One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
May 14, 2022 10:50:18   #
Ricktloml
 
dtucker300 wrote:
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two g****rs, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate g****rs (based on mental health), including “ag****r, cisg****r, g****rfluid, g****rq***r, intersex, g****r nonconforming, and t*********r.”

In the l*****t zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things g****r and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or g****r.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 g****rs (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional r****m.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging r****m, as a r****t. Now, those who are dev**edly anti-r****t, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what l*****ts call r****m.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, e******y before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed r****t.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being t***smuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation eng****rs fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)



Another one of the left's main tactics is accusing others of what they themselves do

Reply
May 14, 2022 12:18:13   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Another one of the left's main tactics is accusing others of what they themselves do


It is their MO; that and fear.

Reply
May 15, 2022 10:10:12   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
dtucker300 wrote:
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two g****rs, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate g****rs (based on mental health), including “ag****r, cisg****r, g****rfluid, g****rq***r, intersex, g****r nonconforming, and t*********r.”

In the l*****t zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things g****r and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or g****r.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 g****rs (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional r****m.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging r****m, as a r****t. Now, those who are dev**edly anti-r****t, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what l*****ts call r****m.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, e******y before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed r****t.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being t***smuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation eng****rs fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)


Modern Day Sodom and Gomorrah package by the lefts higher moral authority as individuals rights, social justice at the church of humanism while trashing the ten commandments as only part of a fairytale made to hold captive their depravity. What is right or wrong is defined as what an individual believes it to be, so long as your not in disagreement with that ideological satanic beliefs system.

Reply
 
 
May 17, 2022 07:20:27   #
Army
 
America Bows To Globalism - New Treaty Will Make US Obligated To WHO Policies
News Image BY PETER HOEKSTRA/GATESTONE INSTITTE MAY 17, 2022
Share this article:
The Biden administration, it appears, unless stopped immediately, is tee-ing up America to make it easy for the Chinese C*******t Party to defeat it, and other nations, through biological warfare.

The World Health Organization (WHO), the organization that has unhesitatingly been doing China's bidding during the C***D p******c, is reportedly now planning to orchestrate a massive new power grab to internationally control the response to any future global p******c.

The plan is apparently to make the health of Americans dependent on the whims of China -- which is both actively seeking to displace the US as the world's leading superpower and has for years been working on new means of bio-warfare.

It is a plan that is being v**ed on next week: Congress and the American public need to fight vigorously -- and FAST.

On May 4, a meticulous report, Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO by Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin, raised an alarm. On May 22-28, 2022, the Biden Administration has proposed amendments to the WHO that "will empower WHO's Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation."

The danger is that China, according to reports, has actively been working on gene-splicing and globally collecting DNA with an eye to developing new lethal v***ses that could be used for bio-warfare. They would be able target people who are genetically not Chinese, while bypassing people who genetically are Chinese. China expert Gordon Chang recently warned:

For at least a half‑decade, maybe a little bit longer, Chinese military researchers have been openly writing about a new type of biological warfare. This was, for instance, in the 2017 edition of "The Science of Military Strategy," the authoritative publication of China's National Defense University.

"They talk about a new type of biological warfare of "specific ethnic genetic attacks." In other words, pathogens that will leave the Chinese immune but sicken and k**l everybody else, which means that the next disease from China can be a civilization k**ler....

A lot of military analysts talk about how the first seconds of a war with China are going to be fought in outer space. They are going to blind our satellites, take them down, do all sorts of stuff. Those statements are wrong.

The first day of war against the United States occurs about six months earlier, when they release pathogens in the United States. Then we are going to have that day in space. The war starts here, with a pathogen ‑‑ a v***s, a microbe, a bug of some kind. That is where it begins.

The Biden administration's amendment will make the US legally obligated by international treaty to follow wh**ever the WHO decides. According to the Breggins:

On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America's healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a v**e to the World Health Organization's governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).

