One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 13, 2022 15:48:27   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two genders, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate genders (based on mental health), including “agender, cisgender, genderfluid, genderqueer, intersex, gender nonconforming, and transgender.”

In the leftist zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things gender and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or gender.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 genders (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional racism.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging racism, as a racist. Now, those who are devotedly anti-racist, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what leftists call racism.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, equality before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed racist.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being transmuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation engenders fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.

Reply
May 13, 2022 16:09:04   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two genders, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate genders (based on mental health), including “agender, cisgender, genderfluid, genderqueer, intersex, gender nonconforming, and transgender.”

In the leftist zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things gender and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or gender.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 genders (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional racism.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging racism, as a racist. Now, those who are devotedly anti-racist, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what leftists call racism.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, equality before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed racist.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being transmuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation engenders fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
Leftists Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)



Reply
May 13, 2022 16:31:28   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two genders, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate genders (based on mental health), including “agender, cisgender, genderfluid, genderqueer, intersex, gender nonconforming, and transgender.”

In the leftist zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things gender and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or gender.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 genders (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional racism.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging racism, as a racist. Now, those who are devotedly anti-racist, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what leftists call racism.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, equality before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed racist.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being transmuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation engenders fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
Leftists Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)


Definitely!!

Reply
 
 
May 13, 2022 16:33:30   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two genders, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate genders (based on mental health), including “agender, cisgender, genderfluid, genderqueer, intersex, gender nonconforming, and transgender.”

In the leftist zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things gender and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or gender.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 genders (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional racism.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging racism, as a racist. Now, those who are devotedly anti-racist, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what leftists call racism.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, equality before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed racist.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being transmuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation engenders fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
Leftists Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)



Womens Rights are Womens rights.
They don’t need you or anyone else.
Their body their choice.
And 5 people fo not have a right to take away these rights that were so hard fought.
It isn’t up to anyone else to decide .
We don’t need no stinking sharia law in this country .
And yes it is sharia law for a religious sect to dictate policy concerning womens rights.

Reply
May 13, 2022 16:46:23   #
Bevvy
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two genders, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate genders (based on mental health), including “agender, cisgender, genderfluid, genderqueer, intersex, gender nonconforming, and transgender.”

In the leftist zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things gender and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or gender.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 genders (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional racism.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging racism, as a racist. Now, those who are devotedly anti-racist, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what leftists call racism.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, equality before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed racist.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being transmuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation engenders fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
Leftists Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)



Reply
May 13, 2022 16:46:49   #
Bevvy
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Womens Rights are Womens rights.
They don’t need you or anyone else.
Their body their choice.
And 5 people fo not have a right to take away these rights that were so hard fought.
It isn’t up to anyone else to decide .
We don’t need no stinking sharia law in this country .
And yes it is sharia law for a religious sect to dictate policy concerning womens rights.



Reply
May 13, 2022 16:56:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Womens Rights are Womens rights.
They don’t need you or anyone else.
Their body their choice.
And 5 people fo not have a right to take away these rights that were so hard fought.
It isn’t up to anyone else to decide .
We don’t need no stinking sharia law in this country .
And yes it is sharia law for a religious sect to dictate policy concerning womens rights.


Define woman. Define female.

Reply
 
 
May 13, 2022 17:14:30   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Womens Rights are Womens rights.
They don’t need you or anyone else.
Their body their choice.
And 5 people fo not have a right to take away these rights that were so hard fought.
It isn’t up to anyone else to decide .
We don’t need no stinking sharia law in this country .
And yes it is sharia law for a religious sect to dictate policy concerning womens rights.


More rambling nonsense

Reply
May 13, 2022 17:15:43   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Leftists Twist Words and Laws
Posted Friday, May 13, 2022 | By AMAC, Robert B. Charles

Much of what passes for logical, progressive, legal thinking is none of those – it is illogical, regressive, and twists the law. No one will say this, but the left is setting up twisted liability. Those meant to be protected are being hurt. Examples are legion – and demand attention.

Years ago, in response to sexual harassment in the workplace and schools, state and federal laws emerged to protect those needing protection, chiefly women and girls. A central tenet of these laws and cases was the “hostile environment,” which tolerated discrimination.

Fast forward to 2022. Laws protecting women are bending back on themselves, thanks to the left. They are being used against biological women and girls in education, not for them.

