One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Another Win For The Constitution
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jun 23, 2022 11:45:18   #
Liberty Tree
 
The SCOTUS struck down the overly restrictive NY law on concealed weapons. Just because some abuse a right does not give cause to take away that right from others. Still waiting on Roe V. Wade decision. May the Court not cave to intimidation and continue to uphold the Cinstitution.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 12:08:57   #
okie don
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The SCOTUS struck down the overly restrictive NY law on concealed weapons. Just because some abuse a right does not give cause to take away that right from others. Still waiting on Roe V. Wade decision. May the Court not cave to intimidation and continue to uphold the Cinstitution.


SCOTUS voted 6-3 for right to carry firearm is 2nd Amendment existing right.

Boy is the NY governor pissed. LOL

Americans have right to carry weapons for protection and ability to defend yourself.
26 States now have constitutional carry rights. πŸ‘

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 12:22:20   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
okie don wrote:
SCOTUS voted 6-3 for right to carry firearm is 2nd Amendment existing right.

Boy is the NY governor pissed. LOL

Americans have right to carry weapons for protection and ability to defend yourself.
26 States now have constitutional carry rights. πŸ‘


πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘

Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2022 12:29:54   #
Liberty Tree
 
okie don wrote:
SCOTUS voted 6-3 for right to carry firearm is 2nd Amendment existing right.

Boy is the NY governor pissed. LOL

Americans have right to carry weapons for protection and ability to defend yourself.
26 States now have constitutional carry rights. πŸ‘


I thought she was going to explode. As I said in my post because someone abused a right it does not provide justification for taking that right away from others.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 13:53:25   #
Elrond51 Loc: New Mexico
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The SCOTUS struck down the overly restrictive NY law on concealed weapons. Just because some abuse a right does not give cause to take away that right from others. Still waiting on Roe V. Wade decision. May the Court not cave to intimidation and continue to uphold the Cinstitution.


Let's take that logic to another issue. Just because some people abuse the right to abortion does not give cause to take away that right from others.
I am sure the 1st thing you will say is that the Constitution doesn't mention abortion, but there are many things covered by decisions that aren't there - think Citizens United (a complete travesty).

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 14:24:21   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
okie don wrote:
SCOTUS voted 6-3 for right to carry firearm is 2nd Amendment existing right.

Boy is the NY governor pissed. LOL

Americans have right to carry weapons for protection and ability to defend yourself.
26 States now have constitutional carry rights. πŸ‘


If that dumb bitch is mad you know we received the proper decision.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 14:31:07   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Elrond51 wrote:
Let's take that logic to another issue. Just because some people abuse the right to abortion does not give cause to take away that right from others.
I am sure the 1st thing you will say is that the Constitution doesn't mention abortion, but there are many things covered by decisions that aren't there - think Citizens United (a complete travesty).


Abortion is not an "enshrined" right in the Constitution, it is a law that gives you the right to have a procedure done with certain caveats. Citizens United is no more a travesty than Public Employee Unions donating to their candidate of choice. Choice of the heads of the Unions; or the trial lawyers union. you have selective outrage.

Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2022 17:54:16   #
Elrond51 Loc: New Mexico
 
JFlorio wrote:
Abortion is not an "enshrined" right in the Constitution, it is a law that gives you the right to have a procedure done with certain caveats. Citizens United is no more a travesty than Public Employee Unions donating to their candidate of choice. Choice of the heads of the Unions; or the trial lawyers union. you have selective outrage.


You are correct about the donations. The 2nd Amendment was not intended to allow citizens to gather arsenals, therfore the current interpretation is not necessarily "enshrined" by the Constitution.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 18:25:53   #
AuntiE Loc: 46th Least Free State
 
Elrond51 wrote:
You are correct about the donations. The 2nd Amendment was not intended to allow citizens to gather arsenals, therfore the current interpretation is not necessarily "enshrined" by the Constitution.


Shall not be infringed. Need I write the definition of those words for you?

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 18:29:19   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Elrond51 wrote:
You are correct about the donations. The 2nd Amendment was not intended to allow citizens to gather arsenals, therfore the current interpretation is not necessarily "enshrined" by the Constitution.


See, that’s where you do not know your history. Our Founders absolutely wanted the citizenry armed as well as the government. The 2nd Amendment is the one Amendment that makes America unique and free. I am not worried about a tyrant from some country attacking us. I’m worried about the mini tyrants in Washington D.C. trying to erode our freedoms.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 18:31:03   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
AuntiE wrote:
Shall not be infringed. Need I write the definition of those words for you?


They’ll never understand. There will always be sheep that are willing to give up personal liberty for some promise of security.

Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2022 18:31:58   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
AuntiE wrote:
Shall not be infringed. Need I write the definition of those words for you?


You could sit the snowflakes down for an hour and explain it to 'em in small words and they still wouldn't understand.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 18:37:15   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
You could sit the snowflakes down for an hour and explain it to 'em in small words and they still wouldn't understand.


The sheep should just be thankful there are sheepdogs to keep the wolves away.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 19:03:11   #
Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana
 
JFlorio wrote:
The sheep should just be thankful there are sheepdogs to keep the wolves away.


Although, I'd let the wolves have some of 'em.

Reply
Jun 23, 2022 19:12:41   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Peaver Bogart wrote:
Although, I'd let the wolves have some of 'em.


Most of the sheep get destroyed in the end.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2022 IDF International Technologies, Inc.