One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why We’re Revisiting the JFK Assassination
Jan 18, 2022 19:32:56   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
Why We’re Revisiting the JFK Assassination

No matter your perspective, you’re probably asking yourself: Why in the world is WhoWhatWhy publishing a series about the John F. Kennedy assassination now?

Why, with so many crises clamoring for attention, focus on a tragedy dating back almost 60 years? The answer, it turns out, can be found right in those fresh crises.

Today, America is divided as perhaps never before seen in our lifetimes, with an epic disagreement over the most basic of facts, including who rightfully should wield power.

Yet, to this day, a majority of Americans of all belief sets share a common creed: They do not buy the official explanation for the violent t******r of p***r occasioned by the murder of the 35th president.

The loss of confidence in the establishment, in the media, in v****g systems, and in credentialed “expertise” has its roots in lies of long ago. Sadly, those unresolved lies are now being exploited by the cynical for their own purposes. One result is the demonstrably baseless claim that Donald Trump actually won in 2020.

This much is clear: The Kennedy assassination is an ongoing study in the power of misinformation. After all these years, most media continue to dismiss widespread — and justifiable — public skepticism of the Warren Commission report, with its urgency to rubber stamp J. Edgar Hoover’s non-investigation “investigation” that laid the tragedy solely at the feet of Lee Harvey Oswald, the “disgruntled loner seeking attention,” who bafflingly told police he did not do it. In fact, he declared himself “just a patsy.”

That story never made sense on any level, and the evidence points to more powerful — and more likely — suspects. Yet it remains the song sung by Washington and by the consensus-seeking media, and that leaves the field open to truly dubious “theories,” like the suggestion put forward last month — this time not by Trump but by his supposedly more credible enemies — that the real culprit behind the assassination might actually be a familiar bogeyman: Russia.

Cleaning up the tangle of underbrush from our murky history can go a long way to establishing the primacy of carefully documented facts over lies, innuendo, and cover-up by all parties.

Moreover, the Kennedy assassination story is not ancient, static history. It has never stopped unfolding. In 1992, Congress, responding to a wave of public interest following Oliver Stone’s feature film JFK, unanimously passed the JFK Records Act, mandating full disclosure of all government documents related to Kennedy’s death. Yet 30 years after that law passed, the authorities — principally the American spy agencies — are still d**gging their feet, releasing batches only sporadically while still withholding thousands of documents, and blacking out information in thousands more.

Stone, troubled by the lack of progress, is back with his latest look at the evidence, this time in a documentary. At WhoWhatWhy, we’re also remaining active on this front. Currently, we are examining the latest document release from December 2021. And we’re keeping a sharp eye out for supposedly exemplary establishment “historians” and “experts” who peddle new, dangerous lies — like blaming Kennedy’s death on Russia — a reckless stratagem now that the US and Russia find themselves again edging toward the brink.

It is with this background in mind that we invite you to read a new series of articles on the topic, which we will be posting throughout the week.

Today:

Revisiting JFK: Oliver Stone’s thorough debunking of the Warren Commission report is required viewing for all Americans.
https://whowhatwhy.org/culture/journalism-media/why-jfk-revisited-is-necessary/
Who’s Afraid of JFK Revisited? The Washington Post — and the CIA.
https://whowhatwhy.org/culture/journalism-media/on-jfk-washington-post-deserves-pinocchio-award/
Wednesday:

What the media keeps getting wrong about the JFK records story.
Thursday:

The new “big lie” about the JFK assassination: blaming Russia.

https://whowhatwhy.org/justice/why-were-revisiting-the-jfk-assassination/?utm_source=WhoWhatWhy+Now&utm_campaign=6352771092-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2_1_2021_16_41_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6b3f79a618-6352771092-251332769



Reply
Jan 18, 2022 20:11:59   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Why We’re Revisiting the JFK Assassination

No matter your perspective, you’re probably asking yourself: Why in the world is WhoWhatWhy publishing a series about the John F. Kennedy assassination now?

Why, with so many crises clamoring for attention, focus on a tragedy dating back almost 60 years? The answer, it turns out, can be found right in those fresh crises.

