One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Here is why the hypocritical democrats want to change the filibuster rule:
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
Jan 14, 2022 10:27:37   #
moldyoldy
 
Milosia2 wrote:
V**er ID isn’t a problem.
No one is trying to impersonate v**ers.


Well, people in the village in Florida seem to be splitting themselves in to two people to v**e for trump twice.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 10:46:58   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Milosia2 wrote:
V**er ID isn’t a problem.
No one is trying to impersonate v**ers.


Then why does the left think anyone supporting v**er ID is a r****t??

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 10:47:43   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Well, people in the village in Florida seem to be splitting themselves in to two people to v**e for trump twice.


No where does it say that all four people v**ed for Trump or Biden. Just implies because of demographics. You are misinformed on your misinformation. Perhaps you should be more selective on your misinformation sources so you can present actual verifiable misinformation.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2022 10:54:07   #
moldyoldy
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Then why does the left think anyone supporting v**er ID is a r****t??



Not necessarily r****t but definitely trying to keep control of government out of minority influences.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 10:55:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Not necessarily r****t but definitely trying to keep control of government out of minority influences.


To the woke l*****t democratic socialists, anyone who disagrees with them on any thing at all, is a r****t.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 10:59:04   #
moldyoldy
 
Strycker wrote:
No where does it say that all four people v**ed for Trump or Biden. Just implies because of demographics. You are misinformed on your misinformation. Perhaps you should be more selective on your misinformation sources so you can present actual verifiable misinformation.



They are avowed trumpsters.

State v**er records show Halstead, 71, and Ketcik, 63, are registered Republicans. Rider, 61, has no party affiliation.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 11:01:11   #
moldyoldy
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
To the woke l*****t democratic socialists, anyone who disagrees with them on any thing at all, is a r****t.



You are outing yourself by complaining about the r****t label. Stuck pigs squeal.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2022 11:16:43   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
moldyoldy wrote:
They are avowed trumpsters.

State v**er records show Halstead, 71, and Ketcik, 63, are registered Republicans. Rider, 61, has no party affiliation.


Registered and v**ed are two different things. As far as you know they were all aligned with the Lincoln Project.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 11:38:59   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
You are outing yourself by complaining about the r****t label. Stuck pigs squeal.


If you are implying that I am a r****t, fine, we all are to a degree. It all depends upon how our built in knowledge of different appearances and cultures effects our behaviors and actions. I do know one fact for sure, many ideals of the l*****t woke mind are, in fact, very r****t at their core. When the l*****t r****t tries to flip that on anyone, it is an expression of that deep seated r****m which they would, of course, deny.

Now, who here is the stuck pig??

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 11:58:10   #
moldyoldy
 
Strycker wrote:
Registered and v**ed are two different things. As far as you know they were all aligned with the Lincoln Project.


They were dumb enough to v**e twice, obviously trumpsters.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 12:28:36   #
Ricktloml
 
Strycker wrote:
Totally wrong again. It is a matching funds. The more you raise the more the tax payers give you in matching dollars.


Citizen's United, (my opinion-not very good law,) but it came into being not because of the left's favorite boogimen, the Koch Brothers, but because of Hillary Clinton. People forget it was a low budget anti-Hillary film, exposing a lot of her corruption, (that she tried to have suppressed,) that caused us all to be saddled with this not-too-good law. Funny how the left complains about it, but without Hillary trying to suppress negative information about herself it wouldn't exist.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2022 12:47:12   #
Ricktloml
 
EmilyD wrote:
Mueller took 675 days (from May 17, 2017 to March 22, 2019), interviewed 500 witnesses, issued 2,800 subpoenas and 500 search warrants. His investigation cost upwards of $25 million. He ended the investigation himself with the announcement that he could find no evidence of Russian collusion by Trump or anyone in his administration on that March day.

How on earth can you say he was blocked from doing a complete investigation? How much more time, witnesses, subpoenas, search warrants and money do you think he needed to finish up? No matter how hard he tried and fished and dug, he could not find a single little thing that pointed to Trump being guilty!!!
Mueller took 675 days (from May 17, 2017 to March ... (show quote)



The left is not happy with Mueller. Mueller's lengthy "investigation" (most likely unintentionally,) ended up exposing the Steele dossier as dirty campaign opposition manufactured by Hillary, (ironically using Russian sources.) No wonder he stopped investigating. It was later we found out about the lies to the FISA Court/the outrageous attempt to stop the peaceful t***sfer power to a duly elected President. And the left, (after being caught red-handed in all this corruption/abuse of power,) now wonders why last-minute changes in v****g laws/ways of counting v**es is a concern to a lot of people. Not to the Democrat/C*******ts who benefitted from this nefarious changes/decry audits ect. We are in a serious time now where Democrat/C*******ts want to codify c***ting.

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 13:03:46   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Ricktloml wrote:
The left is not happy with Mueller. Mueller's lengthy "investigation" (most likely unintentionally,) ended up exposing the Steele dossier as dirty campaign opposition manufactured by Hillary, (ironically using Russian sources.) No wonder he stopped investigating. It was later we found out about the lies to the FISA Court/the outrageous attempt to stop the peaceful t***sfer power to a duly elected President. And the left, (after being caught red-handed in all this corruption/abuse of power,) now wonders why last-minute changes in v****g laws/ways of counting v**es is a concern to a lot of people. Not to the Democrat/C*******ts who benefitted from this nefarious changes/decry audits ect. We are in a serious time now where Democrat/C*******ts want to codify c***ting.
The left is not happy with Mueller. Mueller's len... (show quote)


Truly it is a dark time, and they say we, the conservatives, are a threat to democracy! That's rich!!

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 13:19:23   #
American Vet
 
Milosia2 wrote:
The e*******l commission .


And who appoints the 'e*******l commission'?

Reply
Jan 14, 2022 13:34:18   #
moldyoldy
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Citizen's United, (my opinion-not very good law,) but it came into being not because of the left's favorite boogimen, the Koch Brothers, but because of Hillary Clinton. People forget it was a low budget anti-Hillary film, exposing a lot of her corruption, (that she tried to have suppressed,) that caused us all to be saddled with this not-too-good law. Funny how the left complains about it, but without Hillary trying to suppress negative information about herself it wouldn't exist.



Hillary had nothing to do with CU.

https://publicintegrity.org/politics/the-citizens-united-decision-and-why-it-matters/

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 6 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.