A*****xxers are the deadliest variant of C****-**: And that is the simple and sad t***h. Anti-vax influencers tout anecdotes of adverse reactions without mentioning how rare they are.

rumitoid

And that is the simple and sad t***h.

Anti-vax influencers tout anecdotes of adverse reactions without mentioning how rare they are. These anecdotes are a form of phobia indoctrination. Anti-v**xers withhold information about the v*****es, causing people to fear that by getting v******ted, they would be putting themselves at a high risk of severe side effects. The reality is that instances of serious negative physical reactions to the v*****e are very rare.

It's important for people to think critically about the actual risks of C***d vs. the risk of the C***d v*****e, and not just succumb to irrational fear. Unv******ted people are at a much higher risk of dying from the v***s, and doctors overwhelmingly agree that getting v******ted is by far the safest, best choice.

Rather than trusting anti-vax influencers, people with concerns about the safety of the v*****e should be looking at the facts and trusting the experts.

Distorting information
Anti-vax groups distort information by misinterpreting data and casting doubt on the scientific process. For instance, many anti-vax influencers claim that the v*****e is dangerous because it is new and was rapidly developed. But in reality, C****-** v*****es make use of technology that has been extensively studied for decades, and the v*****e had to go through usual rigorous testing for emergency approval.

Anti-vax campaigns to distort information remind me of the way fears were implanted in me when I was a Moonie. I was programmed to h**e democracy and believe that it was Satanic. After deprogramming, I realized that the Moonies had used corrupt brainwashing tactics on me to support their anti-democratic political agenda.

Outright lying
Anti-v******tion social media campaigns spew outright lies to sow doubt and confusion about the v******tion process.

Last year, an anti-vax propaganda film went v***l. The film falsely claimed that the C***d v*****e is a money-making scheme for a group of elites, who are hiding evidence that the v*****e causes medical harm. It likely successfully implanted v*****e phobias for many who watched it.

When people are not properly informed, deciding whether or not to get v******ted can be a scary decision. People are constantly exposed to lies about the v*****es online, including false claims that they alter DNA or lead to infertility.

Of course, we know that billions of doses have been administered worldwide. That is a huge sample size, and the absence of any widespread serious side effects speaks to the v*****e's safety.
Phobias are common, but curable. If we do not take the time to analyze the data and actual risk, and if we allow ourselves to trust people and sources that are untrustworthy, we can go down a rabbit hole of paranoia and end up in real danger. Helping people overcome these fears is the only way to end this p******c.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/29/perspectives/c****-**-v*****e-anti-v**xers-social-media-cults/index.html

Liberty Tree

rumitoid wrote:

And that is the simple and sad t***h.

Anti-vax influencers tout anecdotes of adverse reactions without mentioning how rare they are. These anecdotes are a form of phobia indoctrination. Anti-v**xers withhold information about the v*****es, causing people to fear that by getting v******ted, they would be putting themselves at a high risk of severe side effects. The reality is that instances of serious negative physical reactions to the v*****e are very rare.

It's important for people to think critically about the actual risks of C***d vs. the risk of the C***d v*****e, and not just succumb to irrational fear. Unv******ted people are at a much higher risk of dying from the v***s, and doctors overwhelmingly agree that getting v******ted is by far the safest, best choice.

Rather than trusting anti-vax influencers, people with concerns about the safety of the v*****e should be looking at the facts and trusting the experts.

Distorting information
Anti-vax groups distort information by misinterpreting data and casting doubt on the scientific process. For instance, many anti-vax influencers claim that the v*****e is dangerous because it is new and was rapidly developed. But in reality, C****-** v*****es make use of technology that has been extensively studied for decades, and the v*****e had to go through usual rigorous testing for emergency approval.

Anti-vax campaigns to distort information remind me of the way fears were implanted in me when I was a Moonie. I was programmed to h**e democracy and believe that it was Satanic. After deprogramming, I realized that the Moonies had used corrupt brainwashing tactics on me to support their anti-democratic political agenda.

