One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Fighting for Election Integrity in Arizona: Results are In
Jul 22, 2021 08:04:16   #
Radiance3
 
Audit results disclosed massive evidences of fraud on various ways in AZ. Decertification is necessary to correct.
==================

https://www.facebook.com/100070588512115/videos/4966856010007951/?__cft__[0]=AZURHM3yZ8PghlCLmBmtl767JeMPXv3ouimlMt0LSKPCFehNJEOlE_GrhF94x6SnGhUB58-TEfpb4X0V0UlboJD8Gf6jLxqVmWtvw0QbECLNcy0ggCa4gbSfDtU2y4aBZw0VXJLVEq9-BFuzEl-AEfQ9xw5441Xnmsc9xXWMctVUrMfnoOBsWfWmSEq_6EwA0A8&__tn__=%2CO-R

Reply
Jul 22, 2021 09:16:15   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Audit results disclosed massive evidences of fraud on various ways in AZ. Decertification is necessary to correct.
==================

https://www.facebook.com/100070588512115/videos/4966856010007951/?__cft__[0]=AZURHM3yZ8PghlCLmBmtl767JeMPXv3ouimlMt0LSKPCFehNJEOlE_GrhF94x6SnGhUB58-TEfpb4X0V0UlboJD8Gf6jLxqVmWtvw0QbECLNcy0ggCa4gbSfDtU2y4aBZw0VXJLVEq9-BFuzEl-AEfQ9xw5441Xnmsc9xXWMctVUrMfnoOBsWfWmSEq_6EwA0A8&__tn__=%2CO-R


How many different times and different ways are the results of the as yet uncompleted audit going to be posted here?

Reply
Jul 22, 2021 09:21:21   #
zombinis
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Audit results disclosed massive evidences of fraud on various ways in AZ. Decertification is necessary to correct.
==================

https://www.facebook.com/100070588512115/videos/4966856010007951/?__cft__[0]=AZURHM3yZ8PghlCLmBmtl767JeMPXv3ouimlMt0LSKPCFehNJEOlE_GrhF94x6SnGhUB58-TEfpb4X0V0UlboJD8Gf6jLxqVmWtvw0QbECLNcy0ggCa4gbSfDtU2y4aBZw0VXJLVEq9-BFuzEl-AEfQ9xw5441Xnmsc9xXWMctVUrMfnoOBsWfWmSEq_6EwA0A8&__tn__=%2CO-R


That the video has been modified to get a expected response , it has more of a speakover then what the subject is proably saying. The following link is from the office of Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs it deals with the obsevation made at the audit. It is more dependable then the video. The results from this audit are more questionable according to the observations.

https://azsos.gov/about-office/media-center/documents/coliseum-observer-notes-2021

Reply
 
 
Jul 22, 2021 09:30:17   #
Radiance3
 
zombinis wrote:
That the video has been modified to get a expected response , it has more of a speakover then what the subject is proably saying. The following link is from the office of Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs it deals with the obsevation made at the audit. It is more dependable then the video. The results from this audit are more questionable according to the observations.

https://azsos.gov/about-office/media-center/documents/coliseum-observer-notes-2021


==================
Democrats are fighting tooth and nail to deny their crimes. Because some of them who committed fraud will go to jail. Now begins the wrestle of the justice system.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 01:56:34   #
zombinis
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
Democrats are fighting tooth and nail to deny their crimes. Because some of them who committed fraud will go to jail. Now begins the wrestle of the justice system.


So you are saying that the observation seen at the audit area are being seen by dems only. Even if they are being seen only by one group what does it say about the other group who doesn't see that the controls that were put into place which served very well for the last several elections. Were brought up when there was a question about the turnout? There have been 5 remarkably close elections, two are modern enough to be of concern.

John F. Kennedy/Richard Nixon (1960)
George W. Bush/Al Gore (2000)
James A. Garfield/Winfield Scott Hancock (1880)
Rutherford B. Hayes/Samuel J. Tilden (1876)
John Quincy Adams/Andrew Jackson (1824)

The one difference is that the losers accepted the loss.
So it was ok for the dems to told to get over it, while reps are complaining about it being a stolen. Even if you don't believe that the evdence was not seen it doesn't mean that it was ever there. How many times has the goal post been moved down the road. Which is in my opinion is happening in Arizona. The company has changed it date of completion how many times now? Even with the graduations as a event , the company still trying to find something that may not even be there.

https://www.britannica.com/list/5-remarkably-close-us-presidential-elections
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/truth-about-voter-fraud

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 02:03:04   #
Radiance3
 
zombinis wrote:
So you are saying that the observation seen at the audit area are being seen by dems only. Even if they are being seen only by one group what does it say about the other group who doesn't see that the controls that were put into place which served very well for the last several elections. Were brought up when there was a question about the turnout? There have been 5 remarkably close elections, two are modern enough to be of concern.