This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO's International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as "Provisional agenda item 16.2" at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.

These amendments will empower WHO's Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.

If passed, the Biden Administration's proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.'s 193 member nations, all of whom belong WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population....

These regulations are a "binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007." U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them....

The targeted nation is also required to send WHO any relevant genetic sequence data.

Worse:

The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12, 2022, leaving little time to protest before the scheduled v**e.

The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation's alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostr****m and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.

In addition:

The sweeping new powers will be invested in the Director-General of WHO to act on his own. The Director-General is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, commonly known as Tedros. Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese C*******t Party.

And:

Under the new regulations, WHO will not be required to consult with the identified nation beforehand to "verify" the event before taking action.

In 2020, the Trump administration initiated pulling the U.S. out of the WHO because of its wretched track record during the C***D p******c. It was slow to identify the threat of C***D, and differential to the wishes of the Chinese C*******t Party (CCP) in its messaging about C***D despite questions from Taiwan about the human-to-human t***smissibility of the v***s, which the CCP was falsely denying and the WHO simply ignored.

The WHO was also unable to convince the CCP for the need for greater t***sparency, or even allow an open discussion about the origins of the v***s. Early on, the WHO embraced the CCP narrative that the v***s had developed naturally, and attacked any mention that the v***s might have escaped from a Chinese laboratory in W***n.

Memories of how the global community responded to the p******c are still fresh in everyone's mind. Many members of the diplomatic corps in the Netherlands, at the time, acknowledged the poor record of the WHO but believed that pulling out of the WHO during the p******c would be a mistake. They also believed an after-action review of the WHO would have to wait until the p******c was under control; then there could be accountability and reform for this failed organization.

Boy, were they wrong. As the p******c is now waning, instead of an accountability review, the WHO and member states are envisioning a massive expansion of its role as an international organization to control the planet during the next p******c.

Unfortunately, this "next p******c" is neither far off nor a hypothetical "conspiracy theory." According to multiple credible reports from the U.S. Department of State, to the executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Peter Jennings, China has been preparing for bio-warfare using pathogens for more than six years.

The United Nations has been furthering this scheme. According to the Breggins:

On January 26, 2022, the same U. S. Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva sent a one-page memo to WHO confirming that the amendments had been sent. It also contained a brief report by the same Loyce Pace, Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs HHS. Most importantly, the memo listed all the nations backing the U.S. amendments. The size and power of the group guarantee that the amendments will be passed if unopposed by significant outside pressure.

Here are the 20 nations, plus the European Union, listed by the U.S. as supporting the amendments:

Albania, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, India, Jamaica, Japan, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Peru, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Member States of the European Union (EU).

The European Union, a g*******t organization, has been among the biggest backers of increasing WHO"s global power.

China has, for years, been "collecting the DNA of foreigners while prohibiting Chinese DNA to foreign researchers," according to Chang. He added that the country's behavior of collecting the DNA of foreigners while prohibiting Chinese DNA to foreign researchers supports this theory.

"We've got to be extremely concerned because that is not consistent with a country that wants to cooperate with the rest of the world. That is consistent with a country developing biological weapons," he cautioned.

"People have said biological weapons don't work. Well, we do know they work because we had the c****av***s, which may or may not have been a biological weapon," Chang clarified, "but we do know that it crippled the United States and that's what Beijing is really looking for.

Unfortunately, the evidence is overwhelming. On May 7, 2021, journalist Sharri Markson disclosed in The Australian that:

Chinese military scientists discussed the weaponisation of SARS c****av***ses five years before the C****-** p******c, outlining their ideas in a document that predicted a third world war would be fought with biological weapons.

The document, written by People's Liberation Army scientists and senior Chinese public health officials in 2015, was obtained by the US State Department as it conducted an investigation into the origins of C****-**, The Weekend Australian has confirmed.

