The President of U.S. can't do anything right with the U.S. Congress we have: Now 99 percent of the posts send in the Political Forum are attacking President Barack W. Obama only, but...

Jerry A. Loc: California

Now 99 percent of the posts send in the Political Forum are attacking President Barack W. Obama only, but nobody mentioned the corruption in both political party Republicans & Democrats in Congress and the torrent of Corporate $$$$ money paid to members of U.S. Congress to pass the best laws money can buy to hurt the poor and feed the rich only, according to our U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2010 in Citizens United V. FEC that overturned longstanding precedent prohibiting corporations from spending their general treasury funds in our elections that presents a serious and direct threat to our Democracy and self-government.

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

Jerry A. wrote:

Now 99 percent of the posts send in the Political ... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

MrEd Loc: Georgia

Jerry A. wrote:

Now 99 percent of the posts send in the Political ... (show quote)

Well, if this is truly the case with you, then may I suggest you do a lot more work on your reading comprehension.

Jerry A. Loc: California

MrEd wrote:

Well, if this is truly the case with you, then may I suggest you do a lot more work on your reading comprehension.

MrEd. I suggest to you to engage your brain before send any posts in the Political Forum.

Jerry A. Loc: California

MrEd wrote:

Well, if this is truly the case with you, then may I suggest you do a lot more work on your reading comprehension.

MrEd. I suggest to you to engage your brain before send any posts in the Political Forum.

richard0135 Loc: little rock, arkansas

I believe Obama was elected in 2008, and spent a billion dollars. seems like didn't hurt the dem's too much

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

Jerry A. wrote:

Now 99 percent of the posts send in the Political ... (show quote)

Barack W. Obama ?

Mary95

He did get someone to spend hours at an ATM and cash in all those Anonymous prepaid debit cards. But really, how would we know if Saudi or Soros threw him a few million without putting it on the books?

Theo Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida

Jerry A. wrote:

MrEd. I suggest to you to engage your brain before send any posts in the Political Forum.

I suggest you read Mr. Ed's post with a clear head. He is simply trying to tell you in an abbreviated post, "look at more threads before you claim no one is talking about all those other bad politicians."

Mr. Ed was correct, and you are insulting. Lighten up just a tad, and you might even promote some lively discussion. Otherwise, you go on my ignore list. (Of course, that might play right into your scheme).

Jerry A. Loc: California

Theo wrote:

I suggest you read Mr. Ed's post with a clear head. He is simply trying to tell you in an abbreviated post, "look at more threads before you claim no one is talking about all those other bad politicians."

Mr. Ed was correct, and you are insulting. Lighten up just a tad, and you might even promote some lively discussion. Otherwise, you go on my ignore list. (Of course, that might play right into your scheme).

Theo: I read every post in the Political Forum and I am sick and tired of the stupidities send by cultural inferior people that MAKE NO SENSE.

Jerry A. Loc: California

richard0135 wrote:

I believe Obama was elected in 2008, and spent a billion dollars. seems like didn't hurt the dem's too much

Every politician elected spent millions of U.S. dollars provided by the special interest to manipulate them Republicans & Democrats and the american people voted for them. U.S.A. is going to hell economically, politically, and morally regardless who is elected.

Jerry A. Loc: California

Mary95 wrote:

He did get someone to spend hours at an ATM and cash in all those Anonymous prepaid debit cards. But really, how would we know if Saudi or Soros threw him a few million without putting it on the books?

Can you explain more clearly what you are saying about Saidi and Soros in your post. Please.

Theo Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida

Jerry A. wrote:

Theo: I read every post in the Political Forum and I am sick and tired of the stupidities send by cultural inferior people that MAKE NO SENSE.

THAT's fair. I was responding to your post which could have said this to Mr. Ed. I would have no objection. But I read your post as unfair. I rescind that evaluation as I am in agreement with this explanation; with the disclaimer, that I see much that is hope, besides a lot that is waste of space.

Jerry A. Loc: California

Theo wrote:

THAT's fair. I was responding to your post which could have said this to Mr. Ed. I would have no objection. But I read your post as unfair. I rescind that evaluation as I am in agreement with this explanation; with the disclaimer, that I see much that is hope, besides a lot that is waste of space.

Another post that make no sense, I am sorry.

Theo Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida

Jerry A. wrote:

Another post that make no sense, I am sorry.

Sorry 'bout that. I will try to make it both understandable and agreeable -

Jerry A. wrote:

Theo: I read every post in the Political Forum and I am sick and tired of the stupidities send by cultural inferior people that MAKE NO SENSE.

To which I responded -

theo wrote:

THAT's fair. I was responding to your post which could have said this to Mr. Ed. I would have no objection. But I read your post as unfair. I rescind that evaluation as I am in agreement with this explanation; with the disclaimer, that I see much that is hope, besides a lot that is waste of space.

o.k. let's watch the message unfold

"THAT's fair."

That means I re-evaluated my assessment of your response to Mr. Ed. Because I had new information to consider. I considered it. I considered your response to Mr. Ed "fair" in the light of what was to me, new information.

"I was responding to your post which could have said this to Mr. Ed."

I was trying to convey the concept that if you had said this to Mr. Ed, it might have brought out a different response, instead of one that appeared more as hostility.

"I would have no objection. But I read your post as unfair. I rescind that evaluation as I am in agreement with this explanation; with the disclaimer, that I see much that is hope, besides a lot that is waste of space."

This simply shows my agreement, (no objection to your post) because I understood more about what you were saying. I therefore rescinded my previous assessment, ( I changed my mind about your post) but I added a disclaimer (this means I did not agree with out explanation)
"I see much that is hope, besides a lot that is waste of space" is simply saying that while I agree with your assessment to a point, I still see hope where you see only "stuff" better left unsaid. Furthermore, I also see some of that "Stuff" better left unsaid.

It was a post mostly agreeing with what you said, but with some hope in sight.