drlarrygino wrote:
Very relevant but I guess you don't see the relevancy.
drlarrygino wrote:
The majority is usually wrong and you seem to fit and want majority rule even when wrong. Just look at the W***n toxic jab mess. The majority took the toxic jab and soon to be 4 boosters but now look at the mess they are in. Declining immunity, no positive upside and deaths to the v****d occurring on a massive scale now. Stick with the majority Rascal and be wrong 90% of the time.
RascalRiley wrote:
Trump claims he won the e******n. If he did then he would represent the majority. By your logic, majority wrong, he should not be President.
That is a total contradiction of democracy. That is a recipe for banana republic.
Justice101 wrote:
https://news.yahoo.com/why-the-us-president-isnt-elected-by-national-popular-v**e-105226741.html
RascalRiley wrote:
Ok, the President is elected by the majority of E*******l College v**es.
The crux of this discussion is drlarrygino assertion that the majority is usually wrong.
drlarrygino wrote:
You can win the majority of v**es in a p**********l e******n but still lose the Presidency. Think Rascal, think. Remember, Hitlery supposedly won the total # of v**es (too many i******s and dead people v****g in Californication)but still lost to Trump. The majority of v**ers didn't have it right as our great founders knew the majority is not always right. If the majority of v**es always determined the winner we would indeed have a banana republic but the e*******l college keeps us from having a banana republic which you seem to want to live in.
You can win the majority of v**es in a p**********... (
show quote)
drlarrygino wrote:
The majority had it wrong on the Russian collusion delusion, the W***n jab being safe, that Hitlery was a shoe in as our next President, that George Soreass is a great guy, that joe Bribem is good for our country, that CRT is not a r****t school program and on it goes. Don't follow the majority if you want to be right most of the time.
drlarrygino wrote:
In the House, the majority might have the most v**es but they still can't pass the bill. Destroys your premise again.
RascalRiley wrote:
Irrelevant to the discussion.
drlarrygino wrote:
Very relevant but I guess you don't see the relevancy.
If a bill receives a majority in the House it passes.
Majority rules in the House and the Senate. Bills must receive a majority of v**es in both chambers before they go the President.
If the President signs the bill that that had previously received a majority of v**es in both chambers then it becomes law.
If the President vetos the bill it goes back to Congress and requires a super majority to override that veto.
“In the House, the majority might have the most v**es but they still can't pass the bill”. This statements incorrect. The House can not enact laws but it must pass said bills by a majority before they can become laws.