A furious backlash to Biden, Garland plan (Page 2): My post was intended to point out how ludicrous Cuda’s suggestion was. Of all your comments above, I can only agree with you on the...

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

permafrost wrote:

Surprising that suicide has stayed relativly stable.. so sad.

good information, but as I view it. the insurance companies have long refused to pay or even cover those with many of these major deseses..

But than , along came Obama care and saved the day.. also called the ACA...

we used to seem many arguments for excluding those with these many high cost health problems..

NO, we can not go back to those days..

My post was intended to point out how ludicrous Cuda’s suggestion was. Of all your comments above, I can only agree with you on the sadness of suicide. Don’t get me started on Obamacare.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

JR-57 wrote:

My post was intended to point out how ludicrous Cuda’s suggestion was. Of all your comments above, I can only agree with you on the sadness of suicide. Don’t get me started on Obamacare.

LOL, OK, time for my feeding anyway.. just for the record, I have never have never used Obama care.. I do know a number of people who consider it a life saver, literally..

sorry I missed your point..

American Vet

Sew_What wrote:

Well, if in fact we take a look e******n officials... (show quote)

And what is "threatening speech"? Telling an uber-l*****t you will be held accountable at the next e******n is NOT threatening. Too many people simply consider someone voicing an opinion they don't like as "threatening".

American Vet

Cuda2020 wrote:

I say, cool, let's let everybody take off their masks and let the pieces fall where they may. Let hospitals insurance companies have a clause for people who didn't get v******ted and landed in the hospital for a month and cover their own cost. I mean why should the insurance co. cover someone who had the prevention at his fingertips. Kinda like not wearing a seat belt. Let them put their own children's life at risk.

And what about those who did get v******ted? Do they have to cover their own costs?

"Prevention at their fingertips"? The CDC disagrees with you - but of course you know more than the CDC. People who have been v******ted can still contract C***d/Spread C***d.

https://www.cdc.gov/c****av***s/2019-ncov/v*****es/effectiveness/why-measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html

Cuda2020

JR-57 wrote:

Let’s do it! But let’s not forget to have people who are obese, overweight, lead an unhealthy life style and have heart disease cover their cost as well. After all, they had simple preventions at their fingertips. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the US.

Ok then lets get out the lawyers and start suing food companies for all covert added sugars, soy, dyes, chemicals and toxins to make us obese and sick, how about that, lets do it! Just think how newborns will appreciate missing the 300 toxins.

Cuda2020

American Vet wrote:

And what about those who did get v******ted? Do they have to cover their own costs?

"Prevention at their fingertips"? The CDC disagrees with you - but of course you know more than the CDC. People who have been v******ted can still contract C***d/Spread C***d.

https://www.cdc.gov/c****av***s/2019-ncov/v*****es/effectiveness/why-measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html

No, Uncle Sam is doing that for us, isn't that great!

Cuda2020

American Vet wrote:

And what about those who did get v******ted? Do they have to cover their own costs?

"Prevention at their fingertips"? The CDC disagrees with you - but of course you know more than the CDC. People who have been v******ted can still contract C***d/Spread C***d.

https://www.cdc.gov/c****av***s/2019-ncov/v*****es/effectiveness/why-measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html

I really do h**e stupid comments like that. Show me exactly what the CDC is disagreeing to. Nothing in the world of prevention is 100%, such as condoms, does that mean we should stop using them? Does it prevent most pregnancies, the answer is YES, they do prevent most pregnancies, no not all.

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

Cuda2020 wrote:

Ok then lets get out the lawyers and start suing food companies for all covert added sugars, soy, dyes, chemicals and toxins to make us obese and sick, how about that, lets do it! Just think how newborns will appreciate missing the 300 toxins.

Sue the bastards that are holding you down and force feeding you that garbage Cuda. I think you have a solid case.

Wait a second. You completely trust the CDC / FDA regarding the C***d v*****e but now you’re telling me your beloved FDA is allowing 300 toxins in your food? The FDA. The same FDA that tells you the v*****e is completely safe yet is turning a blind eye to the nasty toxins food manufacturers are using in their products?

Cuda, I’m so confused. Help me understand.

American Vet

Cuda2020 wrote:

I really do h**e stupid comments like that.

Well, how about these stupid comments:

"I say, cool, let's let everybody take off their masks and let the pieces fall where they may. Let hospitals insurance companies have a clause for people who didn't get v******ted and landed in the hospital for a month and cover their own cost. I mean why should the insurance co. cover someone who had the prevention at his fingertips. Kinda like not wearing a seat belt. Let them put their own children's life at risk."

jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana

JR-57 wrote:

Lest we forget; “official business” is the people’s business and the people are finally actively involved.

About time too, hoping more parents speak up at school pta, and school board meetings. They need to get rid of the union!

JR-57 Loc: South Carolina

jSmitty45 wrote:

About time too, hoping more parents speak up at school pta, and school board meetings. They need to get rid of the union!

And the Department of Education. What a fine job they’ve done since their 1980 inception.

Wonttakeitanymore

Kevyn wrote:

I for one am sick and tired of these boorish clueless loudmouths threatening school boards and public health officials. There is a crisp line between stating your opinion during public comment time at open meetings and disrupting official business and threatening the lives of public servants and elected officials. The latter fits the definition of making terrorist threats and should be treated as such.

Do u even have kids?

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

Do u even have kids?

I don't think he can make babies with blow up dolls, maybe he has kittens!

Carol Kelly

microphor wrote:

The Democrat way. It gets worse every time one of them gets into office.

I believe it has reached rock bottom. Our government all the way to the Supreme Court has become despicable. We’re losing freedoms every hour daily it appears.

Smedley_buzkill

Sew_What wrote:

Well, if in fact we take a look e******n officials... (show quote)

I have some fairly pragmatic suggestions for some items Progressives can suck on. Are you eager?