The right has it fixed in their brains that states that want to make it harder to v**e are all about e******n integrity
They still blather on about how dems oppose ID's...which has not been an issue for a long time. Now it's about the stupidity of intentionally making lines in big cities hours longer than they should be, shortening days, shortening v****g hours, limiting drop boxes, eliminating as much v****g by mail as possible...
And my personal favorite, challenging the signature match on the ID...a person has a valid ID, their face matches the picture on the ID, they are properly enrolled on the v**er rolls...yet some ignorant fool says nope, your signature doesn't match...whereupon they have to use a provisional b****t...which would not be that big a thing except that in some red districts those provisional b****ts will never be counted because "there was a problem with them".
Republicans know that the only way they can win is by limiting the number of Democrats v**es.
And they do not have the right to ask for ID to make sure your old enough to buy alcohol or tobacco either that's r****t and stops people from getting their products.
keepuphope wrote:
And they do not have the right to ask for ID to make sure your old enough to buy alcohol or tobacco either that's r****t and stops people from getting their products.
Democrats think they have a right to make their c***ting easier.
woodguru wrote:
The right has it fixed in their brains that states that want to make it harder to v**e are all about e******n integrity
They still blather on about how dems oppose ID's...which has not been an issue for a long time. Now it's about the stupidity of intentionally making lines in big cities hours longer than they should be, shortening days, shortening v****g hours, limiting drop boxes, eliminating as much v****g by mail as possible...
And my personal favorite, challenging the signature match on the ID...a person has a valid ID, their face matches the picture on the ID, they are properly enrolled on the v**er rolls...yet some ignorant fool says nope, your signature doesn't match...whereupon they have to use a provisional b****t...which would not be that big a thing except that in some red districts those provisional b****ts will never be counted because "there was a problem with them".
The right has it fixed in their brains that states... (
show quote)
States actually have the Constitutional right to make their own v****g laws. That's why HR1 is unconstitutional.
woodguru wrote:
The right has it fixed in their brains that states that want to make it harder to v**e are all about e******n integrity
They still blather on about how dems oppose ID's...which has not been an issue for a long time. Now it's about the stupidity of intentionally making lines in big cities hours longer than they should be, shortening days, shortening v****g hours, limiting drop boxes, eliminating as much v****g by mail as possible...
And my personal favorite, challenging the signature match on the ID...a person has a valid ID, their face matches the picture on the ID, they are properly enrolled on the v**er rolls...yet some ignorant fool says nope, your signature doesn't match...whereupon they have to use a provisional b****t...which would not be that big a thing except that in some red districts those provisional b****ts will never be counted because "there was a problem with them".
The right has it fixed in their brains that states... (
show quote)
***States Do Not Have A Right To Make V****g Harder
>>>Governments Do Not Have A Right To Make C***ting Easier
LogicallyRight wrote:
***States Do Not Have A Right To Make V****g Harder
>>>Governments Do Not Have A Right To Make C***ting Easier
What is necessary is trust in the v****g system. Plus, all reasonable methods to ensure one v**e-one person. We had no trust in the 2020 e******n, and there were a number of methods available to c***t the system. We want everyone that is registered to v**e to v**e, and they should v**e at a polling station, not by mail, and not by stuffing a box with b****ts. Further, there should be no intimidation of v**ers outside the poll, such as happened in 2020. I cannot understand why Dems want to open up the ways to v**e, except to make rigging the e******n easier. I also cannot understand why people v**ed for a demented man. I lived with a demented person for 9 years and I know just how fuddled and emotional they get, simply not able to perform the simplest of tasks such as turning on the TV, or setting up the microwave, or driving the car. They cannot make the simplest of decisions, yet you Dems put him in the Oval Office! Total madness!
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
woodguru wrote:
The right has it fixed in their brains that states that want to make it harder to v**e are all about e******n integrity
They still blather on about how dems oppose ID's...which has not been an issue for a long time. Now it's about the stupidity of intentionally making lines in big cities hours longer than they should be, shortening days, shortening v****g hours, limiting drop boxes, eliminating as much v****g by mail as possible...
And my personal favorite, challenging the signature match on the ID...a person has a valid ID, their face matches the picture on the ID, they are properly enrolled on the v**er rolls...yet some ignorant fool says nope, your signature doesn't match...whereupon they have to use a provisional b****t...which would not be that big a thing except that in some red districts those provisional b****ts will never be counted because "there was a problem with them".
The right has it fixed in their brains that states... (
show quote)
No state is making v****g harder than it was pre p******c. Most are making it easier to v**e by legally codifying what changes did work during the temporary emergency rules in 2020. Not sure why you have a need to continuously misrepresent the actual t***h. You might want to talk to a specialist about that.
manning5 wrote:
What is necessary is trust in the v****g system. Plus, all reasonable methods to ensure one v**e-one person. We had no trust in the 2020 e******n, and there were a number of methods available to c***t the system. We want everyone that is registered to v**e to v**e, and they should v**e at a polling station, not by mail, and not by stuffing a box with b****ts. Further, there should be no intimidation of v**ers outside the poll, such as happened in 2020. I cannot understand why Dems want to open up the ways to v**e, except to make rigging the e******n easier. I also cannot understand why people v**ed for a demented man. I lived with a demented person for 9 years and I know just how fuddled and emotional they get, simply not able to perform the simplest of tasks such as turning on the TV, or setting up the microwave, or driving the car. They cannot make the simplest of decisions, yet you Dems put him in the Oval Office! Total madness!
What is necessary is trust in the v****g system. P... (
show quote)
States have a constitutional duty to make v****g LEGAL
woodguru wrote:
The right has it fixed in their brains that states that want to make it harder to v**e are all about e******n integrity
They still blather on about how dems oppose ID's...which has not been an issue for a long time. Now it's about the stupidity of intentionally making lines in big cities hours longer than they should be, shortening days, shortening v****g hours, limiting drop boxes, eliminating as much v****g by mail as possible...
And my personal favorite, challenging the signature match on the ID...a person has a valid ID, their face matches the picture on the ID, they are properly enrolled on the v**er rolls...yet some ignorant fool says nope, your signature doesn't match...whereupon they have to use a provisional b****t...which would not be that big a thing except that in some red districts those provisional b****ts will never be counted because "there was a problem with them".
The right has it fixed in their brains that states... (
show quote)
We need to make every legal v**e count which means you can subtract at least 50% of the v**es cast for any Demorat candidate to get the real v**e tally. In fact I'm all for a mandate that would call for a reduction of 50% of the v**es for any Demorat in any e******n.
woodguru wrote:
The right has it fixed in their brains that states that want to make it harder to v**e are all about e******n integrity
They still blather on about how dems oppose ID's...which has not been an issue for a long time. Now it's about the stupidity of intentionally making lines in big cities hours longer than they should be, shortening days, shortening v****g hours, limiting drop boxes, eliminating as much v****g by mail as possible...
And my personal favorite, challenging the signature match on the ID...a person has a valid ID, their face matches the picture on the ID, they are properly enrolled on the v**er rolls...yet some ignorant fool says nope, your signature doesn't match...whereupon they have to use a provisional b****t...which would not be that big a thing except that in some red districts those provisional b****ts will never be counted because "there was a problem with them".
The right has it fixed in their brains that states... (
show quote)
What states do you speak of? Don't forget Deleware.
SGM B
Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now
WEBCO wrote:
States actually have the Constitutional right to make their own v****g laws. That's why HR1 is unconstitutional.
Holy Crap!!! Don’t point out Constitutional law to this bunch of OPP leftest - their heads might explode.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.