trashbaum

Samething as agreeing with the devil.

Owl32 Loc: ARK

States must assure that e******ns are not false and do reflect the majority of legal v**ers. No illegal, dead souls and b****t harvesting none of this crap in legal period. Demonrats and Rhino's are c***ters and liars.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

The next e******ns could be decided after the the e******n in some Republican States.

Those who cast the v**es decide nothing. Those who decide what v**es to count decide everything.

https://www.rawstory.com/gerrymandering-2656412148/

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

So far the totality of the new district maps favor Democrats. Changes from the old maps = +7 Democratic-leaning seats, +1 Republican-leaning seat, -6 highly competitive seats. So, who is it that is gerrymandering? I'll give you a hint... It starts with a "D".

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-2022-maps/

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

If you want to see how it's done look Illinory Democrat gerrymandering been doing it for decades

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

You are right. The fact that this is news indicates how unusual this is.

But the next e******ns may be decided after the v**e, not by the v**e.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Overall, redistricting hasn’t drastically changed the House landscape so far — but that’s good news for Republicans, since the old maps already tilted the House playing field in their favor. However, that could change if some of the maps most favorable to Republicans get overturned in court.

It’s called levelling the playing field

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Much like the last e******n and too many e******ns before. H*****g chads and b****ts discovered in the trunks of cars comes to mind.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

JoyV

The only way to decide after the v**e is if even more massive fraud is found than was found in the 2020 e******n, seeing that though there were tens of thousands more invalid v**es discovered in one county my state alone than the amount the "winning" candidate won by.

Here is a breakdown of those 49,718 questionable v**es:

23,344 mail-in b****ts were counted from individuals who no longer lived at the address to which the mail-in b****t was sent. The audit called these “mail-in b****ts v**ed from prior address” in the v**er history phase. (critical impact)
*9,041 more b****ts returned by v**ers than received in the v**er history phase.
*5,295 v**ers that potentially v**ed in multiple counties in the certified results phase.
*3,432 more b****ts cast than the list of people who show as having cast a v**e. The audit called this group of b****ts “official results does not match who v**ed,” in the certified results phase.
*2,592 more duplicates than original b****ts in the b****t phase.
*2,382 in person v**ers who had moved out of Maricopa County in the certified results phase.
*2,081 v**ers moved out of state during 29 day preceding e******n in the v**er history phase.
*1,551 v**es counted in excess of v**ers who v**ed in the certified results phase.

The claim often made that the audit was partisan because one specific Democrat observer was forbidden reentrance after he tried to disrupt the process is ridiculous. Many people were allowed in to observe. The process included:
1. All b****t boxes sent by the e******n officials were put in a locked cage in an open area of the convention center floor which had multiple cameras on it at all times.
2. Each table had equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats examining the b****ts.
3. For each b****t box two people assigned to move b****t boxes, one a Republican and one a Democrat, were sent to the cage to sign out a box. Each had to sign. They both accompanied the box to the table. At the table one Republican and one Democrat must sign they received the box. When done with the box, the reverse was done.
4. Each table had two cameras recording all the time.
5. The entire floor of the convention center was under several cameras all the time.
6. Observers, including press and officials and legislators from other states, could watch from the stands.



https://www.ntd.com/live-arizona-senate-holds-hearing-on-e******n-audit-in-maricopa-county_643559.html

And for anyone who can't access videos, here is a full transcript.
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/arizona-state-senate-hearing-on-the-2020-e******n-audit-in-maricopa-county-july-15

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

After the v**es are counted and if democrats win a district Republican Legislators might decide there was fraud and the Republican should have won. After all they are representatives of the people.

JoyV

And evidence of fraud would need to be presented, and then the state legislature would have to v**e on decertifying the e******n. Despite plenty of evidence in multiple states for the 2020 e******n, no state legislatures have v**ed for decertification yet. No one can simply say we think there was fraud so we are going to reverse the results. This is being raised as a bogeyman to validate removing e******n integrity measures, both recent security measures and and long term security measures. Measures such as having secure drop boxes with cameras. Needing picture IDs. Taking the deceased and those who no longer live in the district off the v**er rolls.