One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Something to think about.
Page <<first <prev 9 of 10 next>
Sep 13, 2021 20:23:28   #
debeda
 
JFlorio wrote:
Went from Elliot Ness, to clean up my mess.


Good one🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 06:48:21   #
Big Kahuna
 
keepuphope wrote:
What is your profession? Just curious.


Dashy is a Port-O-Potty sniffer. He gets paid below minimum wage $$$ to sniff out foul smelling urinals and holes dug in the ground. He is hoping Slo Joe promotes him to adolescent head sniffer and boob grabber. Why do you think he is a demorat??

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 06:50:28   #
Big Kahuna
 
DASHY wrote:
Brilliant catch! My point was that everybody makes spelling "misteaks" now and then. You should not feel like an i***t for making a spelling error. The words that suggest you are an i***t is when you make the broad statement about "most democrats are mentally ill." Even you must know that is not true.


Leftism is a mental disease to which most demonrats are adherent to.

Reply
 
 
Sep 14, 2021 06:58:14   #
Big Kahuna
 
DASHY wrote:
I am a licensed Certified Public Accountant.


Probably hired by Lois Lerner, of IRS fame and an Obamma lackey and tyrant, who went after innocent Conservatives and Trump supporters to make sure they dotted their "i"'s and crossed their "t''s" or you would slap them with an audit and take their homes from them if their statements were off by a penny. However, auditing the Corrupt Clinton's and their Clinton Foundation and were off limits to boneheads like you.

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 07:00:14   #
Big Kahuna
 
America 1 wrote:
So you practice lumping?


More like humping.

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 07:02:02   #
Big Kahuna
 
JFlorio wrote:
Amen brother. He is the opposite of what you used to think of when you heard the words G Man.


Comey was more like an "OH" man. An Ovommit and Hitlery thug.

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 10:56:07   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
drlarrygino wrote:
More like humping.


I thought he might lump figures, but humping could be, "you know the thing."

Reply
 
 
Sep 14, 2021 10:59:07   #
DASHY
 
drlarrygino wrote:
Dashy is a Port-O-Potty sniffer. He gets paid below minimum wage $$$ to sniff out foul smelling urinals and holes dug in the ground. He is hoping Slo Joe promotes him to adolescent head sniffer and boob grabber. Why do you think he is a demorat??


More projection of your own miserable status?

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 11:42:56   #
Big Kahuna
 
DASHY wrote:
More projection of your own miserable status?


You have no status. You might as well dress up in a habib and walk behind your esteemed Taiban freedom fighters like Slo Joe appears to be doing. No wonder Slo joe gets no respect in the world.

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 19:31:50   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
DASHY wrote:
You might want to check out your own mental acuity before you tell us how you lumped (lumpped) people together.


Dashy, can you read this???

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Did you know people read words as whole units, not letter-by-letter.???
Did you also know “we’re code-making machines” (we speak the code of English) and we’re wired to find meaning out of nonsense, in part by looking at contextual cues....

So, curious, could you read the above???

I sure hope so, I make mistakes all the time mostly from being in a hurry and not proofing as I should or reading it as I typed it even if I am methodical in proofing...And believe it or not when I use the speaker talk feature that thing will change my words to something else even if proofed earlier..

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 19:36:50   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
JFlorio wrote:
Have never seen the capital described like you just did, by anyone. So, another lie from you, but there is hope. You called it a r**t instead of an i**********n like you used to. A little f**e fight is all progressives have the guts for.


“A little f**e fight is all progressives have the guts for.” AKA~~~ Keyboard Commandos...

Reply
 
 
Sep 14, 2021 20:35:41   #
keepuphope Loc: Idaho
 
lindajoy wrote:
Dashy, can you read this???

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Did you know people read words as whole units, not letter-by-letter.???
Did you also know “we’re code-making machines” (we speak the code of English) and we’re wired to find meaning out of nonsense, in part by looking at contextual cues....

So, curious, could you read the above???

I sure hope so, I make mistakes all the time mostly from being in a hurry and not proofing as I should or reading it as I typed it even if I am methodical in proofing...And believe it or not when I use the speaker talk feature that thing will change my words to something else even if proofed earlier..
Dashy, can you read this??? br br Aoccdrnig to a ... (show quote)


And yes actually it was quite easy to read.

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 20:59:57   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
keepuphope wrote:
And yes actually it was quite easy to read.


Exactly~~~those whom find the need to correct the error and do so simply to ingratiate oneself into something better than~~< typically falling short within their own shortcoming(s)....

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 22:41:45   #
DASHY
 
lindajoy wrote:
Dashy, can you read this???

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Did you know people read words as whole units, not letter-by-letter.???
Did you also know “we’re code-making machines” (we speak the code of English) and we’re wired to find meaning out of nonsense, in part by looking at contextual cues....

So, curious, could you read the above???

I sure hope so, I make mistakes all the time mostly from being in a hurry and not proofing as I should or reading it as I typed it even if I am methodical in proofing...And believe it or not when I use the speaker talk feature that thing will change my words to something else even if proofed earlier..
Dashy, can you read this??? br br Aoccdrnig to a ... (show quote)


Making excuses for failures or making "misteaks" is a Trumster trait. I didn't lose the 2020 e******n. It was stolen from me.

Reply
Sep 14, 2021 22:47:50   #
DASHY
 
keepuphope wrote:
And yes actually it was quite easy to read.


keepuphope is proud to tell us he can read the scrambled words. Good for you. You get a star.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 10 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.