Outright lying
Anti-v******tion social media campaigns spew outright lies to sow doubt and confusion about the v******tion process.

Last year, an anti-vax propaganda film went v***l. The film falsely claimed that the C***d v*****e is a money-making scheme for a group of elites, who are hiding evidence that the v*****e causes medical harm. It likely successfully implanted v*****e phobias for many who watched it.

When people are not properly informed, deciding whether or not to get v******ted can be a scary decision. People are constantly exposed to lies about the v*****es online, including false claims that they alter DNA or lead to infertility.

Of course, we know that billions of doses have been administered worldwide. That is a huge sample size, and the absence of any widespread serious side effects speaks to the v*****e's safety.
Phobias are common, but curable. If we do not take the time to analyze the data and actual risk, and if we allow ourselves to trust people and sources that are untrustworthy, we can go down a rabbit hole of paranoia and end up in real danger. Helping people overcome these fears is the only way to end this p******c.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/29/perspectives/c****-**-v*****e-anti-v**xers-social-media-cults/index.html

And that is the simple and sad t***h. br br Anti-... (show quote)

An ELWNJ opinion piece from CNN is a long way from fact.

pegw

There have been 880,000 deaths from C***d. Even if you use the raw numbers from VARES, there was about 100,000 ill effects fron the v*****e. So you have eight times the protection with a shot.

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

pegw wrote:

There have been 880,000 deaths from C***d. Even if you use the raw numbers from VARES, there was about 100,000 ill effects fron the v*****e. So you have eight times the protection with a shot.

I suggest you take a course on statistical analysis and update your post.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

pegw wrote:

There have been 880,000 deaths from C***d. Even if you use the raw numbers from VARES, there was about 100,000 ill effects fron the v*****e. So you have eight times the protection with a shot.

Still not enough time has passed to know of any longterm health affects. Protection from the v***s doesn't look so good if the v*****e paralyses or gives you a heart problem or any other number of side affects.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

JR-57 wrote:

I suggest you take a course on statistical analysis and update your post.

Good luck with that!

Liberty Tree

pegw wrote:

There have been 880,000 deaths from C***d. Even if you use the raw numbers from VARES, there was about 100,000 ill effects fron the v*****e. So you have eight times the protection with a shot.

Still believe every lie you are told. People like you make tyranny possible

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Liberty Tree wrote:

Still believe every lie you are told. People like you make tyranny possible

Amazes me. Most progressives believe they are so much smarter than everyone else. Yet, they follow their leaders like brainless lemmings.

Liberty Tree

JFlorio wrote:

Amazes me. Most progressives believe they are so much smarter than everyone else. Yet, they follow their leaders like brainless lemmings.

That is t***h!

AmericanEagle Loc: Indiana

rumitoid wrote:

And that is the simple and sad t***h.

Anti-vax influencers tout anecdotes of adverse reactions without mentioning how rare they are. These anecdotes are a form of phobia indoctrination. Anti-v**xers withhold information about the v*****es, causing people to fear that by getting v******ted, they would be putting themselves at a high risk of severe side effects. The reality is that instances of serious negative physical reactions to the v*****e are very rare.

It's important for people to think critically about the actual risks of C***d vs. the risk of the C***d v*****e, and not just succumb to irrational fear. Unv******ted people are at a much higher risk of dying from the v***s, and doctors overwhelmingly agree that getting v******ted is by far the safest, best choice.

Rather than trusting anti-vax influencers, people with concerns about the safety of the v*****e should be looking at the facts and trusting the experts.

Distorting information
Anti-vax groups distort information by misinterpreting data and casting doubt on the scientific process. For instance, many anti-vax influencers claim that the v*****e is dangerous because it is new and was rapidly developed. But in reality, C****-** v*****es make use of technology that has been extensively studied for decades, and the v*****e had to go through usual rigorous testing for emergency approval.

Anti-vax campaigns to distort information remind me of the way fears were implanted in me when I was a Moonie. I was programmed to h**e democracy and believe that it was Satanic. After deprogramming, I realized that the Moonies had used corrupt brainwashing tactics on me to support their anti-democratic political agenda.

