Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

This, in all likelihood, is the reason for the extermination of white people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdWpMPswtf8

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

How pitiful is this? Here's another look at this White Separatist for anyone who can endure it.

https://hatetrackers.blogspot.com/2019/11/tulsa-christian-identity-church-tied-to.html

"It looks like any of a hundred aging churches in Oklahoma, but this one keeps to itself and requires an invitation to enter. The first requirement to gaining access is you have to be white. Non-whites are forbidden to cross the threshold.

Their mission statement is known as Anglo-Celtic and is what the Rose Hill Community Church avers. It claims that white Europeans are the true Israelites and the Jews of today are descended from Ham, as they believe all non-whites to be. It is the basis for separating the races and teaches that anyone who isn't white is inferior and ungodly. It's found within the Christian Identity churches and is part of the Statement of Faith and Purpose found on the ministry website run by Charles Jennings.

This house of worship wants not to be noticed, as each week Ku Klux Klan members, race separatists, and Southern secessionists, gather to be indoctrinated further into white identity ideology."

According to multiple online reports, Pastor Charles Jennings, who narrates the recommended tape is an Anti-Semite, an Anti-Black, White Separatist/White Supremacist who believes only those of the white race are the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and that they alone are God's people.

Rose Hill Church is located at 1245 N Canton Ave, Tulsa, OK. The head pastor for Rose Hill, who appears on the tape that is recommended, above is a truly "gone by the wayside" neo-Confederate named Charles Jennings.
Northeast Tulsa's Rose Hill Community Church, formerly known as the Rose Hill Covenant Church, is an independent Pentecostal church operating with the added Christian Identity belief that whites are the superior race and the Bible says non-whites must serve them.

That is their on-record interpretation anyway.

Their Church members pound the Bible saying it is clear that God has given the true Israelites - white European men descended from Japheth, the son of Noah - permission to dominate inferior races. Those taught as inferior would be the descendants of Canaan, son of Ham and grandson of Noah. Africans.

The congregants at Rose Hill have a long list of people to hate, beginning with Jews, Catholics, and all non-whites.
As an extension of that, Jennings has no problem with feeding his listeners heresy, by fabricating non-existent Bible stories.

Rose Hill gets its belief in white separatism by basing their foundation on the teachings of head pastor Charles A. Jennings, who rationalizes African American slavery with what he calls The Curse of Ham, to which he adds a new twist.

With absolutely no authority from the Bible, Charles Jennings made up what he thinks was the sin of Ham.

At some point, he apparently sat there wondering what could've gone on, and his imagination came up with "Well, if Noah was drunk, his wife would have been in the tent drunk too, so that means Ham came in, stared at his naked Father, and then raped his intoxicated Mother. - Ipso facto, rape and incest was the true sin."

The Bible says in Genesis 9:22 "And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without."

In between the three words: "his father, and," Pastor Jennings has managed to slip in "mother being in the tent drunk and Ham taking advantage of her." words that are simply not there, anywhere in Scripture regarding Noah.

There is absolutely no Biblical mention of the things Jennings claims in the segment, which is part of a larger system he teaches that justifies the enslavement, abuse, and dehumanization of non-whites.

Christian Identity goes hand-in-hand with heresy and false teachings. At its core, the theology is about warping the meaning and plain truth of the Bible into a place where God's plan was to make white people superior and non-whites inferior.

"Christian Identity is a unique anti-Semitic and racist theology achieving some prominence in the 1980s among those who are "Christians in name only," and they are hostile toward evangelicals and fundamentalists who believe in the Bible prophecies that teach the return of Jews to Israel as being essential to the fulfillment of end-time prophecy."

Jennings believes that being the color black isn't due to the Curse of Ham... although he teaches the Africans are descendants of Ham's supposed rape and incest attack against his own mother... He doesn't explain how skin color would even come into the mix.

On other videos found on Jennings' YouTube channel, he and others preach at Rose Hill about the need to separate the races and how slavery is justifiable.

They, also, believe only whites are the true Israelites, - that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic, Scandinavian and related peoples are the only people that fulfill all the prophetic earmarks that identify them with being the literal physical descendants of the ancient people of Old Testament history known as Israelites (Genesis Chapters 48 & 49; Deuteronomy 7:6-8).

