One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump gave Aid and Comfort to the I**********nists---a violation of the 14th Amendment
Page <prev 2 of 14 next> last>>
Sep 9, 2022 14:35:43   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
keepuphope wrote:
Kamala gave aid and comfort to all the terrorist A****a after the burned down and l**ted Americans businesses. Isn't the white house supposed to be the people's house and our representatives supposed to push the people's agenda who elected them not their own agenda?


A crime committed is subject to the local authorities, not the federal Government, other then specific cases.. and many were arrested and paid the price for violating the law..

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 15:03:42   #
Bevvy
 
336Robin wrote:
It's very likely that Donald Trump will be found guilty of a violation of the 14th Amendment.
It would disqualify him as a candidate for President in 2024.



CBS News
Former Trump White House lawyer thinks Trump violated 14th Amendment
Major Garrett
Fri, September 9, 2022 at 6:00 AM

Ty Cobb, who was a White House lawyer during former President Donald Trump's administration, suspects the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled White House documents — some of them highly classified — is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the J*** 6, 2021, Capitol r**t and efforts to overturn the 2020 e******n.

"It is about the bigger picture, the J*** 6 issues, the f**e e*****rs, the whole s**m with regard to the 'big lie' and the attempts to…cling to the presidency in a desperate fashion," Cobb said on this week's episode of "The Takeout" podcast.


A clue for Cobb, a former federal prosecutor, was the scope of the warrant authorized to search Trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

"The search warrant is unusually large and broad," Cobb told CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett. "It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take."

"For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it," he said. "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb represented the White House during special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into suspected Trump collusion with Russian entities in the runup to the 2016 e******n. That investigation yielded no charges against Trump.

Garrett asked Cobb about his White House experience watching Trump deal with documents – routine or classified.

"The president…was cautioned many times about not tearing up documents," Cobb said. "In my own experience, I have to say, there wasn't really anything quite as consequential as the press reports that I've read. I saw him tear up newspaper articles which sadly, some staffer would have to tape back together at the end of the day. I saw him tear up inconsequential documents, but I never saw him tear up a classified document or something that was important."

As for Trump's legal future, Cobb said he does not believe the documents investigation is the biggest threat.

"I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the J*** 6 proceeding," Cobb said. "I think that and the attempts to interfere in the e******n count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally."

Cobb says he thinks the possibility of an indictment against Trump is "very high."

In response to a question about Trump's attempts to deny the outcome of the 2020 e******n and overturn the results, Cobb, based on his extensive working relationship with Trump, said, "I believe former President Trump to be a deeply wounded narcissist, and he is often incapable of acting other than in his perceived self-interest or for revenge," Cobb said. "I think those are the two compelling instincts that guide his actions."

Cobb also thinks that Trump's actions around the J*** 6 attack on the Capitol could lead him to be barred from running for the presidency again.

"There is a simple way to disqualify President Trump," Cobb said. "He clearly violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution's Article III when he gave aid and comfort and three hours of inaction with regard to what was happening on the grounds of the Capitol. That clearly gave aid and comfort to the i**********nists."
It's very likely that Donald Trump will be found g... (show quote)

We are steadily being invaded from the southern border and have been every day biden has been in the white house
Section 4 of the Constitution
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 15:20:53   #
okie don
 
Bevvy wrote:
We are steadily being invaded from the southern border and have been every day biden has been in the white house
Section 4 of the Constitution
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


Bevvy,
I always thought that the primary job of any government was to protect the citizens from attack and harm.
I can visualize the fellow Americans living on the borders in Texas, New Mexico and Arizona worried about who might break into their homes in the dead of night. How could they sleep peacefully?
I hear most are armed as they check their property not knowing what to expect.
Trump tried to stop this alien invasion so now they are shipping them up north.
Let the Blue States take care of them. The Democratic states as it's what they deserve.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2022 15:33:18   #
Weswill
 
If that is that case then why didn't the officers pull and use their weapons before the crowd broke into the capitol?? I would think that action might have stopped at least some from continuing on. Maybe they didn't really want to stop them.. hmmmm you reccond.

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 15:50:18   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
when an i**********nist determined to murder the VP and speaker of the house is breaking into the capital of our nation they must be shot.. and shoot to k**l is the order of the day on such and attack.. Byrd only error was to stop pulling the trigger..


There you go again.
1. No one has been charged with i**********n. Was Ms. Bobbitt the only one??? How did Byrd know that?
2. You have no idea if her goal was to murder anyone, much less the VP. Neither did Byrd. All supposition.
3. If any other policeman, in any other circumstances, had shot an unarmed person, you would want him charged.
4. His only error was to stop pulling the trigger? Tell me again how the right is supposedly more violent. Or are you just another keyboard warrior?

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 15:54:19   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
A crime committed is subject to the local authorities, not the federal Government, other then specific cases.. and many were arrested and paid the price for violating the law..


