Rights Act of 1964. What's wrong with teaching this to our kids as factual history?

Economic s***ery exists to this day for minorities. Why can't we admit that and teach it to a younger generation?

S******c R****m (commonly called Critical Race Theory or CRT) is a fact of life. It exists, and even the most diehard conservative knows this, even if they won't admit it. I wonder what they will say when admission quotas are lifted at Harvard and other colleges and their student body will become over 50% Asian-American. What will be the story then? Why are there so few minorities on the Boards of Directors of major corporations (this includes women, by the way.)

The basis for all this is, of course, white male evangelical supremacy in all its glory … whether explicit or implied. The country was founded with that concept in mind, and it has perpetuated in various forms to this day. When that supremacy is challenged by the rise of minority rights or populations, it comes to the fore and becomes dogma for all kinds of suppression to those segments of society that oppose it. Witness v****g suppression in Republican-held states and challenges to minority v****g in national e******ns. This is a classic case of s******c r****m, i.e. maintaining that supremacy at all costs. To say that it is to insure the accuracy of the v**e and prevent fraud is an insult to the intelligence of any patriotic American. The e******n of 2020 was one of the fairest and most accurate e******ns in our history with virtually no fraud being detected despite numerous recounts and audits. The gutting of the V****g Rights Act of 1965 by the Supreme Court open the way for this particular try at suppression to happen.

These attempts at supremacy have failed every time they has emerged in this country. They will fail again, only to repeat a few decades from now. This cycle has only been temporarily broken when minorities and women were given the right to v**e, and v**er suppression is the latest attempt to maintain that superiority that is so endemic in our society.

The only way to keep from repeating the mistakes of the past is to learn from history. Sweeping large parts of our history under the rug because the older generation feels uncomfortable for their part in perpetuating those mistakes is not a reason for burdening the next generation with ignorance of them, thus dooming them to repeating those mistakes.

You are neglecting numerous historical facts in your pursuit of "historical fact." The first is that of about 11 million s***es t***sported from Africa to the Americas, only some 600,000 ended up in what became the United States. Gee, I wonder what happened to the other 10.94 million? Does South America and the Caribbean ring a bell?
Secondly s***ery was a fact of life in those days, all over the world. The United States accounted for a very small portion of the s***es in the world. Somewhere around 1%. Almost every s***e t***sported to what became the US was already a s***e, ens***ed by other BLACK AFRICANS. Somehow your precious CRT forgets all about that part. Almost every s***e t***sported to what became the US arrived on a BRITISH s***e ship before we were even a country. The few American s***e ships were, with one exception, owned by Northeastern Industrialists who gave lip service to abolition even as they financed s***e gathering operations. The one exception was a Southern owned ship called the Clotilda, which made ONE run, t***sporting about 200 s***es. This was in 1860, in violation of US law.
The "Emancipation Proclamation" ignored the half million s***es who had the misfortune to live in one of the four s***e states who did not secede. These remained s***es until the ratification of the 13th Amendment more than two years later.
CRT also ignores the fact that Muslim s***ers, many of whom were black, conducted s***e raids on white settlements all over the Mediterranean and Western European coasts. At the time of the Civil War there were an estimated one and a half million w****s in s***ery in Africa and the Middle East.
S***ery has existed since the dawn of recorded history and probably before that. B****s ens***ed each other for a couple of thousand years before the first white man ever set foot in sub-Saharan Africa.
According to MSNBC, in the 1830 census there were 1,276 black s***e owners in the US. About half of them "owned" a couple of family members to protect them. The other half bought and sold other b****s just like their counterparts in Africa.
CRT tries to place the blame for everything on w****s. Black students get preferential treatment and still cannot compete with Asian or White students in many cases. Much of what is wrong with b****s today lies in the fact that some 75% of them are born to single mothers. It is a proven fact that children of any race who live in a single parent home do worse in school and are more prone to delinquency.
Black males age 15-30 are some 4% of the US population and commit more than half the murders and more than 70% of the violent crime. Morever, this percentage is even smaller when you consider that black males of this age group who live in small towns or rural areas are no more likely than anyone else to commit a crime. It is driven almost completely by urban black males between the ages of 15 and 30. Period. I have, at one time or another documented every statement I just made, with official US government statistics and publications. I am tired of doing so when leg humping liberals don't bother to read them.
Much of what is wrong with Black America today is self-inflicted. It will not change until there is an emphasis on discipline and education among younger b****s; until a two parent family replaces a street gang as a family. Much of what you Liberals term "w***e s*******y" or the ever popular raaaaaaciiiiiiiism is eng****red by black behavior, and is a perfectly understandable reaction to such.

