OPP Poll..........A******n Law...
Do you think Roe V Wade will be overturned? It's been a law for almost 50yrs....I doubt it will be overturned......What say you?
proud republican wrote:
Do you think Roe V Wade will be overturned? It's been a law for almost 50yrs....I doubt it will be overturned......What say you?
No chance, liberal judges are blinded by ideology and conservative judges are too intimidated.
It works wth this SCOTUS, especially with Roberts.
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
I doubt it will be, but, If Roe is overturned it will be the end of republicans. A large majority support limits on a******n but few support very strict limits beyond what Roe already imposes.
proud republican wrote:
Do you think Roe V Wade will be overturned? It's been a law for almost 50yrs....I doubt it will be overturned......What say you?
It is not an a******n law. It is a Women’s rights law.
Does she or does she not have a right to take care of Her Body the way she’s sees fit.? Or does the government need to protect her rights by allowing safe
Safe medical terminations.
As opposed to the unsafe terminations that started Roe v wade.
The Hyde amendment is still intact. Government will never be allowed to pay for terminations. Planned Parenthood has never been the enemy. They provide valuable medical services for women, and men.
Liberty Tree wrote:
It works wth this SCOTUS, especially with Roberts.
It’s Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett . The three who were promised supreme seats
For life. All three were involved in stopping the v**e counting in Florida 2000 e******n. Let me guess, another. 5-4 decision.
Milosia2 wrote:
It is not an a******n law. It is a Women’s rights law.
Does she or does she not have a right to take care of Her Body the way she’s sees fit.? Or does the government need to protect her rights by allowing safe
Safe medical terminations.
As opposed to the unsafe terminations that started Roe v wade.
The Hyde amendment is still intact. Government will never be allowed to pay for terminations. Planned Parenthood has never been the enemy. They provide valuable medical services for women, and men.
It is not an a******n law. It is a Women’s rights ... (
show quote)
Murder is murder. Period.
Milosia2 wrote:
It is not an a******n law. It is a Women’s rights law.
Does she or does she not have a right to take care of Her Body the way she’s sees fit.? Or does the government need to protect her rights by allowing safe
Safe medical terminations.
As opposed to the unsafe terminations that started Roe v wade.
The Hyde amendment is still intact. Government will never be allowed to pay for terminations. Planned Parenthood has never been the enemy. They provide valuable medical services for women, and men.
It is not an a******n law. It is a Women’s rights ... (
show quote)
Fraudulent billing practices. Dead babies. Harmful sex education. And more. Planned Parenthood should not receive our tax dollars. Americans should not pay for a******ns.
Our tax money is better spent on programs that help people, not harm them.
https://www.hli.org/resources/who-pays-for-a******ns-at-planned-parenthood/Democrats are baby k**lers:
https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/29/house-democrats-pass-bill-to-pay-for-a******ns-overseas-using-american-tax-dollars/
Nature tries to start a new human every time a woman ovulates. If we really considered human life sacred we should insure that ovum has every chance to live. We should outlaw sexual abstinence as negligent homicide.
Obviously I don't believe in that. I think the law should be to protect society, not the unborn infant. It does not hurt anyone else if a woman has an a******n, so it should be none of their business. Saying that conception is when the ovum becomes a person is really a religious concept. The constitution prohibits an establishment of religion, I feel that any anti-a******n law is therefore a violation of the constitution.
BigJim wrote:
Nature tries to start a new human every time a woman ovulates. If we really considered human life sacred we should insure that ovum has every chance to live. We should outlaw sexual abstinence as negligent homicide.
Obviously I don't believe in that. I think the law should be to protect society, not the unborn infant. It does not hurt anyone else if a woman has an a******n, so it should be none of their business. Saying that conception is when the ovum becomes a person is really a religious concept. The constitution prohibits an establishment of religion, I feel that any anti-a******n law is therefore a violation of the constitution.
Nature tries to start a new human every time a wom... (
show quote)
"feelings" are responsible for untold millions of deaths. Hitler would be jealous.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.