One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
More good news!
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jul 27, 2021 22:40:04   #
Kevyn
 
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.

Reply
Jul 27, 2021 22:47:36   #
Airforceone
 
Kevyn wrote:
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.
Former Trump administration officials can testify ... (show quote)


Really doesn’t make any difference Trump supporters will not believe anything that committee finds.

Reply
Jul 27, 2021 22:53:59   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Airforceone wrote:
Really doesn’t make any difference Trump supporters will not believe anything that committee finds.


How was rehab?

Reply
 
 
Jul 27, 2021 23:27:31   #
steve66613
 
JFlorio wrote:
How was rehab?


Guess there’s no rehab for stupid.

Reply
Jul 27, 2021 23:29:42   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Kevyn wrote:
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.
Former Trump administration officials can testify ... (show quote)


The political committee of a f**e i**********n representing a f**e president and a f**e natural v***s! You guys are pathetic! Satan rules your lying hearts! Celebrate that zombies!

Reply
Jul 27, 2021 23:46:02   #
DaWg44
 
Kevyn wrote:
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.
Former Trump administration officials can testify ... (show quote)


Kevina, take your hormone shots & get to your sponsor. You are in danger of total brain impairment by fecal matter.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 01:39:22   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Kevyn wrote:
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.
Former Trump administration officials can testify ... (show quote)


Just like the C*****l P****e, they'll cherry-pick only those who support Pelosi's narrative. She and Schmucky should be the ones forced to testify.

The J****** 6th committee is loaded up with Democrats and RINOs who led an impeachment against Donald Trump. Why didn’t the C*****l p****e officers who let the r****rs into the Capitol building testify? Nancy Pelosi is cherry-picking which officers testify or which do not. At no time did she hold a single hearing on the i**********n that happened occurred on federal courts in cities across the country. Instead, she called law enforcement officers “storm-troopers.”

GOP’s AM presser counters Pelosi’s ‘sham’ hearing with questions they want answered about J*** 6
July 27, 2021 | Jon Dougherty



A group of Republican lawmakers ripped House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at a press conference in Washington, D.C., Tuesday morning after she made an unprecedented decision last week to block two GOP members from serving on a committee she formed to look into the J*** 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol Building.

Vowing to get to the bottom of what led to the incursion including any neglect on the part of the Speaker herself, one Republican after another accused Pelosi of politicizing the investigation by blocking GOP members she is afraid will ask probing questions that could embarrass her or otherwise dispute the Democratic narrative that former President Donald Trump is solely to blame.

Scalise on Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, the two Republicans Pelosi refused to put on the J*** 6 select committee:

“They got canceled by this new cancel culture that we see moving throughout the country, led by Speaker Pelosi and a lot of her socialist allies here in Congress." pic.twitter.com/PYNHitRPJc

— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) July 27, 2021

“December 14, the leadership knew there was a problem,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, adding that lawmakers were aware of structural and organizational problems within the C*****l P****e that Democrats refused to address.

“There’s questions into the leadership within the structure of the Speaker’s office where they denied the ability to bring the National Guard here” ahead of the January date when Congress met to certify the e*****rs for President Joe Biden.

McCarthy, ahead of the first J*** 6 select committee hearing, predicts it will be a “failed committee and a failed report. A sham that nobody can believe.” pic.twitter.com/2TRdqJZpXl

— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) July 27, 2021

“For weeks now, [Reps.] Jim Jordan [Ohio] and Jim Banks [Indiana] have been raising some very tough questions — questions that need to be answered about why Speaker Pelosi didn’t make sure that C*****l P****e had all the tools they needed to be prepared for that day,” House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said.

“Now, maybe because they were raising those questions, they got canceled by this new cancel culture that we see moving throughout the country, led by Speaker Pelosi and a lot of her socialist allies here in Congress, where they shut out tough questions that they don’t want to be asked or answered,” he added.

House Conference Chair Elise Stefanik of New York added that Pelosi “is the most disliked elected official in America.”

“She always puts her own partisan politics over what’s best for the American people,” Stefanik added. “She is an authoritarian who has broken the people’s House. She is a lame-duck Speaker and everyone knows it.

“The reason why Pelosi is refusing to seat accomplished and well-respected, hard-working Republicans like Jim Jordan and Jim Banks is because she doesn’t want the American people to know the t***h or learn the facts” about what happened before and during the Capitol protest, the New York Republican continued.