Less than 400 were charged. How many of those actually went to trial or were convicted? Just a wild guess, but since almost all of these r**ts occurred in Democrat cities and Democrat states where Democrats approved of the r**ts, and THEY were the 'local authorities', I would be surprised if more that 40 or 50 spent one night behind bars.
Do you have evidence to the contrary?

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 16:12:22   #
American Vet
 
permafrost wrote:
when an i**********nist determined to murder the VP and speaker of the house is breaking into the capital of our nation they must be shot.. and shoot to k**l is the order of the day on such and attack.. Byrd only error was to stop pulling the trigger..


That's right, you violent, blood thirsty ELWNJ - all that junk about a trial, due process, etc. (and you call others "Facist?) - just k**l'em all.

Unless, of course, they are your beloved Seattle/Portland r****rs.

You are a miserable, pathetic POS.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2022 16:16:26   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
336Robin wrote:
It's very likely that Donald Trump will be found guilty of a violation of the 14th Amendment.
It would disqualify him as a candidate for President in 2024.



CBS News
Former Trump White House lawyer thinks Trump violated 14th Amendment
Major Garrett
Fri, September 9, 2022 at 6:00 AM

Ty Cobb, who was a White House lawyer during former President Donald Trump's administration, suspects the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled White House documents — some of them highly classified — is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the J*** 6, 2021, Capitol r**t and efforts to overturn the 2020 e******n.

"It is about the bigger picture, the J*** 6 issues, the f**e e*****rs, the whole s**m with regard to the 'big lie' and the attempts to…cling to the presidency in a desperate fashion," Cobb said on this week's episode of "The Takeout" podcast.


A clue for Cobb, a former federal prosecutor, was the scope of the warrant authorized to search Trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

"The search warrant is unusually large and broad," Cobb told CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett. "It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take."

"For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it," he said. "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb represented the White House during special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into suspected Trump collusion with Russian entities in the runup to the 2016 e******n. That investigation yielded no charges against Trump.

Garrett asked Cobb about his White House experience watching Trump deal with documents – routine or classified.

"The president…was cautioned many times about not tearing up documents," Cobb said. "In my own experience, I have to say, there wasn't really anything quite as consequential as the press reports that I've read. I saw him tear up newspaper articles which sadly, some staffer would have to tape back together at the end of the day. I saw him tear up inconsequential documents, but I never saw him tear up a classified document or something that was important."

As for Trump's legal future, Cobb said he does not believe the documents investigation is the biggest threat.

"I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the J*** 6 proceeding," Cobb said. "I think that and the attempts to interfere in the e******n count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally."

Cobb says he thinks the possibility of an indictment against Trump is "very high."

In response to a question about Trump's attempts to deny the outcome of the 2020 e******n and overturn the results, Cobb, based on his extensive working relationship with Trump, said, "I believe former President Trump to be a deeply wounded narcissist, and he is often incapable of acting other than in his perceived self-interest or for revenge," Cobb said. "I think those are the two compelling instincts that guide his actions."

Cobb also thinks that Trump's actions around the J*** 6 attack on the Capitol could lead him to be barred from running for the presidency again.

"There is a simple way to disqualify President Trump," Cobb said. "He clearly violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution's Article III when he gave aid and comfort and three hours of inaction with regard to what was happening on the grounds of the Capitol. That clearly gave aid and comfort to the i**********nists."
It's very likely that Donald Trump will be found g... (show quote)

Swing and a miss! Try again.

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 17:01:10   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
permafrost wrote:
when an i**********nist determined to murder the VP and speaker of the house is breaking into the capital of our nation they must be shot.. and shoot to k**l is the order of the day on such and attack.. Byrd only error was to stop pulling the trigger..


Hear hear! I second that opinion.

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 17:03:37   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
These are patriots


Nope.
Stop fooling yourselves.
If you don’t believe it.

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 17:16:42   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
soontobeindicted mattoid wrote:
Hear hear! I second that opinion.


And the bid is up to TWO self-righteous leftwingers who advocate for police to shoot unarmed protesters/r****rs!
I guess it is a good thing when the left decides to label them as i**********nists. Accusations are enough. Graham, Paul, Cruz, DeSantis, they are all now open targets per Perm and Mattoid.

Anyone out there want to make it THREE American 'patriots' ?

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2022 17:22:57   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
RandyBrian wrote:
And the bid is up to TWO self-righteous leftwingers who advocate for police to shoot unarmed protesters/r****rs!
I guess it is a good thing when the left decides to label them as i**********nists. Accusations are enough. Graham, Paul, Cruz, DeSantis, they are all now open targets per Perm and Mattoid.

Anyone out there want to make it THREE American 'patriots' ?


Randy, you're so wound up you're starting to squeak.

Did you go to the i**********n?