The Ku Klux Klan traditionally has maintained a similar belief system and are closely tied to "Christian Identity" churches. Rose Hill Community Church is one of those churches.

Besides running Rose Hill Community Church, Pastor Jennings also operates a publishing company called "Truth in History," (which is the last thing he should be claiming).

That company is the evangelistic outreach of the non-profit Jennings runs from his own home, a neo-Confederate organization called Kingdom Treasures Ministries.

"Those blacks will rape our precious white women. That's what they do. It all started with Ham."

That is the message Jennings is feeding his congregants. - Christians, and indeed the entire world, have a multitude of problems right now, all of which our Lord can and will handle.

To turn aside to dark unbiblical messages of hatred disguised as Christianity is to be diverted from the path of life on which God guides us.

The time is too short, life is too short for such blind, unreasoning, unreasonable, and most of all non-Biblical blind hatred.

Jesus chided the religious leaders of his day that they couldn't read the signs of the times (Matthew 16:1-4).

In reading these signs of the times, however, we are not to despair, but are to keep our eyes on Jesus.

1 Peter 5:7 "Cast all your anxiety on Him, because He cares for you."

Philippians 4:6: "Be anxious for nothing, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God."

Rose42

I read about this guy. He is spreading lies. Simple as that.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

Can you prove that he's spreading lies?

Here's some things you need to know because you are a citizen of this country.

https://in-this-together.com/who-are-the-new-world-order-a-brief-history/

The New World Order - Who Are They and Where Do They Come From?
======

Bill Gates is a Jew who wants to depopulate the world.

https://real-truth-seekers.com/bill-gates-depopulation-control/

Bill Gates Depopulation Plandemic | CO2 ( “Climate Control”)
(Remember, Gates is NOT a scientist or a doctor)

BTW, Co2 is good for plants.
======

Here are families of Jews that I hate:

Rose42

He makes up his own theology and lies about whats in the bible. He preaches hate which isn’t Christian nor is it Christian that there are inferior races. Thats not in the bible.

Read Zemirah’s post. Thats the best collection of info I found on this false teacher.

The new world order, etc are different subjects and not for this section.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

I beg to differ with you. The "beasts of the field" is an inferior race. Seems you don't know much about what God's word really says.

Rose42

I’m no expert but know enough to know he’s a false teacher that promotes hate. No question about it.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

You are mimicking Satan when he spoke through the serpent.

Genesis 3:1 "The serpent was more crafty than any "beast of the field" that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say...?"

Genesis 2:20 "Out of the ground the Lord God formed every "beast of the field" and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name.

To what chapter(s), and verse(s) of which book(s) of the Bible are you referring?

There is only one race - the human race. Within the human race is diversity in skin color and other physical characteristics.

Because Adam and Eve possessed the genes to produce black, brown, tan, red, yellow and white offspring (and everything else in between), God desired humanity to be diverse in appearance.

The only survivors of the flood: Noah and his wife, Noah’s three sons and their wives - eight people in all (Genesis 7:13), were the parents of every human being upon the earth today, which means they possessed the genetics to produce children of every race.

Because God did not choose to further elaborate on mankind's different skin tones, it has no importance.

We are all the same race, all created by the same God, all created for the same purpose - to glorify Him.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

Rose, I have always thought that those who can find nothing about themselves to be proud, other than their own skintone, is truly to be pitied, for it is something over which they had no control.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

Be more concerned that you, yourself, are spreading lies, lies that were proven to be lies over one hundred years ago.

"The Lie That Will Not Die: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"
https://fathomjournal.org/the-lie-that-will-not-die-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion/

"Any researcher of anti-Semitism will, over time, accumulate a collection of strange books, pamphlets and other writings generated by obsessives and conspiracy theorists from around the world, all of which claim to reveal that Jews – in various guises and under various titles – pull the strings of politicians, manipulate public opinion via control of the media and, in general, dictate the course of major world events. Most of this literature, if we can call it that, derives, either directly or indirectly, from the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion;" and the variety of editions and versions of this malicious piece of fakery gives some idea of the universal appeal and political utility of the lying tale "The Protocols" falsely claims to tell."