House GOP conference chair Elise Stefanik on Pelosi: “She’s an authoritarian who has broken the peoples’ house. She’s a lame duck speaker and everyone knows it.” pic.twitter.com/A1y8t5KYi5

— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) July 27, 2021

“When you spend a year talking about defunding the police and actually defund the police, it’s kinda hard to have more police here [at the Capitol] on J*** 6 like they should have done,” Jordan, one of the two who, along with Banks, was blocked from serving on the 1*6 c*******e by Pelosi.

He went on to say that C*****l P****e “deserved to have more help” on J*** 6, “but the Democrats couldn’t do it because of the political conditions they created all throughout last year.”

Banks acknowledged that the 1*6 C*******e, which also met for the first time Tuesday, would be hearing from several C*****l P****e officers who will testify to harrowing accounts with some Capitol protesters, but added they may not have had to face such dire circumstances were it not for Pelosi’s alleged negligence.

He also railed at the Speaker for barring him from serving on her committee.

“It’s clear at this point that Nancy Pelosi has cherry-picked the members to serve on this committee,” he said. “She’s pre-written a narrative. Only members who will stick to her talking points are allowed to serve on this committee.

“If this is truly a fact-finding mission to make sure that J*** 6 never happens again, this isn’t what that looks like,” the Indiana Republican added.

Monday evening, Democratic leaders rejected an 11th-hour attempt by McCarthy to seat his original five choices on the committee.

“For the first known time in the history of the House, the speaker of the House rejected two of the minority leader’s nominees to a select committee,” said McCarthy’s resolution. “Speaker Pelosi’s own press office acknowledged that this was an ‘unprecedented decision.’

“Speaker Pelosi’s refusal to seat all five Republican members directly harms the legitimacy, credibility, and integrity of the select committee,” it added.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2021 01:45:10   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Kevyn wrote:
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.
Former Trump administration officials can testify ... (show quote)


Ashli Babbitt’s mom: Nancy Pelosi orchestrated the k*****g of my daughter
After nearly eight months of questions and controversy surrounding the events of J*** 6, the most prominent question remains unanswered: Who k**led Ashli Babbitt?

By Tarra Snyder, Western Journalism, July 25, 2021: July 26, 2021:

Michelle Witthoeft, Babbitt’s mother, says Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is responsible for her daughter’s death.

“My daughter was a California constituent, and Nancy Pelosi not only, I feel like, orchestrated the death of my daughter.”

“I’ve reached out to Nancy Pelosi’s office several times, and she has yet to call me back because she’s too busy playing in her clubhouse with all of her elite people,” Witthoeft said.

She also reminded Nancy of her place in the government.
Trending:
Reporter Caught Smearing Herself with Mud to Make It Look Like She Helped with Disaster Cleanup

“You know, it’s the people’s house. It’s not your house, Nancy. It’s the people’s house. That’s my message to Nancy Pelosi,” Witthoeft said.

Despite the many claims of violence that occurred on J*** 6, evidence has yet to surface suggesting Babbitt herself was reckless or threatening.

An earlier report from The Western Journal found that there had been no documented reports of Babbitt starting fires or attacking police officers.

Her mother wants to know who is responsible for her death.

“The C*****l P****e should be held accountable like every other police department in the country.”

Witthoeft isn’t the only one fighting for Babbitt.

In a July 1 statement, former President Donald Trump asked only the following question: “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?”
Advertisement – story continues below
Trump’s statement brought national awareness to the issue, causing Babbitt’s name to trend on Twitter.

Back in April, Babbitt’s family announced that they were suing the C*****l P****e for “at least $10 million” in damages.
Advertisement – story continues below

For the suit to be successful, the family would have to prove that the officer responsible had used “constitutionally unreasonable” force against Babbitt.

On April 14, after conducting an investigation, the Department of Justice released a statement on the matter.

“Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so ‘willfully,’ which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law,” the DOJ said.

“As this requirement has been interpreted by the courts, evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent required under Section 242.”

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 02:56:11   #
EmilyD
 
Airforceone wrote:
Really doesn’t make any difference Trump supporters will not believe anything that committee finds.


A committee appointed by a Speaker who viciously h**es Trump....made up of Democrats and RINO's? You are absolutely correct.

Nancy Pelosi, who has shown the world repeatedly how much she h**es Trump (and how serious her TDS is), has NO business appointing a committee...or any committees...whose job it is to investigate someone she is so biased against! Pelosi, as Speaker, is supposed to at least pretend that she is non-partisan...she has shown that she is way far from that.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 07:36:46   #
Kevyn
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Ashli Babbitt’s mom: Nancy Pelosi orchestrated the k*****g of my daughter
After nearly eight months of questions and controversy surrounding the events of J*** 6, the most prominent question remains unanswered: Who k**led Ashli Babbitt?