Today, America is divided as perhaps never before seen in our lifetimes, with an epic disagreement over the most basic of facts, including who rightfully should wield power.

Yet, to this day, a majority of Americans of all belief sets share a common creed: They do not buy the official explanation for the violent t******r of p***r occasioned by the murder of the 35th president.

The loss of confidence in the establishment, in the media, in v****g systems, and in credentialed “expertise” has its roots in lies of long ago. Sadly, those unresolved lies are now being exploited by the cynical for their own purposes. One result is the demonstrably baseless claim that Donald Trump actually won in 2020.

This much is clear: The Kennedy assassination is an ongoing study in the power of misinformation. After all these years, most media continue to dismiss widespread — and justifiable — public skepticism of the Warren Commission report, with its urgency to rubber stamp J. Edgar Hoover’s non-investigation “investigation” that laid the tragedy solely at the feet of Lee Harvey Oswald, the “disgruntled loner seeking attention,” who bafflingly told police he did not do it. In fact, he declared himself “just a patsy.”

That story never made sense on any level, and the evidence points to more powerful — and more likely — suspects. Yet it remains the song sung by Washington and by the consensus-seeking media, and that leaves the field open to truly dubious “theories,” like the suggestion put forward last month — this time not by Trump but by his supposedly more credible enemies — that the real culprit behind the assassination might actually be a familiar bogeyman: Russia.

Cleaning up the tangle of underbrush from our murky history can go a long way to establishing the primacy of carefully documented facts over lies, innuendo, and cover-up by all parties.

Moreover, the Kennedy assassination story is not ancient, static history. It has never stopped unfolding. In 1992, Congress, responding to a wave of public interest following Oliver Stone’s feature film JFK, unanimously passed the JFK Records Act, mandating full disclosure of all government documents related to Kennedy’s death. Yet 30 years after that law passed, the authorities — principally the American spy agencies — are still d**gging their feet, releasing batches only sporadically while still withholding thousands of documents, and blacking out information in thousands more.

Stone, troubled by the lack of progress, is back with his latest look at the evidence, this time in a documentary. At WhoWhatWhy, we’re also remaining active on this front. Currently, we are examining the latest document release from December 2021. And we’re keeping a sharp eye out for supposedly exemplary establishment “historians” and “experts” who peddle new, dangerous lies — like blaming Kennedy’s death on Russia — a reckless stratagem now that the US and Russia find themselves again edging toward the brink.

It is with this background in mind that we invite you to read a new series of articles on the topic, which we will be posting throughout the week.

Today:

Revisiting JFK: Oliver Stone’s thorough debunking of the Warren Commission report is required viewing for all Americans.
https://whowhatwhy.org/culture/journalism-media/why-jfk-revisited-is-necessary/
Who’s Afraid of JFK Revisited? The Washington Post — and the CIA.
https://whowhatwhy.org/culture/journalism-media/on-jfk-washington-post-deserves-pinocchio-award/
Wednesday:

What the media keeps getting wrong about the JFK records story.
Thursday:

The new “big lie” about the JFK assassination: blaming Russia.

https://whowhatwhy.org/justice/why-were-revisiting-the-jfk-assassination/?utm_source=WhoWhatWhy+Now&utm_campaign=6352771092-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2_1_2021_16_41_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6b3f79a618-6352771092-251332769
Why We’re Revisiting the JFK Assassination br br ... (show quote)


It was not Russia. This is only another smokescreen put out to throw the dogs off the scent.
Russ Baker at WhoWhatWhy is an esteemed investigative journalist who has received numerous awards for his work. He is not done right wing hack with an agenda.
His investigations have produced a plethora of inconsistencies, nuances and outright coincidences that do not add up to the official government reports.
Russia didn’t have the power or influence to carry this out. They may have been asked to participate, but only as scapegoats.