Even the "White Pride" website: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1180723/
calls your false Abe Foxman quote a lie:

"The only sites that carry this don't list any source. to me, it looks like a fake "anti-semitic' quote."

Wikipedia acknowledges it is a lie: "Subject: "Antisemitic conspiracy theory" - "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" or "The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion" is a fabricated anti-semitic text purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination."

One hundred years ago, in 1921 New York Herald reporter Herman Bernstein published "The History of a Lie: The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion," - the first exposure of the Protocols as a fraud for an American audience.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

"Because Adam and Eve possessed the genes to produce black, brown, tan, red, yellow and white offspring (and everything else in between), God desired humanity to be diverse in appearance." NOT TRUE!!

https://ccofct.blogspot.com/2015/02/who-are-beasts-of-field-part-1.html

Who Are The Beasts of The Field? Part 1
In multiple places in the Bible there are references to the word “beast”, and, or, "Beasts Of The Field."
An example of this word and phrase that is germane to this particular post is the following: “But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily unto God.” Jonah 3:8. This verse says the word man and also refers to something called a beast that cover themselves with sackcloth. What is this beast that the Bible talks about?

There seems to be a natural tendency for the modern day Judeo-Christian to read right over the word “beast” and think it means cattle, or when specifically shown that it doesn't mean cattle they just simply dismiss it as being a descendant of Adam or in this particular case Israelites (Jonah was tasked to preach to the Israelites that were in the Assyrian captivity in Ninevah). When specifically referring to cattle in this verse, never in my lifetime, have I ever seen a four legged creature cover themselves in sackcloth and repent to God as in the story of Jonah. If referring to the Adamite man, or an Israelite, then all one has to do is read the book of Genesis to know that Adam was created in Chapter 2 of Genesis after the animals and other life forms were created during the 7 days of Chapter 1. Adam being separate from other life forms is exemplified in Genesis 5:1.

https://christiansfortruth.com/man-and-beast-in-the-bible-who-they-are-and-who-they-are-not/

Man And Beast In The Bible — Who They Are And Who They Are Not]

As Comparet demonstrates, the notion that all “races” of people are descendants of Adam — or that the term “Man” refers to all peoples of the earth — is simply not supported by a close reading of Scripture.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

There is enough that is authentically written in the Bible to spend a lifetime reading, studying, praying for God's guidance, and attempting to live out it's message.

Everything you write here, everyone you quote, are "Christian Identity - White Supremacist," their message is one of hatred against the Jewish people, and they go to great lengths to misrepresent God's Word.

"Christian Identity" Clifton A. Emahiser established Non-Universal Teaching Ministries and the website emahiser.christogenea is “the official site for Clifton Emahiser’s Watchman’s Teaching Ministries.”

https://christogenea.org › podcasts › identifying-biblical-“beast-field”-part-1

IDENTIFYING THE "BEAST OF THE FIELD", #1. Clifton A. Emahiser's Teaching Ministries: "For many years I have held the position that the Biblical designation "beast of the field" often is an idiomatic expression for the non-Adamic races (i.e., such as the negroid and mongoloid, which I prefer not to capitalize)."

From a critique of Clifton A. Emahiser’s attempt to change Scripture to validate his serpent seed of Satan theory:

https://truefreethinker.com/clifton-a-emahisers-serpent-seed-of-satan-theory/

"But since Clifton A. Emahiser’s aim is to solve the issue with ‘eth and not removing the Hebrew for YHVH-LORD from the manuscripts the new rendering would be even stranger and incoherent as it would read something to the likes of “…I have gotten a man with Sammael-the Angel (of death)-the angel of the LORD, the LORD.”

"...Of course, how one translates ‘eth or whether it should be ‘oth cannot possible lead to such a radical and very late dated invention of what Genesis 4:1 is stating.'
"Also, that 'Aramaic was merely one of the languages which Messiah and his disciples knew' has, of course, utterly nothing to do with inventing tall tales to insert into Genesis 4:1 without any historical warrant."

Clifton A. Emahiser also quotes The Palestinian Targum, apparently not realizing that this title is merely an aka (also known as) for the previously quoted Targum Pseudo-Jonathan which is aka Targum of Jonathan Ben Uzziel; since he is quoting the same Targum twice the quotes are, of course, the same.