Outright lying
Anti-v******tion social media campaigns spew outright lies to sow doubt and confusion about the v******tion process.

Last year, an anti-vax propaganda film went v***l. The film falsely claimed that the C***d v*****e is a money-making scheme for a group of elites, who are hiding evidence that the v*****e causes medical harm. It likely successfully implanted v*****e phobias for many who watched it.

When people are not properly informed, deciding whether or not to get v******ted can be a scary decision. People are constantly exposed to lies about the v*****es online, including false claims that they alter DNA or lead to infertility.

Of course, we know that billions of doses have been administered worldwide. That is a huge sample size, and the absence of any widespread serious side effects speaks to the v*****e's safety.
Phobias are common, but curable. If we do not take the time to analyze the data and actual risk, and if we allow ourselves to trust people and sources that are untrustworthy, we can go down a rabbit hole of paranoia and end up in real danger. Helping people overcome these fears is the only way to end this p******c.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/29/perspectives/c****-**-v*****e-anti-v**xers-social-media-cults/index.html

And that is the simple and sad t***h. br br Anti-... (show quote)

First of all are you touting the C****e news network is the first major red f**g.
Your article is filled with propaganda and lies. I suggest you look at this link below which has the backing of the American heart Association and I consider that pretty sound. Might also look at the real numbers like the five red states that have the lowest C***d rates, children go to school without masks and five worst states are blue I have the most regulations, in the most mandates. To me there is your science proof we can live our lives without being mandated and forced v******tions. New data also suggest That’s a v******ted or deadlier than unv******ted because they are the carriers. Also thanks for the v******tion we now have a variants. So just don’t spew propaganda and get the actual facts.

https://headlineusa.com/vax-link-greater-risk-heart-attack/

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

rumitoid wrote:

And that is the simple and sad t***h.

Anti-vax influencers tout anecdotes of adverse reactions without mentioning how rare they are. These anecdotes are a form of phobia indoctrination. Anti-v**xers withhold information about the v*****es, causing people to fear that by getting v******ted, they would be putting themselves at a high risk of severe side effects. The reality is that instances of serious negative physical reactions to the v*****e are very rare.

It's important for people to think critically about the actual risks of C***d vs. the risk of the C***d v*****e, and not just succumb to irrational fear. Unv******ted people are at a much higher risk of dying from the v***s, and doctors overwhelmingly agree that getting v******ted is by far the safest, best choice.

Rather than trusting anti-vax influencers, people with concerns about the safety of the v*****e should be looking at the facts and trusting the experts.

Distorting information
Anti-vax groups distort information by misinterpreting data and casting doubt on the scientific process. For instance, many anti-vax influencers claim that the v*****e is dangerous because it is new and was rapidly developed. But in reality, C****-** v*****es make use of technology that has been extensively studied for decades, and the v*****e had to go through usual rigorous testing for emergency approval.

Anti-vax campaigns to distort information remind me of the way fears were implanted in me when I was a Moonie. I was programmed to h**e democracy and believe that it was Satanic. After deprogramming, I realized that the Moonies had used corrupt brainwashing tactics on me to support their anti-democratic political agenda.

Outright lying
Anti-v******tion social media campaigns spew outright lies to sow doubt and confusion about the v******tion process.

Last year, an anti-vax propaganda film went v***l. The film falsely claimed that the C***d v*****e is a money-making scheme for a group of elites, who are hiding evidence that the v*****e causes medical harm. It likely successfully implanted v*****e phobias for many who watched it.

When people are not properly informed, deciding whether or not to get v******ted can be a scary decision. People are constantly exposed to lies about the v*****es online, including false claims that they alter DNA or lead to infertility.