The Australian added: "Robert Potter, a digital forensics specialist who has worked for the US, Australian and Canadian governments, and has previously analysed leaked Chinese government documents, verified the ­authenticity of the document,"

Despite its obvious failures and kowtowing to the Chinese C*******t Party, there are nevertheless those -- one can only imagine why -- who apparently see a WHO ruled by China as capable of assuming this global role.

These countries have sought to expand the authorities of the WHO to include legally binding requirements on all nations, a financial structure that will stabilize its position, and the ability to establish tools, norms, and protocols internationally for the next p******c. This is how the WHO, and some member states, see the future of the WHO -- an unt***sparent, unaccountable international organization able to establish by edict how the world and nations must respond to future health crises.

Countries regrettably embracing this call include the UK, France, Germany, the Netherlands, as well as the head of the European Union. Although it does not seem logical, these countries -- apart from the UK which by now should know better -- have historically put unfounded faith in the success and primacy of international organizations.

The refrain often offered in diplomatic circles when discussing failed international organizations is "better together." Better to be talking in the confines of failed or failing international organizations than to fight for reform, which might require pulling out of them to create the type of pressure that would force change. Many countries promised to join the U.S. in fighting to reform the WHO once the p******c ended. They are now fighting to expand its authority -- with no reform.

A WHO with expanded authority is a terrifying concept. Can you envision providing an international organization with the power to dictate how the U.S. should responds to a future p******c? Perhaps by forcing the U.S. to turn over supplies and equipment to China because of its larger population?

Especially at a time when reports are that China is working on a v***s that is even more lethal? How about an international organization that would have the power to mandate whether we should be required to be v******ted with a particular v*****e, say China's inferior SINOVAC v*****e? Or imagine a WHO that has the power to impose what mandates or lockdowns a country would be required to impose, say like China's current lockdown of Shanghai?

Unfortunately, the WHO already has proven itself to be a willing organ of China's C*******t leaders. Providing it with international, legal binding authority over global p******c response must never be allowed to happen. No country should ever give away its potential right to survival to any other country.

We are seeing now how this cavalier abdication of sovereign, national responsibility is playing out with the world's betrayal of Ukraine, which gave up its nuclear arsenal in the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 in exchange for f**e promises -- from countries including Russia -- that its borders and sovereignty would be protected and secure.

The WHO, unaccountable for its performance, is not the kind of authority we as Americans should want to see in an unt***sparent, unaccountable organization, especially one that appears beholden to the Chinese C*******t Party.

The WHO is opportunistically using the C***D p******c to try to expand its reach and authority. The closing remarks of WHO's director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, at the December meeting of the World Health Assembly, were: "We are one humanity. We have one planet. We have one health. And we have one WHO. Your WHO."

Congress and the Biden Administration should not succumb to this latest siren song for globalism -- or any other, frankly. America works best when it leads within the international community, not when it cedes national authority to unt***sparent, unaccountable organizations, particularly those which have shown that they have China's -- not America's -- best interests at heart.

Originally published at Gatestone Institute - reposted with permission

Reply
May 19, 2022 05:14:18   #
Army
 
https://blueanon.news/boebert-blasts-biden-for-censorship-moves-to-dismantle-ministry-of-t***h/

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 08:49:53   #
Army
 
dtucker300 wrote:
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two g****rs, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate g****rs (based on mental health), including “ag****r, cisg****r, g****rfluid, g****rq***r, intersex, g****r nonconforming, and t*********r.”

In the l*****t zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things g****r and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or g****r.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 g****rs (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional r****m.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging r****m, as a r****t. Now, those who are dev**edly anti-r****t, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what l*****ts call r****m.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, e******y before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed r****t.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being t***smuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation eng****rs fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
L*****ts Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)


Good points 👍
Here some more Musk an his Witch girlfriend want you God given DNA want to turn you into a butterfly . Evil stuff

https://tv.gab.com/channel/watchnewvids/view/suspicious-elon-musk-and-grimes-62aa6bb51dd57aa3c7f18fe2

Reply
Jul 3, 2022 09:47:19   #
EmilyD
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I find this shocking for another woman to be against womens rights.
You must be part of the
Republican hand maiden brigade.