Reply
Jan 18, 2022 20:22:45   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
I’m not even going to point out some of your ignorant statements. They’re too obvious to everyone but you.
Milosia2 wrote:
It was not Russia. This is only another smokescreen put out to throw the dogs off the scent.
Russ Baker at WhoWhatWhy is an esteemed investigative journalist who has received numerous awards for his work. He is not done right wing hack with an agenda.
His investigations have produced a plethora of inconsistencies, nuances and outright coincidences that do not add up to the official government reports.
Russia didn’t have the power or influence to carry this out. They may have been asked to participate, but only as scapegoats.
It was not Russia. This is only another smokescree... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 18, 2022 20:25:31   #
Oldsailor65 Loc: Iowa
 
JFlorio wrote:
I’m not even going to point out some of your ignorant statements. They’re too obvious to everyone but you.



Reply
Jan 18, 2022 21:13:39   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
I’m not even going to point out some of your ignorant statements. They’re too obvious to everyone but you.


If you’ve got better info , spit it out !

Reply
Jan 18, 2022 21:34:10   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Milosia2 wrote:
If you’ve got better info , spit it out !


It’s not better info. It’s your lack of reasoning. I personally don’t think Oswald did this on his own. Of course I can’t prove it.

Reply
Jan 18, 2022 21:46:50   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
It’s not better info. It’s your lack of reasoning. I personally don’t think Oswald did this on his own. Of course I can’t prove it.


It has already been proven. 1978 COPA concurred there was more than one shooter.
The evidence is not hard to find. From the bullet hole through JFKs knot in his tie , to the bullet hole through the windshield noted in pics at the emergency entrance at the hospital. The problem was that if there was more than one shooter it would’ve changed the venue to a conspiracy of shooters changing from Federal to be all held in Dallas, Or Texas state.

I haven’t reasoned out anything. You can read right ?
The other shot from the front was covered up with morticians putty that was found at the autopsy in Bethesda. The entry over his right eye explains more about the wound in the back of his head. The claim was this putty cover up was put in on the the flight back to Bethesda. So, a hole in his throat , that was changed to a tracheotomy. And one that shattered his right eyebrow blowing out the back part of his head. Both from the front.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 21:02:54   #
hbmac10
 
Milosia2 wrote:
It has already been proven. 1978 COPA concurred there was more than one shooter.
The evidence is not hard to find. From the bullet hole through JFKs knot in his tie , to the bullet hole through the windshield noted in pics at the emergency entrance at the hospital. The problem was that if there was more than one shooter it would’ve changed the venue to a conspiracy of shooters changing from Federal to be all held in Dallas, Or Texas state.

I haven’t reasoned out anything. You can read right ?
The other shot from the front was covered up with morticians putty that was found at the autopsy in Bethesda. The entry over his right eye explains more about the wound in the back of his head. The claim was this putty cover up was put in on the the flight back to Bethesda. So, a hole in his throat , that was changed to a tracheotomy. And one that shattered his right eyebrow blowing out the back part of his head. Both from the front.
It has already been proven. 1978 COPA concurred th... (show quote)


https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/edward-curtin/jfk-revisited-through-the-looking-glass/

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 21:18:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
I figured the butler did it.
Milosia2 wrote:
It has already been proven. 1978 COPA concurred there was more than one shooter.
The evidence is not hard to find. From the bullet hole through JFKs knot in his tie , to the bullet hole through the windshield noted in pics at the emergency entrance at the hospital. The problem was that if there was more than one shooter it would’ve changed the venue to a conspiracy of shooters changing from Federal to be all held in Dallas, Or Texas state.

I haven’t reasoned out anything. You can read right ?
The other shot from the front was covered up with morticians putty that was found at the autopsy in Bethesda. The entry over his right eye explains more about the wound in the back of his head. The claim was this putty cover up was put in on the the flight back to Bethesda. So, a hole in his throat , that was changed to a tracheotomy. And one that shattered his right eyebrow blowing out the back part of his head. Both from the front.
It has already been proven. 1978 COPA concurred th... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 23:08:54   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JFlorio wrote:
I figured the butler did it.


The butler.
Why did you suddenly clam up your exhaustingly speedy mouth ?

Reply
Jan 20, 2022 00:17:40   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Milosia2 wrote:
The butler.
Why did you suddenly clam up your exhaustingly speedy mouth ?


It was a joke. Figured you wouldn’t get it and talking with you is a waste of time. Go get your GED then come sit at the big table.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.