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 17:24:42   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
336Robin wrote:
It's very likely that Donald Trump will be found guilty of a violation of the 14th Amendment.
It would disqualify him as a candidate for President in 2024.



CBS News
Former Trump White House lawyer thinks Trump violated 14th Amendment
Major Garrett
Fri, September 9, 2022 at 6:00 AM

Ty Cobb, who was a White House lawyer during former President Donald Trump's administration, suspects the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled White House documents — some of them highly classified — is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the J*** 6, 2021, Capitol r**t and efforts to overturn the 2020 e******n.

"It is about the bigger picture, the J*** 6 issues, the f**e e*****rs, the whole s**m with regard to the 'big lie' and the attempts to…cling to the presidency in a desperate fashion," Cobb said on this week's episode of "The Takeout" podcast.


A clue for Cobb, a former federal prosecutor, was the scope of the warrant authorized to search Trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

"The search warrant is unusually large and broad," Cobb told CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett. "It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take."

"For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it," he said. "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb represented the White House during special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into suspected Trump collusion with Russian entities in the runup to the 2016 e******n. That investigation yielded no charges against Trump.

Garrett asked Cobb about his White House experience watching Trump deal with documents – routine or classified.

"The president…was cautioned many times about not tearing up documents," Cobb said. "In my own experience, I have to say, there wasn't really anything quite as consequential as the press reports that I've read. I saw him tear up newspaper articles which sadly, some staffer would have to tape back together at the end of the day. I saw him tear up inconsequential documents, but I never saw him tear up a classified document or something that was important."

As for Trump's legal future, Cobb said he does not believe the documents investigation is the biggest threat.

"I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the J*** 6 proceeding," Cobb said. "I think that and the attempts to interfere in the e******n count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally."

Cobb says he thinks the possibility of an indictment against Trump is "very high."

In response to a question about Trump's attempts to deny the outcome of the 2020 e******n and overturn the results, Cobb, based on his extensive working relationship with Trump, said, "I believe former President Trump to be a deeply wounded narcissist, and he is often incapable of acting other than in his perceived self-interest or for revenge," Cobb said. "I think those are the two compelling instincts that guide his actions."

Cobb also thinks that Trump's actions around the J*** 6 attack on the Capitol could lead him to be barred from running for the presidency again.

"There is a simple way to disqualify President Trump," Cobb said. "He clearly violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution's Article III when he gave aid and comfort and three hours of inaction with regard to what was happening on the grounds of the Capitol. That clearly gave aid and comfort to the i**********nists."
It's very likely that Donald Trump will be found g... (show quote)



Save the monkeys.... "monkey rape matters"

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 17:33:25   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
RandyBrian wrote:
Less than 400 were charged. How many of those actually went to trial or were convicted? Just a wild guess, but since almost all of these r**ts occurred in Democrat cities and Democrat states where Democrats approved of the r**ts, and THEY were the 'local authorities', I would be surprised if more that 40 or 50 spent one night behind bars.
Do you have evidence to the contrary?


While you are not correct, it is a shame the truck driver who tried to drive his 16 wheeler through the crowd on the bridge did have charges dismissed.. such a shame..

As for who was charged for what.. you should look at the whole picture rather then just the part you like..

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/01/07/figures-show-stark-difference-between-arrests-at-dc-black-l***s-m****r-protest-and-arrests-at-capitol-hill/?sh=17551f575706

Figures Show Stark Difference Between Arrests At D.C. Black L***s M****r Protest And Arrests At Capitol Hill

KEY FACTS
Just 52 people were arrested in Washington D.C. Wednesday after Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and interrupted Congress certifying President-elect Joe Biden’s win.

As officials investigate further, the number is paltry when compared to the arrests made in D.C. during protests for racial justice last summer after G****e F***d was k**led in police custody, with hundreds of people being arrested for unrest-related offenses over the course of a few days.

Between May 30 and June 2 2020, the height of the racial justice protests, 427 "unrest-related" arrests were made in D.C., including 24 juveniles, the police department says.

Between May 30 and June 2 2020, the height of the racial justice protests, 427 "unrest-related" arrests were made in D.C., including 24 juveniles, the police department says.

On June 1 alone, more than five times the number of people were arrested than on the day the Capitol was stormed, with 289 people booked.

The day before also saw a high number of arrests — 90 — nearly double the number seen on Wednesday.

Reply
Sep 9, 2022 17:36:34   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
American Vet wrote:
That's right, you violent, blood thirsty ELWNJ - all that junk about a trial, due process, etc. (and you call others "Facist?) - just k**l'em all.

Unless, of course, they are your beloved Seattle/Portland r****rs.

You are a miserable, pathetic POS.






Gee, did they have r**ts in Seattle Portland over a murder in Minneapolis.. wow that is great... were you there or did you stay in your safe room?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.