By Tarra Snyder, Western Journalism, July 25, 2021: July 26, 2021:

Michelle Witthoeft, Babbitt’s mother, says Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is responsible for her daughter’s death.

“My daughter was a California constituent, and Nancy Pelosi not only, I feel like, orchestrated the death of my daughter.”

“I’ve reached out to Nancy Pelosi’s office several times, and she has yet to call me back because she’s too busy playing in her clubhouse with all of her elite people,” Witthoeft said.

She also reminded Nancy of her place in the government.
Trending:
Reporter Caught Smearing Herself with Mud to Make It Look Like She Helped with Disaster Cleanup

“You know, it’s the people’s house. It’s not your house, Nancy. It’s the people’s house. That’s my message to Nancy Pelosi,” Witthoeft said.

Despite the many claims of violence that occurred on J*** 6, evidence has yet to surface suggesting Babbitt herself was reckless or threatening.

An earlier report from The Western Journal found that there had been no documented reports of Babbitt starting fires or attacking police officers.

Her mother wants to know who is responsible for her death.

“The C*****l P****e should be held accountable like every other police department in the country.”

Witthoeft isn’t the only one fighting for Babbitt.

In a July 1 statement, former President Donald Trump asked only the following question: “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?”
Advertisement – story continues below
Trump’s statement brought national awareness to the issue, causing Babbitt’s name to trend on Twitter.

Back in April, Babbitt’s family announced that they were suing the C*****l P****e for “at least $10 million” in damages.
Advertisement – story continues below

For the suit to be successful, the family would have to prove that the officer responsible had used “constitutionally unreasonable” force against Babbitt.

On April 14, after conducting an investigation, the Department of Justice released a statement on the matter.

“Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so ‘willfully,’ which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law,” the DOJ said.

“As this requirement has been interpreted by the courts, evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent required under Section 242.”
Ashli Babbitt’s mom: Nancy Pelosi orchestrated the... (show quote)

You are clutching your pearls over a dead terrorist, get over it.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 11:50:18   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Kevyn wrote:
You are clutching your pearls over a dead terrorist, get over it.


I see you're still listening to mainstream media propaganda. And what do you call the people who were r**ting and l**ting, trying to burn down a federal courthouse last summer? Mostly peaceful? Remember the Puerto Rican separatists who shot and wounded five members of Congress in the House chambers in the mid-1950s? How about the Weather Underground who set off a bomb in the Capitol in the 1970s? Your thinking is corrupted by an asymmetrical view of events propagated by media propaganda. Even A****a and B*M tried to burn down a church in Lafayette Park has been proven to be the result of their mental illness, suffering from TDS.

Ashli Babbitt was unarmed. No one is making excuses for her actions. However, the C*****l p****e officer who shot her has yet to have been officially identified. If Babbitt had been Black, B*M and all the other purveyors of r****m would have been r**ting and l**ting D.C.

Pull that pea-sized brain of yours out of the hole where the sun doesn't shine so you can see and hear the t***h of empirical facts as they really are.

Reply
 
 
Jul 28, 2021 13:39:46   #
WEBCO
 
Kevyn wrote:
You are clutching your pearls over a dead terrorist, get over it.


F*&k you...That "dead terrorist" was a US service member.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 14:34:19   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
WEBCO wrote:
F*&k you...That "dead terrorist" was a US service member.


I know you mean this will all due respect!

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 16:18:01   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Kevyn wrote:
Former Trump administration officials can testify to Congress about Donald Trump’s role in the deadly January attack on the Capitol and his efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 e******n, the justice department (DoJ) has said in a letter obtained by the Guardian.

The move by the justice department to decline to assert executive privilege for Trump’s acting attorney general, Jeffrey Rosen, clears the path for other top former officials to also testify to congressional committees investigating the Capitol attack without fear of repercussions.

The justice department authorised witnesses to appear specifically before the two committees. But a DoJ official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said they expected that approval to extend to the 6 January select committee.
Former Trump administration officials can testify ... (show quote)



Dem Who Wants to Defund the Police BUSTED COLD After Taking One Look At Her Expenses

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-zVm4nl6dg

Mike LaChance from American Lookout reports, Have you noticed that many of the Democrats who want to take away your police are not willing to go without security for themselves? Two members of the city council in Minneapolis who called for defunding police have private security.

Reply
Jul 28, 2021 18:06:08   #
WEBCO
 
dtucker300 wrote:
I know you mean this will all due respect!


No, I meant that as a veteran, telling a panty waste to shut their trap about things that they don't understand. To stop disrespecting the very people that gave this low life their ability to speak freely.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.