Title IX lawsuits that empower biological girls by preventing the denial of separate female teams, locker rooms, bathrooms, and competitive environments are now about to be used against biological girls and those who defend them as the Biden Administration redefines Title IX.

Where humanity and law have long understood two genders, male and female, across the animal kingdom, the left indulges radical redefinition, asserting 72 separate genders (based on mental health), including “agender, cisgender, genderfluid, genderqueer, intersex, gender nonconforming, and transgender.”

In the leftist zeitgeist of this era, mass-redefinition of all things gender and race to border protection and legitimate causes for disaffection, boys and girls no longer exist – except, of course, they do.

This has significant implications for the application of historically clear laws in utterly unforeseen situations. Thus, a boy who believes he is a girl can now assert the right to compete in girls’ sports and soon sue for Title IX violation if blocked – after the Biden Administration redefinition.

The implications are not good, and not thought out. While some accommodation for emotional and mental dysphoria may be fitting, disenfranchisement of all biological girls – and sudden liability for those who defend biological girls – makes no sense.

The law is being twisted in a way that turns Title IX’s shield to protect girls into a sword to impale them, deter them, demotivate, disenfranchise, and victimize them.

But this is just the start. Think about the entire body of laws called “hostile educational environment” and civil rights that focus on protecting biological women from discrimination rooted in prejudice toward their biological femininity or gender.

Suddenly, these laws can be used against biological women – who have long counted on their anti-discrimination provisions. Instead, 71 genders (or however many one imagines) can now sue biological girls, women, and those who defend them, using the very laws meant to protect them.

Go a step further. Look at the twisted way of thinking the modern left – the Democrat Party – is now giving us, allowing the application of other laws wholly out of context.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) involves teaching that racial identity unchangeably defines one’s potential for success in society, however, measured. In effect, using the Marxist principle of immutable classes, CRT teaches unchangeable institutional racism.

Now, imagine that you are someone who disagrees with the idea that race defines human potential, but with the idea – embodied in our Constitution – that God gives all humans an equal right to success and that society should work to assure that God-given promise gets fulfilled.

In effect, you are anti-CRT, which means that you are viewed by those who teach this brand of Marxism, based on teaching unchanging racism, as a racist. Now, those who are devotedly anti-racist, who subscribe to the Constitutional promises of equal protection and individual liberty unrelated to race, are liable for promoting what leftists call racism.

In other words, laws that push equal opportunity, equality before the law, and constitutional norms that elevate the individual regardless of skin color, are now presumed racist.

Shift again to ideas like citizenship, which is constantly being transmuted, watered down, and given away to those who can crash the border and get here physically but have no legal claim to citizenship or its benefits. The left now empowers them with civil rights, used against citizens.

Shift again to criminal law and consider the way in which basic ideas are being twisted. A biologically female child (unfortunately this has happened) who is assaulted in a girl’s bathroom or locker room by a biological boy who “identifies” as a girl, is now disadvantaged by the idea that the assault was somehow not the school’s fault. Plainly, occurring where it did, with permission given by the school for deep privacy violations, it was.

And think about how the law of assault, which involves putting another person in fear – a reasonable person being in fear – is being twisted.

A girl is no longer expected to entertain any kind of fear when confronted by a biological boy in her bathroom. She is deemed to be the offender, her fear unreasonable if she suggests as that the situation engenders fear. Is that reasonable? Defensible? No, of course not.

What is happening is that basic words, long used in the law in predictable, acceptable, understood ways – are changing. Expectations of what is reasonable are being changed by the left, as well as expectations of privacy, safety, respect, and healthy child development.

Where does all this lead? Back to start, back to a reexamination of what kind of society we wish to live in, one that understands reasonable expectations and majority sensibilities as defining forces, or one that is prepared to throw everything away, from boys and girls to assault.

Perhaps the most prominent unspoken fact is the political left misapplying long-established words and laws in ways that hurt those meant to be protected – girls, women, citizens. The time is now to say words, laws, biology, borders, and safety have real meanings. Time to strop twisting them.
Leftists Twist Words and Laws br Posted Friday, Ma... (show quote)


Dtucker, that one hit the nail on the head. Well said.

Reply
May 13, 2022 17:18:30   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Dtucker, that one hit the nail on the head. Well said.


Obviously, because it raised the hackles on Milosia's neck.