"Concluding that “this evidence brings the Scriptures into context” he then quotes Clarke’s Commentary, vol. 1, p. 58 within the context of correlating Genesis 4:1 and 1 John 3:12:

"Clarke, whom he misquotes, does not even hint at Cain being the son of Sammael-the Angel (of death)-the angel of the LORD but reasons that Eve, 'acknowledge that it was through God’s peculiar blessing… From The Lord, or through the Divine blessing.' And now you know why Emahiser did not quote that portion from Clarke."

"Clifton A. Emahiser mangled the Holy Bible in his attempt to prove his Satanic theory that Cain was born the Seed of the Serpent, and was not the son of Adam."

Books listed by "Christian Identity" - "White Supremacist," Bertrand L. Comparet, whom you also quote:

Genesis and the Creation of the non-Adamic races.
Yahweh Commands Racial Segregation
The Bible Is Not a Jewish Book
Adam Was Not the First Man
Noah's Flood Was Not World Wide
The Cain/Satanic Seed Line
The Destiny of Our Race

Below are accurate current translations of Jonah 3:8, in context, contributing both accuracy and common sense to correct, and to disprove your claim (taken out of context) that the KJV: "But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily unto God."
means that the beast is actually a man, but not one descended from Adam.

MSG Jonah 3:6-9
"When the message reached the king of Nineveh, he got up off his throne, threw down his royal robes, dressed in burlap, and sat down in the dirt.
Then he issued a public proclamation throughout Nineveh, authorized by him and his leaders: “Not one drop of water, not one bite of food for man, woman, or animal, including your herds and flocks!
Dress them all, both people and animals, in burlap, and send up a cry for help to God.
Everyone must turn around, turn back from an evil life and the violent ways that stain their hands. Who knows? Maybe God will turn around and change his mind about us, quit being angry with us and let us live!”

NASB
"But every person and animal must be covered with sackcloth; and people are to call on God vehemently, and they are to turn, each one from his evil way, and from the violence which is in their hands."

CEV
"Then he and his officials sent out an order for everyone in the city to obey.
It said: None of you or your animals may eat or drink a thing.
Each of you must wear sackcloth, and you must even put sackcloth on your animals.
You must also pray to the Lord God with all your heart and stop being sinful and cruel.
Maybe God will change his mind and have mercy on us, so we won’t be destroyed."

Rose42

There is also absolutely nothing in the New Testament that would suggest some people are inferior to others. Jesus had dark skin and he sure never advocated white supremacy.

I hope Ginny’s eyes get opened.

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

I thought I would help you out and copy just a part of your very informative article from Christiansfortruth.com that you have copied in your above post……I can’t imagine why you didn’t choose to share it!? 👿

This does NOT represent what a Christian believes……..It represents RACISM and White Supremacy! It is filled with lies and HATE! It is clear that you have never actually studied the Bible. I’ve read some trash on the internet, but this one is of the Devil himself! You claim to be a conservative and an avid Trump supporter……I have news for you….Trump would have no part of you or those that support this kind of Hate of Israel or people who’s skin is not white!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The second chapter of Genesis tells us that God is looking for a suitable wife for Adam and brings in review before him what your King James version of the Bible calls “every beast of the field” to see if a good wife for Adam could be found among them. Now do you really think that an all-wise God had to carefully look over a female scorpion, a female toad, a female giraffe and a female elephant to decide whether one of these would be a suitable wife for Adam? Of course not — and Moses didn’t write any such foolishness when he wrote the book of Genesis — this is purely the work of translators.

In the original Hebrew, the account makes good sense, and it tells us much about these other races. There are two closely-related Hebrew words used here — khah-ee and khaw-yaw — each of which means “a living creature”. And the meaning is far too broad to be translated merely “beast” or “animal” — for it includes all living creatures — from microbes to men. Where the King James version says “beast of the field,” the word is always either khah-ee or khaw-yah. So a correct translation would be “the living beings” in the country.

That these “living beings” include varieties of “men” is clear from the same word being applied to Adam himself. You have read Genesis 2, verse 7, “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.” In the Hebrew it reads, “Then Yahweh God formed the Awdawm out of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the Awhwam became nephesh khaw-yah — that is, a breathing creature having life. So the “beast of the field” — the kaw-kaw-yah of the field — or more correctly, “the living beings in the countryside” — actually included “men” — the pre-Adamic races.

