Geo

Republicans Running on Cutting Social Security and Medicarehttps://democrats.org › news › republicans-running-on-...
Jul 12, 2022 — Senator Rick Scott, in charge of electing Republicans to the Senate, has doubled and tripled down on his plan to end the Social Security and ...

Republicans Face Backlash for Going After Medicare and ...https://democrats.org › news › republicans-face-backlas...
Jun 15, 2022 — Lindsey Graham is facing backlash after calling for Senate Republicans to try to gut Medicare and Social Security and rip the rug out from ...

Ron Johnson Tells the T***h – and House Republicans Agreehttps://www.speaker.gov › newsroom
3 days ago — Ron Johnson let slip some t***hs about the Extreme MAGA Republican Party this week: they want to end Medicare and Social Security as we know ...

Repeal of the Retirement Earnings Test - Social Security Historyhttps://www.ssa.gov › history › houseret
The earnings penalty actually cuts Social Security benefits for many working seniors over the age of 65, and it discourages them from working. It increases ...

Republicans want to 'reform' Social Security behind closed ...https://thehill.com › opinion › congress-blog › 352537...
Jun 15, 2022 — Republican politicians are scared to death. They seek to create a smoke-filled room to provide political cover. Of what issue are they so ...

WisDems: What they're saying, U.S. Sen. Johnson threatens to ...https://www.wispolitics.com › Press Releases
7 days ago — — Yesterday, Ron Johnson doubled down on his support for cutting Social Security and Medicare, benefits that older Wisconsinites have earned ...

Meet the New GOP Plan to End Medicare, Same as the Old ...https://www.majorityleader.gov › content › meet-new-g...
That would be the same Republican budget proposal that ends the Medicare guarantee and more than doubles heath care costs for seniors, all while preserving tax ...

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

I am a Medicare & Social Security beneficiary but there will have to be curtailing of it. It is an actuarial nightmare and was right from its inception. Barry Goldwater warned about it in the 1950s and 69s and the reactions were just as hysterical as this.

Few know it but there was no altruism behind its beginning. FDR wanted to get the beneficiaries off the unemployment rolls to show that his f*****t inspired New Deal was working.

The ratio of workers to beneficiaries was very high at the time, I think 20:1. It is approaching 2:1. Even a liberal can understand that it can't go on forever.

Smedley_buzkill

Democraps.org is nothing but lies and propaganda. One of your sources,wispolitics, actually has Ron Johnson saying we need to SAVE Social Security and Medicare. You apparently didn't bother to listen to that one.
Only a Democrat would be stupid enough to believe this cherry-picked drivel.

Holdenbeach4u Loc: Holden Beach , NC

That’s an i***t statement “ Not V**e for Republicans!
Do you all want socialism in the USA.
Like the Venezuela did around 1990.
They went to “ Socialism “ , they got nothing to show for. People are staving

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

Awwwww, someone had 2 bowls of stupid before hitting send.

Liberty Tree

Democrats haved used this same scare tactic every e******n since Barry Goldwater and it has never happened. The totalitarian, destroy anyone in your way Democrats are the ones people should avoid.

Big Kahuna

The stench coming from demorats is enough to keep one from ever v****g for them. I can't think of one benefit they have offered to Americans in at least 16 years.

elledee

The demonrats have been using deception and fear for the last fifty years and now they have websites to spread all their propaganda.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

If we do nothing whiner, Social Security will not be able to payout 100% of benefits by about 2034. It's pure math. Maybe, your boy toy, imbecile Biden and his clown car of Democrats would have shored up Social Security in this massive spending Bill.

Big Kahuna

The only thing Bribem is shoring up is security for him, his family, and his corrupt Demorat party as well as all i*****l a***ns paid for by the American taxpayer.

currahee506

V**e for those American citizens running for office who want to pass and make policies that subordinate the currency printing of the "FED dollar" to the government instead of the private and global central bank.

dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA

Lawyers: Why you should never v**e for another Democrat


As an attorney, I hesitated to forward this as it can be considered to be an indictment against my profession. But I believe there is much t***h to the article below. Very thought provoking. Lawyers are adversarial and are trained to try to win at all costs. It may work in litigation but does not work well when governing our nation. Trying to win at any costs creates the polarization and hatred that now fills our country and leaves no room for common sense or legitimate debate.



Every Democrat p**********l nominee since 1984 went to law school, although Gore did not graduate. Joe Biden (no surprise) was at the bottom of his class. Every Democrat vice p**********l nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Barack Obama was a lawyer. Michelle Obama was a lawyer. Hillary Clinton was a lawyer. Bill Clinton was a lawyer. John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer. Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress: Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer is a lawyer. Former Senator Harry Reid was a lawyer.


The Republican Party is different. President Trump was a businessman. Presidents Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen. Vice President Cheney was a businessman. President Eisenhower was a 5 star General. The leaders of the Republican Revolution: Newt Gingrich was a history professor. Tom Delay was an exterminator. Dick Armey was an economist. Ex-House Minority Leader John Boehner was a plastics manufacturer. The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon. Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers. This is very interesting. I had never thought about it this way before.


The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush, and Cheney, or who heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich. The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America. And so, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, we have seen the procession of official enemies grow. Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.


This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, which, in this case should be the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side. Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation.


When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.


Today, we are drowning in laws. We are contorted by judicial decisions. We are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big. When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.


Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the t***h that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.


The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers! Tort or legal reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has been blocked from even being v**ed on by the Democrat Party. When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.

Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial

You're right, "you can't think". Sorry you have to admit it to everyone.

Ricktloml

Exactly! Venezuela was the most prosperous country in S. America until they were conned into v****g in socialism. Now, they can no longer take their children to the zoo...they had to eat the zoo animals. There was a national news story about no toilet paper. This is what the Democrat/C*******ts want for America...they want to be able to starve Americans into submission. And t*****r Joe's policies are in line to do just that

Big Kahuna

You obviously didn't read the whole sentence. That is just like a perverted Demorat to not tell the whole story. Go back and read the entire sentence ticktoc, then get back to me.