One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Power of Women in Politics is being Tested
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 27, 2022 13:07:43   #
336Robin Loc: North Carolina
 
microphor wrote:
Biden's a liar. A restriction/limit is not a ban but you and the rest of your ilk are too lazy to read the proposed bills yourself, so you let some lying flunky who couldn't pass law school without c***ting tell you what's in it.


A weak misinformed come back if there ever was one.

Bottomline. Magas are religious tyrants that people who think dislike.

Reply
Sep 27, 2022 13:34:54   #
American Vet
 
336Robin wrote:
A weak misinformed come back if there ever was one.

Bottomline. Magas are religious tyrants that people who think dislike.


Sadly for most people oppose a******n "on demand" as birth control.

https://www.lifenews.com/2022/07/06/new-poll-americans-oppose-a******n-on-demand-reject-k*****g-babies-for-any-reason/

https://www.care-net.org/abundant-life-blog/americans-overwhelmingly-oppose-a******n-on-demand

Reply
Sep 28, 2022 08:55:06   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
336Robin wrote:
A weak misinformed come back if there ever was one.

Bottomline. Magas are religious tyrants that people who think dislike.


I gave you my personal perspective already on the first page, but if your looking for what Biden is calling a ban by Republicans to be explained, here is a good example of the limitations "not ban" that Republicans are seeding:

What am I proposing for our country? That at 15 weeks, when the baby can feel pain, you provide anesthesia to save its life. If you operate on it, it should be protected from being dismembered by an a******nist. That puts us in line with France, Germany, Great Britain. Graham's bill includes several exceptions, including for rape, incest and when a woman's life is in danger from a pregnancy. It also explicitly bans the prosecution of women seeking a******ns."

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2022 16:35:03   #
Weswill
 
It is not about a woman's right. The constitution to my knowledge does not have a clause in it giving a woman the right to have an a******n. The right that you do have is to say no to sex or be willing to accept the responsibility of motherhood and fatherhood before having sex. That is where your right is not after the fact when another person is involved in your decision. It then is not just about your right to choose what is best for you but also what is best for your baby. So we are not taking away your rights we are just changing where your rights are at, before you get pregnant not after.

Reply
Sep 28, 2022 17:02:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Weswill wrote:
It is not about a woman's right. The constitution to my knowledge does not have a clause in it giving a woman the right to have an a******n. The right that you do have is to say no to sex or be willing to accept the responsibility of motherhood and fatherhood before having sex. That is where your right is not after the fact when another person is involved in your decision. It then is not just about your right to choose what is best for you but also what is best for your baby. So we are not taking away your rights we are just changing where your rights are at, before you get pregnant not after.
It is not about a woman's right. The constitution ... (show quote)


Well said.

Reply
Sep 28, 2022 19:23:46   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Weswill wrote:
It is not about a woman's right. The constitution to my knowledge does not have a clause in it giving a woman the right to have an a******n. The right that you do have is to say no to sex or be willing to accept the responsibility of motherhood and fatherhood before having sex. That is where your right is not after the fact when another person is involved in your decision. It then is not just about your right to choose what is best for you but also what is best for your baby. So we are not taking away your rights we are just changing where your rights are at, before you get pregnant not after.
It is not about a woman's right. The constitution ... (show quote)


who are you responding to please. If you use the quote reply tab instead of reply tab when responding, it will automatically show who you are responding to.

Reply
Sep 28, 2022 21:13:51   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
336Robin wrote:
A weak misinformed come back if there ever was one.

Bottomline. Magas are religious tyrants that people who think dislike.


You should try reasoning sometime. Sounds like you haven't been able to "think" your way out of your box!

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2022 22:12:27   #
elledee
 
336Robin wrote:
In the video below President Biden talks about the intent of the Maga Republicans
to ban a******n in all 50 states and his promise to veto it.

He says that women v**ers are being tested and I believe that is true.

The men that support the women are also being tested and in less than 50 days we will see
how things turn out.

You should listen to this speech.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/how-nevada-could-doom-democrats-hopes-of-holding-senate-090008397.html


The power of i***ts on politics has been tested....You failed

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.