That is the big lie...the drug that the FDA approved is NOT the P****r drug, but P****r and the media want the public to THINK it is. Anyway, it is about the APPROVAL of the different companies' drugs....not what they named them. Although the name of the one company's drug - "Comirnaty" - will help people distinguish whether they are getting the P****r EUA-only drugs, or the BioNTech's approved "Comirnaty" drugs.
The FDA acknowledges that while P****r has insufficient stocks of the newly licensed Comirnaty v*****e available, there is “a significant amount” of the P****r C***D v*****e — produced under E*******y Use A***********n (EUA) — available for use. And THAT is why P****r doesn't want the public to know the difference between the licensed drugs and the ones that are still under the EUA authorization only.
The FDA decrees that the P****r v*****e under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” with the newly licensed Comirnaty product. How is the public going to know the difference? It's a BIG difference - whether you're covered legally and medically or not!!!
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/08/25/2-things-mainstream-media-didnt-tell-you-about-fdas-approval-of-p****r-v*****e/*************************
Dr. Robert Malone claimed the FDA and media were yet again misleading the public, as they had not approved the P****r shot currently given but rather a P****r/BioNTech version that is not yet available. Malone explained:
“The little trick that they’ve done here, is they’ve issued two separate letters for two separate v*****es. The P****r v*****e, which is what is currently available, is still under e*******y use a***********n and it still has the liability shield …
The product that’s licensed is the BioNTech product, which is substantially similar but not necessarily identical, called Comirnaty, and it’s not yet available. They haven’t started manufacturing it or labeling it for general US public use. And that’s the one the liability waiver will no longer apply to.
So, the one that’s actually licensed is not yet available, and when it does become available it will no longer have the liability shield. In the interim, the one that does have the liability shield is the P****r product and that is what is currently available and it’s still under e*******y use a***********n.”
This would mean that if employers demand that employees get v******ted because there’s now a licensed C***D injection, employees could then demand to actually receive the FDA licensed Comirnaty,18 not the emergency use only19 P****r product that is currently given, and for which you cannot sue for damages in case of v*****e injury.
https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2021/09/14/confusion-over-v*****e-approval-two-key-senior-fda-officials-resign-over-v*****e-decisions/*************************
The approval letter sent from the FDA to P****r states in footnote 8,
“The licensed v*****e has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized v*****e and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the v******tion series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness."
The “certain differences” are not specified, but it is perfectly clear that the two jabs are legally distinct.
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=80552That is the big lie...the drug that the FDA approv... (