Now Genesis 2, verses 18 to 20, makes sense. God saw that Adam needed a wife and — not condemning anybody without a fair chance to make good — God carefully looked over the pre-Adamic races — which were the African and the Asiatic races — to see if one of them could be found who was suitable to be Adam’s wife and the mother of the new race, but he couldn’t find one — because of woman from one of these races could only bear children who were half-Negro or half-Mongol.

In the Hebrew this reads thus:

And Yahweh God said, Not good for the Awdawm to be alone. I shall make him a helper, as his counterpart. And God formed from the ground every living being of the fields and every fowl of the heavens and bringeth in unto the Awdawm to see what he doth call it; and whatever the Awdawm calleth “nephesh kahw-yaw” — [that is, a breathing creature having life] — that is its name. And the Awdawm calleth names to all the cattle and to fowl of the heavens and to every living being of the fields, and to him hath not been found an helper as his counterpart.


That is, God recognized that Adam’s wife must be his counterpart — having the same qualities of spiritual understanding to be able to transmit to her descendants the same qualities for which God specially created and placed Adam in the world. But God could not find even one out of these pre-Adamic peoples who was Adam’s counterpart having these necessary qualities.

Now before someone gets the idea that I hate other races, let’s look at this thing a little closer. The Black race has been on earth at least 40,000 years — for identifiable negroid skeletons have been discovered which can be scientifically dated by the radiocarbon and other radio processes as that old. Yet in all these 40,000 years there has never been a Negro civilization. Yes, I know that a few Negro tribal chiefs have conquered other tribes and built themselves up a larger kingdom. But it takes more than the brutal tyranny of a successful war chief to make a civilization — and that was all they had.

Don’t speak of Egypt — Egypt was in Africa but never negroid. The beautiful portrait sculptures left by the ancient Egyptians show them to have been clearly a pure White people. In the days of Egypt’s greatness, any Negro found north of the first cataract of the Nile River was summarily killed on sight.

It has been proved that you can either teach either a Negro or a chimpanzee to ride a bicycle, but all the eons of time have never sufficed to teach either a Negro or a chimpanzee to invent a bicycle. We don’t hate Negroes — we want them to be well-fed, well-clothed, comfortably housed and in no danger of being eaten by other Negroes — and that’s something they have never had except in a civilization created and maintained by White men.

Despite all the propaganda that you hear, every Negro in the United States is far better off than those in Africa. Just try to find any Negro here who wants to go back to any Black nation in Africa. But neither Negroes nor Whites will have the blessings of civilization in a nation which is reduced to Black standards of thinking. If they were capable of producing a civilization at all, 40,000 years is long enough to do it.

Yes, I know that in Asia — 2,300 years ago — Confucius taught some high ethical principles, but without a word of religion in them. And I know that the Ming Dynasty saw the production of some nice pieces of porcelain, but what did either of these do for the Asiatic people? Did it ever teach them how to produce enough food to fill those fine porcelain bowls? Shouldn’t 2,300 years of Confucian philosophy be enough to develop something more than poverty, filth, disease and misery? Again, the Asiatic mind lacks the true spiritual understanding which God saw was needed. Aren’t the Asiatics who live in the United States better off than those who live in Red China, Korea or Southeast Asia? We don’t hate them, but we don’t want them to reduce us to their level. That’s what God was talking about in the second chapter of Genesis when He said that the other beings who lived in the country round about Adam could not produce a suitable wife for Adam as his counterpart.

Because of the spiritual understanding which God put in the Awdawm, today the White race has the highest civilization, the greatest freedom — the highest standard of living in the world. They are the so-called “have nations”. We haven’t hated the other races — we’ve tried to help them, to show them our ways, but all of them — without exception — have hated us. In the centuries when we were very few against their many, they repeatedly tried to conquer and destroy us. And only God’s watchful care over His people kept that from happening — although several times they came dangerously close to success.

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

You are a typical Judeo-Christian (an oxymoron) who believes all the lies! Have you ever asked yourself what happened to the descendants of Ishmael or Esau?

We are NOT all the same race - strikes me funny - just ask a Jew, even they believe they are of a different race.