You are neglecting numerous historical facts in your pursuit of "historical fact." The first is that of about 11 million s***es t***sported from Africa to the Americas, only some 600,000 ended up in what became the United States. Gee, I wonder what happened to the other 10.94 million? Does South America and the Caribbean ring a bell?
Secondly s***ery was a fact of life in those days, all over the world. The United States accounted for a very small portion of the s***es in the world. Somewhere around 1%. Almost every s***e t***sported to what became the US was already a s***e, ens***ed by other BLACK AFRICANS. Somehow your precious CRT forgets all about that part. Almost every s***e t***sported to what became the US arrived on a BRITISH s***e ship before we were even a country. The few American s***e ships were, with one exception, owned by Northeastern Industrialists who gave lip service to abolition even as they financed s***e gathering operations. The one exception was a Southern owned ship called the Clotilda, which made ONE run, t***sporting about 200 s***es. This was in 1860, in violation of US law.
The "Emancipation Proclamation" ignored the half million s***es who had the misfortune to live in one of the four s***e states who did not secede. These remained s***es until the ratification of the 13th Amendment more than two years later.
CRT also ignores the fact that Muslim s***ers, many of whom were black, conducted s***e raids on white settlements all over the Mediterranean and Western European coasts. At the time of the Civil War there were an estimated one and a half million w****s in s***ery in Africa and the Middle East.
S***ery has existed since the dawn of recorded history and probably before that. B****s ens***ed each other for a couple of thousand years before the first white man ever set foot in sub-Saharan Africa.
According to MSNBC, in the 1830 census there were 1,276 black s***e owners in the US. About half of them "owned" a couple of family members to protect them. The other half bought and sold other b****s just like their counterparts in Africa.
CRT tries to place the blame for everything on w****s. Black students get preferential treatment and still cannot compete with Asian or White students in many cases. Much of what is wrong with b****s today lies in the fact that some 75% of them are born to single mothers. It is a proven fact that children of any race who live in a single parent home do worse in school and are more prone to delinquency.
Black males age 15-30 are some 4% of the US population and commit more than half the murders and more than 70% of the violent crime. Morever, this percentage is even smaller when you consider that black males of this age group who live in small towns or rural areas are no more likely than anyone else to commit a crime. It is driven almost completely by urban black males between the ages of 15 and 30. Period. I have, at one time or another documented every statement I just made, with official US government statistics and publications. I am tired of doing so when leg humping liberals don't bother to read them.
Much of what is wrong with Black America today is self-inflicted. It will not change until there is an emphasis on discipline and education among younger b****s; until a two parent family replaces a street gang as a family. Much of what you Liberals term "w***e s*******y" or the ever popular raaaaaaciiiiiiiism is eng****red by black behavior, and is a perfectly understandable reaction to such.

Why is it wrong to teach about s***ery in our schools? It has existed since 1619 in America (proven fact). It wasn't called that back then, but "indentured servitude" was a definite thing in New England until the Civil War. In the South, of course, s***ery was a way of life until the Emancipation Proclamation of Lincoln in 1863. After the "War of Northern Aggression", s***ery existed for another century in an economic sense until the Civil Rights Act of 1964. What's wrong with teaching this to our kids as factual history?

Economic s***ery exists to this day for minorities. Why can't we admit that and teach it to a younger generation?

S******c R****m (commonly called Critical Race Theory or CRT) is a fact of life. It exists, and even the most diehard conservative knows this, even if they won't admit it. I wonder what they will say when admission quotas are lifted at Harvard and other colleges and their student body will become over 50% Asian-American. What will be the story then? Why are there so few minorities on the Boards of Directors of major corporations (this includes women, by the way.)