Of course, we know that billions of doses have been administered worldwide. That is a huge sample size, and the absence of any widespread serious side effects speaks to the v*****e's safety.
Phobias are common, but curable. If we do not take the time to analyze the data and actual risk, and if we allow ourselves to trust people and sources that are untrustworthy, we can go down a rabbit hole of paranoia and end up in real danger. Helping people overcome these fears is the only way to end this p******c.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/29/perspectives/c****-**-v*****e-anti-v**xers-social-media-cults/index.html

And that is the simple and sad t***h. br br Anti-... (show quote)

***A*****xxers are the deadliest variant of C****-**

>>>Those that would mandate a failing, deadly, experimental v*****e are the deadliest variant of C****-**

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

JFlorio wrote:

Amazes me. Most progressives believe they are so much smarter than everyone else. Yet, they follow their leaders like brainless lemmings.

And those leaders are even worse.

currahee506

rumitoid wrote:

And that is the simple and sad t***h.

Anti-vax influencers tout anecdotes of adverse reactions without mentioning how rare they are. These anecdotes are a form of phobia indoctrination. Anti-v**xers withhold information about the v*****es, causing people to fear that by getting v******ted, they would be putting themselves at a high risk of severe side effects. The reality is that instances of serious negative physical reactions to the v*****e are very rare.

It's important for people to think critically about the actual risks of C***d vs. the risk of the C***d v*****e, and not just succumb to irrational fear. Unv******ted people are at a much higher risk of dying from the v***s, and doctors overwhelmingly agree that getting v******ted is by far the safest, best choice.

Rather than trusting anti-vax influencers, people with concerns about the safety of the v*****e should be looking at the facts and trusting the experts.

Distorting information
Anti-vax groups distort information by misinterpreting data and casting doubt on the scientific process. For instance, many anti-vax influencers claim that the v*****e is dangerous because it is new and was rapidly developed. But in reality, C****-** v*****es make use of technology that has been extensively studied for decades, and the v*****e had to go through usual rigorous testing for emergency approval.

Anti-vax campaigns to distort information remind me of the way fears were implanted in me when I was a Moonie. I was programmed to h**e democracy and believe that it was Satanic. After deprogramming, I realized that the Moonies had used corrupt brainwashing tactics on me to support their anti-democratic political agenda.

Outright lying
Anti-v******tion social media campaigns spew outright lies to sow doubt and confusion about the v******tion process.

Last year, an anti-vax propaganda film went v***l. The film falsely claimed that the C***d v*****e is a money-making scheme for a group of elites, who are hiding evidence that the v*****e causes medical harm. It likely successfully implanted v*****e phobias for many who watched it.

When people are not properly informed, deciding whether or not to get v******ted can be a scary decision. People are constantly exposed to lies about the v*****es online, including false claims that they alter DNA or lead to infertility.

Of course, we know that billions of doses have been administered worldwide. That is a huge sample size, and the absence of any widespread serious side effects speaks to the v*****e's safety.
Phobias are common, but curable. If we do not take the time to analyze the data and actual risk, and if we allow ourselves to trust people and sources that are untrustworthy, we can go down a rabbit hole of paranoia and end up in real danger. Helping people overcome these fears is the only way to end this p******c.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/29/perspectives/c****-**-v*****e-anti-v**xers-social-media-cults/index.html

And that is the simple and sad t***h. br br Anti-... (show quote)

You seem to need a lot of justification to make your point, But "your point" simply misses the point of it all because you don't seem to see that once untested science becomes militantly mandated then it is no longer science but dictatorship. Also, it brings a suspicious atmosphere upon the intelligent populace because when the ones pushing for v******tion do not accept liability for their product the intelligent wonder, "what is going on?" Then when the info on the adverse effects of the product is in, it makes even more suspect. Then when you see that the ones pushing it are criminals (they just haven't been arrested, yet), then it is just a matter of time before the whole populace sees how they have been s**mmed.

rumitoid

Liberty Tree wrote:

An ELWNJ opinion piece from CNN is a long way from fact.

Show me where and how or your comments are worthless.

rumitoid

pegw wrote:

There have been 880,000 deaths from C***d. Even if you use the raw numbers from VARES, there was about 100,000 ill effects fron the v*****e. So you have eight times the protection with a shot.

Nice.