Reply
May 13, 2022 17:58:50   #
Army
 
Subject: A Hallmark Family Movie in the making!
Biden Family





Maybe a Hallmark Family Movie will be made out of this:

Just imagine if this was a trump child……every news network would be on this story and by now he would have been indicted and found guilty with all the evidence from his own laptop.


Here is a story: Joe Biden and his first wife, Neilia, had three children: Hunter, Beau and Naomi. In 1972, his wife Neilia and Naomi, tragically died in a car accident.

Joe eventually married a woman named Jill (his current wife, the "Doctor”).
Joe already knew Jill because she had been Hunter's babysitter. (Yeah, THAT seems like something out of "Father Knows Best" - marry the babysitter). They had a daughter named Ashley, who lives 'a quiet life' and is frequently in and out of rehab for various substance abuse issues.

Now sadly, the sanest, most normal one of the 3 surviving kids, Beau, died in 2015 from a brain tumor. He had been married to Hallie and they had 2 children, a boy and a girl named Natalie, who was 11 yrs old when her dad died.

Enter Hunter Biden, in 2015, to "comfort" his brother's widow. Mind you, Hunter is married at the time, to Kathleen Biden, since 1993. He starts screwing around with his dead brother's wife in 2015 ... Hunter's wife Kathleen finds out about it and they separate. Hunter moves in with his dead brother's wife, Hallie, and her two kids, and they have a grand old time.

Hunter ultimately gets divorced from Kathleen in 2017 But, before that happens….

Hunter starts screwing around with a stripper, while still shacking up with his dead brother's wife, before his divorce is finalized, and gets the stripper pregnant. Haillie kicks his butt to the curb supposedly for this indiscretion in 2018.

OK, at this point in the drama, he is still legally married to his first wife, living with his widowed sister-in-law, and has knocked up a pole dancer. You following this? Can you begin to imagine if that was one of Trump's sons?


He denies the stripper's baby is his, although a paternity test proves otherwise and eventually he marries yet another woman named Melissa in 2019 after knowing her for 6 days… and should you NOT believe all that you’ve just read, go to Google and put this in:
hunter biden wives and girlfriends

Does the fairy tale end there? Why no, no it doesn't.

This just sets the stage…

Enter the laptop from hell ... loaded with emails, text messages, photos, child pornography, videos, and other sordid digital images of drug use and rampant weirdness….

Hunter Biden dropped the laptop off in Delaware, his home state, to get it repaired. It seems he dropped it in some water while in a meth-induced state of mind. He then neglected to pay the $85.00 repair fee and the laptop became the repair shop owner's property for non-payment.

When the owner saw what was on it, he was so disturbed that he contacted the FBI. No response, it wasn't a "noose" hanging in a NASCAR garage. The DOJ? No response, it didn't involve Trump's tax returns.

Eventually, it landed in Rudy Giuliani's possession and he turned it over to the Delaware State Police AFTER making 4 copies of the hard drive.

Turns out, there's quite a lot of child pornography on there ... much of it involving youngsters on Hunter's many trips to China.

The Chinese Communist Party uses this as a blackmail tactic ... They supply the young girls, they film you, unknowingly, and then they can keep you "in line", while paying you the big $$$ to do their bidding, like lucrative deals with your VP father.

Millions of dollars were paid to Hunter Biden for favors with the US. government while Joe Biden was VP under Obama.
For 8 years Hunter made the contacts and split the money with his father, referred to as the "Big Guy" in all emails detailing how their ill-gotten gains would be split up amongst all the criminals involved.


Joe Biden sold out his country and used his meth head son to do it. Biden is as dirty and crooked as they come.

Reply
 
 
May 13, 2022 18:47:44   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Define woman. Define female.


No need , if you don’t know what they are then you should definitely stay out of their budiness,

Reply
May 13, 2022 18:51:37   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Bevvy wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


I find this shocking for another woman to be against womens rights.
You must be part of the
Republican hand maiden brigade.

Reply
May 13, 2022 23:45:57   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Milosia2 wrote:
No need , if you don’t know what they are then you should definitely stay out of their budiness,


Point is, can you? Obviously you understand my question and it's relevance. Let's hear it. Youz are so woke. Define female.

Reply
May 14, 2022 00:41:03   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I find this shocking for another woman to be against womens rights.
You must be part of the
Republican hand maiden brigade.


Like the Democrat women who dismissed Tara Reid's allegation that Biden accosted her?

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2022 IDF International Technologies, Inc.