The basis for all this is, of course, white male evangelical supremacy in all its glory … whether explicit or implied. The country was founded with that concept in mind, and it has perpetuated in various forms to this day. When that supremacy is challenged by the rise of minority rights or populations, it comes to the fore and becomes dogma for all kinds of suppression to those segments of society that oppose it. Witness v****g suppression in Republican-held states and challenges to minority v****g in national e******ns. This is a classic case of s******c r****m, i.e. maintaining that supremacy at all costs. To say that it is to insure the accuracy of the v**e and prevent fraud is an insult to the intelligence of any patriotic American. The e******n of 2020 was one of the fairest and most accurate e******ns in our history with virtually no fraud being detected despite numerous recounts and audits. The gutting of the V****g Rights Act of 1965 by the Supreme Court open the way for this particular try at suppression to happen.

These attempts at supremacy have failed every time they has emerged in this country. They will fail again, only to repeat a few decades from now. This cycle has only been temporarily broken when minorities and women were given the right to v**e, and v**er suppression is the latest attempt to maintain that superiority that is so endemic in our society.

The only way to keep from repeating the mistakes of the past is to learn from history. Sweeping large parts of our history under the rug because the older generation feels uncomfortable for their part in perpetuating those mistakes is not a reason for burdening the next generation with ignorance of them, thus dooming them to repeating those mistakes.

You are neglecting numerous historical facts in your pursuit of "historical fact." The first is that of about 11 million s***es t***sported from Africa to the Americas, only some 600,000 ended up in what became the United States. Gee, I wonder what happened to the other 10.94 million? Does South America and the Caribbean ring a bell?
Secondly s***ery was a fact of life in those days, all over the world. The United States accounted for a very small portion of the s***es in the world. Somewhere around 1%. Almost every s***e t***sported to what became the US was already a s***e, ens***ed by other BLACK AFRICANS. Somehow your precious CRT forgets all about that part. Almost every s***e t***sported to what became the US arrived on a BRITISH s***e ship before we were even a country. The few American s***e ships were, with one exception, owned by Northeastern Industrialists who gave lip service to abolition even as they financed s***e gathering operations. The one exception was a Southern owned ship called the Clotilda, which made ONE run, t***sporting about 200 s***es. This was in 1860, in violation of US law.
The "Emancipation Proclamation" ignored the half million s***es who had the misfortune to live in one of the four s***e states who did not secede. These remained s***es until the ratification of the 13th Amendment more than two years later.
CRT also ignores the fact that Muslim s***ers, many of whom were black, conducted s***e raids on white settlements all over the Mediterranean and Western European coasts. At the time of the Civil War there were an estimated one and a half million w****s in s***ery in Africa and the Middle East.
S***ery has existed since the dawn of recorded history and probably before that. B****s ens***ed each other for a couple of thousand years before the first white man ever set foot in sub-Saharan Africa.
According to MSNBC, in the 1830 census there were 1,276 black s***e owners in the US. About half of them "owned" a couple of family members to protect them. The other half bought and sold other b****s just like their counterparts in Africa.
CRT tries to place the blame for everything on w****s. Black students get preferential treatment and still cannot compete with Asian or White students in many cases. Much of what is wrong with b****s today lies in the fact that some 75% of them are born to single mothers. It is a proven fact that children of any race who live in a single parent home do worse in school and are more prone to delinquency.
Black males age 15-30 are some 4% of the US population and commit more than half the murders and more than 70% of the violent crime. Morever, this percentage is even smaller when you consider that black males of this age group who live in small towns or rural areas are no more likely than anyone else to commit a crime. It is driven almost completely by urban black males between the ages of 15 and 30. Period. I have, at one time or another documented every statement I just made, with official US government statistics and publications. I am tired of doing so when leg humping liberals don't bother to read them.
Much of what is wrong with Black America today is self-inflicted. It will not change until there is an emphasis on discipline and education among younger b****s; until a two parent family replaces a street gang as a family. Much of what you Liberals term "w***e s*******y" or the ever popular raaaaaaciiiiiiiism is eng****red by black behavior, and is a perfectly understandable reaction to such.