John F. Kennedy/Richard Nixon (1960)
George W. Bush/Al Gore (2000)
James A. Garfield/Winfield Scott Hancock (1880)
Rutherford B. Hayes/Samuel J. Tilden (1876)
John Quincy Adams/Andrew Jackson (1824)

The one difference is that the losers accepted the loss.
So it was ok for the dems to told to get over it, while reps are complaining about it being a stolen. Even if you don't believe that the evdence was not seen it doesn't mean that it was ever there. How many times has the goal post been moved down the road. Which is in my opinion is happening in Arizona. The company has changed it date of completion how many times now? Even with the graduations as a event , the company still trying to find something that may not even be there.

https://www.britannica.com/list/5-remarkably-close-us-presidential-elections
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/truth-about-voter-fraud
So you are saying that the observation seen at the... (show quote)

=============
The democrats are trying to cover-up and deny that there were no fraudulent votes. Another source of that will be the IT reports from Mike Lindell 's printed results which will be explained in detail by IT Tech how China got involved to make Biden win the election. We will see that report sometime by August 11-12.

Democrats are expert liars. Please don't be deceived. All those links you've obtained are all weapons of destructions and are not credible. Most links are made up fraudulently as well. The good and correct reports Google or any carrier erase and delete them.

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 06:42:06   #
American Vet
 
zombinis wrote:
So you are saying that the observation seen at the audit area are being seen by dems only. Even if they are being seen only by one group what does it say about the other group who doesn't see that the controls that were put into place which served very well for the last several elections. Were brought up when there was a question about the turnout? There have been 5 remarkably close elections, two are modern enough to be of concern.

John F. Kennedy/Richard Nixon (1960)
George W. Bush/Al Gore (2000)
James A. Garfield/Winfield Scott Hancock (1880)
Rutherford B. Hayes/Samuel J. Tilden (1876)
John Quincy Adams/Andrew Jackson (1824)

The one difference is that the losers accepted the loss.
So you are saying that the observation seen at the... (show quote)


Gore conceded the election after weeks of legal battles. Sort of setting a precedent?

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2021 08:16:15   #
zombinis
 
American Vet wrote:
Gore conceded the election after weeks of legal battles. Sort of setting a precedent?


Yes he did set a precedent but that is the point I have no problem when the election is close for the request of a recount. Gore did accept the outcome when the election was certified by the Electoral College. When the court decided that the case was closed it was closed.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/al-gore-concedes-presidential-election
https://www.history.com/topics/us-politics/al-gore-concedes-presidential-election-video

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 09:09:08   #
American Vet
 
zombinis wrote:
Yes he did set a precedent but that is the point I have no problem when the election is close for the request of a recount. Gore did accept the outcome when the election was certified by the Electoral College. When the court decided that the case was closed it was closed.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/al-gore-concedes-presidential-election
https://www.history.com/topics/us-politics/al-gore-concedes-presidential-election-video


So it is a matter of degrees?

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 22:27:40   #
zombinis
 
American Vet wrote:
So it is a matter of degrees?


It is a matter of accepting the results of the system we have in place. The court said that there was not enough proof that there was fraud based on the info presented. The college saw that the popular vote was for Biden so in accordance to practice he was given the votes. People may not be happy with the results , should follow the statement made while Trump was in office here on opp and around town which was "dems lost get over it."

Reply
Jul 23, 2021 23:22:02   #
zombinis
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=============
The democrats are trying to cover-up and deny that there were no fraudulent votes. Another source of that will be the IT reports from Mike Lindell 's printed results which will be explained in detail by IT Tech how China got involved to make Biden win the election. We will see that report sometime by August 11-12.

Democrats are expert liars. Please don't be deceived. All those links you've obtained are all weapons of destructions and are not credible. Most links are made up fraudulently as well. The good and correct reports Google or any carrier erase and delete them.
============= br The democrats are trying to cover... (show quote)


I am not saying that there was no fraud the thing is if the mistakes, or lack of procedure were intentional. Trying to verify the mulitple versions of conspiracies should not be primary over following accepted procedure. Also according to the report the companies own procedures are not being followed. As for video it dosen't last , paper trail does , yes you can cover the paper trail or lose it. But the same subject will always be there in print. As for lying both side are very capable at lying and also giving out misinfomation,

Example
Todd Akin, Missouri’s Republican Senate candidate, sparked controversy with a claim, made in a TV interview posted Sunday, that victims of “legitimate rape” very rarely get pregnant because their bodies prevent them from doing so.

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/08/akin-legitimate-rape-victims-dont-get-pregnant-079864

Just type in on your search engine
Statements made about rape by congress
You will get page upon page of results leading to statements made by both the dems and reps.

As for being mislead I would go for something that is not as visibly modified as the video.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2021 IDF International Technologies, Inc.