ACP45 wrote:
My guess is that a majority of those who read this article would dismiss it as an "isolated" case of a wacko l*****t, and would not see the implications implied to a large segment of the radical left that has subsumed the Democratic Party. While it is never wise to make generalizations, the following point made in the article really stuck with me:
"The strategy of mass lawlessness is, at least, a brand that makes sense for Democrats who defend open borders, open-air drug use, and light-to-no punishment for felons. They justify r**ts as “mostly peaceful protests” because, to them, the ends justify the means."
Peter, Milosia, Kevyn, BadBob - care to weigh in on this?
My guess is that a majority of those who read this... (
show quote)
These 4 can't respond since they are out peacefully protesting with the other demoKraut peaceful protestors that are firebombing, l**ting, breaking windows and assaulting cops. Then they bash the J** 6th mostly peaceful protest that was really peaceful.