This entire exchange has nothing to do with the thread. I responded to Robby 1. I had no intention of engaging you, I simply replied to Robby 1. I gave my point of view to him, and expected him to respond if they had more to add.
He sees all humans as dead. I wanted to give him another view. I did want to give you a different view or food for thought, only the person that saw humans as dead. You invited yourself into the conversation. I responded to you. Yes, I should have known better, but I made the mistake of responding to your statements.
If you wish to think that I was insulting, then fine. Think it. But, remember just because you think something is true, does not make it true. And remember, you entered into the conversation......
Now for your questions or points or wh**ever you are calling them:
You quoted me as follows: " We do not need to continue in our past wickedness,
but we have he tyranny emerging out of so-called progressive programs pushed by the LeftWhat I wrote was: We do not need to continue in our past wickedness,
but we have the ability to make better choices.Look at them, they are back to back. So, yes you changed my words.
We are given free will by God, therefore we can choose to act wrongly, say harsh things, steal, c***t, use Gods name when swearing, and the list goes on. We can choose to do right.
I responded to your comment, But a Christian does not have "the ability to make better choices." That is the central difference between OT and NT
I clearly said that Atonement for all is prayer. Are you saying that prayer is only an OT thing?
Sacrifice is mentioned as atonement in the OT, I simply wanted you to know that this has not been available after the fall of the Temple. It was replaced with prayer.
Are you now done with this? It is silly, immature, a waste of time and energy and I am done with it.
Good night
rumitoid wrote:
Making by innuendo that my post is somehow "provoking you" to respond unkindly is both absurd and a cached attack on me. This is a priceless insult and so well done: "I do not want to cause you to fail in your promise to remain thoughtful of your comments." My comments were thoughtful, succinct and enumerated:
'1) I did not change your quote.
2) "Then why can you not ask to be forgiven, and believe that you are and then go about making better choices": one has nothing to do with the other.
3) "Are you saying that prayer is only an OT thing?" how did you get that wild notion?
4) "You see the OT, rules of making offerings as as atonement. You are missing the point that when the 3d Temple fell, there is no more offerings."
Never was part of my point or even tangentially part of my point.'
Making by innuendo that my post is somehow "p... (
show quote)