I am a woman, and a mother and I am for the baby's body and the BABY'S RIGHT to live!!

I don't care what you say about blobs of cells or anything else you call a fertilized fetus. I call it a baby, and I will fight for their lives as if it were my own!

And TOUGH 💩 if you don't like it.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2022 09:59:41   #
EmilyD
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Womens Rights are Womens rights.
They don’t need you or anyone else.
Their body their choice.
And 5 people fo not have a right to take away these rights that were so hard fought.
It isn’t up to anyone else to decide .
We don’t need no stinking sharia law in this country .
And yes it is sharia law for a religious sect to dictate policy concerning womens rights.


Federalizing Roe was corrected by the overturning. A******n laws are now back at State level where they should have been since this "mistake" was made by SCOTUS in 1973.

THIS ISN'T ABOUT WOMEN'S RIGHTS! It's about fixing something that was broken.

Reply
Jul 4, 2022 02:27:54   #
Army
 
EmilyD wrote:
I am a woman, and a mother and I am for the baby's body and the BABY'S RIGHT to live!!

I don't care what you say about blobs of cells or anything else you call a fertilized fetus. I call it a baby, and I will fight for their lives as if it were my own!

And TOUGH 💩 if you don't like it.


You go Girl ! There satanist you know what the Bible says if they don't listen brush your feet off an go on . They aren't going listen sound doctrine .
I have the greatest respect for Moms I had one thank God for it an Dad to satan don't don't want you to have a heavenly Father or earthy Dad even Mother . These k**lers here don't believe in moral life or family & commandments they like legalism legalitys we know the problems of that & politics & people that have died from that an still through history from the first murder of Cain & Abel. We know it's a sacrifice to the devil an even ate the baby's to an sure others even still today going on .People most are to blind to see it . The key of Hells been opened now seeing all kinds of A*********ns . Deuteronomy 18:9-12

https://tv.gab.com/channel/watchnewvids/view/suspicious-elon-musk-and-grimes-62aa6bb51dd57aa3c7f18fe2

Elon Musk as a kid claims has said
I know he carried diamonds or emeralds Ruby's or what ever in his lunch box he says but I wonder still if he's really human may sound crazy to some but we are now living in science fiction reality . The key of hell has been opened the a*********ns seeing now . Deuteronomy 18:9-12 things we never thought we would ever see familiar spirits ( don't communicate with the dead ) We have AI now an Google's working on dead family members voices to talk you with Alexis robots feeling talking show expressions think feel go to War speak , interaction they will become legal an classified as human if you know what I am saying along with t***shumanism , sex dummy's partners making new forms of life out of DNA plant & animals now humans to

Reply
Jul 5, 2022 21:15:28   #
Army
 
Sick Obiden & Obama girl claims raped her sex s***es

https://bestnewshere.com/joe-biden-butt-naked-and-whipping-a-young-woman-another-young-woman-says-she-was-sold-to-joe-biden-several-times-had-sex-with-biden-and-obama-and-reveals-details-of-underworld-under-los-ange/

Reply
Jul 6, 2022 00:21:43   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 


Millions? A bit hyperbolic. I can believe hundreds. Maybe thousands.



Reply
 
 
Jul 6, 2022 05:16:36   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Millions? A bit hyperbolic. I can believe hundreds. Maybe thousands.


That's is exactly right!!

Reply
Jul 6, 2022 11:35:25   #
Army
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Millions? A bit hyperbolic. I can believe hundreds. Maybe thousands.


Right agree & c*******t

Reply
Jul 7, 2022 21:09:26   #
Army
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/georgia-guidestones-explosion-investigation-latest-b2117353.html

Reply
Jul 13, 2022 17:39:37   #
Army
 
There plan a world social credit system

https://youtu.be/4LH8zUoHTQQ

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.