One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Challenge to all who accuse Trump of Insurrection
Page 1 of 30 next> last>>
Jul 28, 2022 09:21:15   #
David L
 
Please give us the statute number of the law that Trump has supposedly broken. Do not bother with selected news items but simply show me the law. Chapter and verse. No one has done that yet and in fact, the things they accuse Trump of doing are not illegal, even if they were true. BUT telling lies under oath IS illegal.

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 09:31:18   #
Snoopy
 
Don’t hold your breath for valid reply!

Snoopy

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 10:53:28   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
David L wrote:
Please give us the statute number of the law that Trump has supposedly broken. Do not bother with selected news items but simply show me the law. Chapter and verse. No one has done that yet and in fact, the things they accuse Trump of doing are not illegal, even if they were true. BUT telling lies under oath IS illegal.


It is up to the courts to define the violation that he is charged with if they do so.. with his background in crime he knows very well how to cover his deeds and walk that fine line. With so many people now telling the events leading up to the Jan 6th attack, we may see him charged, but that would not be a good bet.. with his power fading and the remains of the GOP looking for a replacement, if he runs, it may have to be his own party.. and he will at last fade away to obscurity..

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2022 11:02:37   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
permafrost wrote:
It is up to the courts to define the violation that he is charged with if they do so.. with his background in crime he knows very well how to cover his deeds and walk that fine line. With so many people now telling the events leading up to the Jan 6th attack, we may see him charged, but that would not be a good bet.. with his power fading and the remains of the GOP looking for a replacement, if he runs, it may have to be his own party.. and he will at last fade away to obscurity..


Courts do not define law. They uphold law.

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 11:05:03   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Courts do not define law. They uphold law.


yes, good point.. but they will be the ones defining/naming if any charges are filed..

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 11:16:01   #
American Vet
 
permafrost wrote:
It is up to the courts to define the violation that he is charged with if they do so.. with his background in crime he knows very well how to cover his deeds and walk that fine line. With so many people now telling the events leading up to the Jan 6th attack, we may see him charged, but that would not be a good bet.. with his power fading and the remains of the GOP looking for a replacement, if he runs, it may have to be his own party.. and he will at last fade away to obscurity..


LOL

Well, the CLPOS ignorant buffoon spews again. You really need to keep quite so your stupidity doesn't show.

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 11:16:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
David L wrote:
Please give us the statute number of the law that Trump has supposedly broken. Do not bother with selected news items but simply show me the law. Chapter and verse. No one has done that yet and in fact, the things they accuse Trump of doing are not illegal, even if they were true. BUT telling lies under oath IS illegal.


All you'll get is word salad. In their minds:

Statute 1 - mad about having the election rigged

Statute 2 - giving his opinion about the election being fraudulent

Statute 3 - trying to get courts to actually look at the evidence

Statute 4 - getting others to do the same

Statute 5 - organizing a protest

Statute 6 - using the words "peacefully and patriotically " in a manner which ruins the haters case against him

Statute 7 - not going away


These are the Democrat claims and they are undisputed.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2022 11:53:11   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
permafrost wrote:
It is up to the courts to define the violation that he is charged with if they do so.. with his background in crime he knows very well how to cover his deeds and walk that fine line. With so many people now telling the events leading up to the Jan 6th attack, we may see him charged, but that would not be a good bet.. with his power fading and the remains of the GOP looking for a replacement, if he runs, it may have to be his own party.. and he will at last fade away to obscurity..

Me thinks it’s the killery/Brandon crimes u have confused this with

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 12:05:44   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
All you'll get is word salad. In their minds:

Statute 1 - mad about having the election rigged

Statute 2 - giving his opinion about the election being fraudulent

Statute 3 - trying to get courts to actually look at the evidence

Statute 4 - getting others to do the same

Statute 5 - organizing a protest

Statute 6 - using the words "peacefully and patriotically " in a manner which ruins the haters case against him

Statute 7 - not going away


These are the Democrat claims and they are undisputed.
All you'll get is word salad. In their minds: br ... (show quote)



Strange how the trump troops search over his 4 years of muddling and find only two words to praise him for and think that justifies the making him a bronze calf..



Reply
Jul 28, 2022 12:07:53   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Me thinks it’s the killery/Brandon crimes u have confused this with


Those do not exist other then in your instructions.. start thinking for yourself....

As the sign says, we must focus on what matters...
As the sign says, we must focus on what matters......

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 12:43:33   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
Strange how the trump troops search over his 4 years of muddling and find only two words to praise him for and think that justifies the making him a bronze calf..


Word salad.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2022 12:53:33   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
It is up to the courts to define the violation that he is charged with if they do so.. with his background in crime he knows very well how to cover his deeds and walk that fine line. With so many people now telling the events leading up to the Jan 6th attack, we may see him charged, but that would not be a good bet.. with his power fading and the remains of the GOP looking for a replacement, if he runs, it may have to be his own party.. and he will at last fade away to obscurity..


Well, Permi, it looks like you're wrong again.
It is up to the prosecution to define the violations, then PROVE them to the court.



Reply
Jul 28, 2022 13:25:06   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
archie bunker wrote:
Well, Permi, it looks like you're wrong again.
It is up to the prosecution to define the violations, then PROVE them to the court.


Well darn, I am on a roll.... but it is the process within the court which brings the charge to record..

Geez, will admin let you show that MEME... lol...



Reply
Jul 28, 2022 13:33:42   #
AuntiE Loc: 46th Least Free State
 
permafrost wrote:
yes, good point.. but they will be the ones defining/naming if any charges are filed..


NO, they will not. Prosecutors determine what charges are brought against an individual, law school 101.

Reply
Jul 28, 2022 13:35:32   #
AuntiE Loc: 46th Least Free State
 
permafrost wrote:
Well darn, I am on a roll.... but it is the process within the court which brings the charge to record..


Only after the prosecutor presents the charges.

Quote:
Geez, will admin let you show that MEME... lol...


I pilfered your meme to send to my other feline loving friends.

Reply
Page 1 of 30 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2022 IDF International Technologies, Inc.