One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Parents Are Pushing Back Against Critical Race Theory
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jun 10, 2021 10:23:48   #
Radiance3
 
I am glad parents are fighting for this. All of us must oppose this tragic future of kids. CRT is destroying their children. It is most r****t and discriminatory.

CRT must have never been allowed. This is tragic to all students and other organizations and activities.

It destroys the most important value of kids their wisdom and minds that need to be developed to the fullest extent possible. Dumbing down students or kids to equal with those dumb kids is similarly decided by STUPIDS.

I discussed this CRT earlier, and how schools must improve their performance.
Leadership is very important. Those in the School Board using the CRT must be removed. They have no right to be there. Perhaps the same dumb people too.

The knowledge of kids is a gold mine that must be developed to the fullest extent possible. These are the future of our country.

The dumb kids must be given more training and tutoring to learn better. Kids vary their level of wisdom thru their DNA's. We cannot make the smart kids dumb to equal with those dumb ones.

Another tragic subject introduced in schools is the wrong history of Project 1619.
The time when s***es where bought from black s***e traders in Africa. To be honest, I think the b****s must be very thankful that they were bought from the s***e traders, and lived in the West. Cause if they were not bought, they will still be living in Africa roaming in the mountains. While here in the US, many of them became multi-billionaires, and all the opportunities are endless, similarly given to them if not more. They must be thankful instead.

Those s***es sold to the Muslims were k**led when they got old. No one complained about that. Those s***es sold in the US have equal rights, and became multi-billionaires like the w****s.

If there are b****s left behind, it is their leader who are hurting them. Check Chicago, for decades run by black leaders why are their kids k*****g each other? Another one in Baltimore. Their corrupt black leaders take the money aided to them in billions.

Another barriers are their lifestyle.77% of female b****s make so many babies with different b****s male without fathers to guide their children. and they grow up wild, violent, populating the streets 24 hours daily. Then they join the B*MS's.

Think about that. Do you blame white people for that?

============================
Charlotte Allen
June 9, 2021 Updated: June 9, 2021
Commentary

Critical race theory, or “CRT”—the idea that s******c r****m permeates American life and American institutions despite all our civil-rights advances—has moved from the academic journals where it began life three decades ago into public-school classrooms and business training programs.

Schoolchildren and corporate employees alike sit through sessions in which they learn that r****m is America’s defining feature and that our nation’s “true founding” occurred when a s***e ship bearing a cargo of black Africans docked in Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619.

And while there may be little that employees can do when their bosses sponsor “diversity” consultants who tell them that white people sail through life on a sea of “unearned privilege,” or that white oppression is the source of most social problems, there’s one group that has been resisting vociferously: parents.

Angry at what looks to them like Marxist indoctrination of their children (with racial antagonism standing in for Karl Marx’s class antagonism), parents are the grassroots force behind bills in about 15 states (signed into law in about four of them) that forbid teaching, for example, that any individual can be “inherently” or “unconsciously” r****t or sexist just because of that individual’s race or sex, or that it’s r****t to value such character traits as self-discipline and hard work.

[b]On May 14, several Republican members of Congress introduced a bill that would ban the teaching of CRT in federal institutions. But the most intense battles against CRT are being fought at the local level, in the races for local school boards that set education policy in public schools. Those battles have been taking place not just in such conservative and Republican-v****g strongholds as Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina, but in localities in true-blue New York, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington.

The affluent Washington, D.C. suburb of Loudoun County, Virginia, whose v**ers went 61 percent for Democratic p**********l candidate Joe Biden in November 2020, is a paradigm. A parents’ group is working to recall six of the county school board’s nine members for pushing CRT onto Loudoun schools.

In 2019, the board paid nearly a half-million dollars to a consulting group, the Equity Collaborative, which issued a 23-page “equity assessment” (pdf) recommending the creation of what looked like race-based “affinity groups” for students, criticized teachers who said they did not “see color” in judging students, and quoted faculty who urged that the school district explicitly hire teachers “if they are Black.” The collaborative also recommended that the district offer teacher training in “color consciousness and implicit bias.”

One Loudoun County father complained that the report “actually increases racial tensions as opposed to bringing people together and treating everyone the same and treating people the way they themselves should be treated.”

In March, a school-board advisory committee recommended firing Loudoun teachers who criticized the mandated equity training. Other self-described “anti-r****m” advocates allegedly began compiling lists of parents who oppose race-based classroom programs.

Perhaps not surprisingly, liberals and minority-group members have joined conservative Republican v**ers in fighting what they view as CRT totalitarianism in Loudoun County. On June 2, a group of parents filed a federal lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of a school-district program, implemented in the wake of the Equity Collaborative assessment, that allows students specially selected for their commitment to “social justice” to share with top school administrators anonymous complaints from their fellow students about supposed racial harassment by teachers.

The backlash has generated its own backlash among educators and sympathetic members of the press. One of the most obvious counter-strategies has been simply to deny that what the school systems are engaging in is really CRT. That has been the strategy in Loudoun County, whose school superintendent Scott A. Ziegler has described the district’s program as mere “racial equity work,” according to The Washington Post. At a school-board meeting, Ziegler said that CRT was a “subject for academics” that had no bearing on Loudoun’s anti-r****t measures. Calling them “critical race theory” is merely a paranoid fantasy of arch-conservatives, in the view of Ziegler and many other commentators and liberal politicians.

The other strategy is to assert that the opponents of CRT are actually trying either to censor the content of what teachers are allowed to say in classrooms or to make them hesitant to discuss historical topics such as s***ery or Jim Crow that relate to r****m for fear that they might break a law by making their white students feel uncomfortable. One teacher complained to the media that she would hesitate to assign the s***e narratives that she typically had her American history classes read.

Other teachers have maintained that banning the teaching of CRT means that students won’t be taught how to think critically, to examine and assess varying points of view in approaching historical events. They accuse their opponents of wanting children to absorb a rose-tinted-glasses view of history in which Americans can do no wrong.

Defenders of the anti-CRT legislation insist that the proposed laws ban teachers neither from pointing out problematic aspects of American history nor discouraging critical thinking. What they do ban is the imposition on young minds of a particular l*****t ideology.

Those opponents have a tough road ahead of them in our era in which it’s all too easy to lodge accusations of r****m or w***e s*******y against one’s political opponents—and make them stick, in the minds of the media. But those parents who are fighting the fight against CRT are doing the crucial work of defending freedom of thought.

Charlotte Allen is the executive editor of Catholic Arts Today and a frequent contributor to Quillette. She has a doctorate in medieval studies from the Catholic University of America.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the
author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 11:16:09   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
I am glad parents are fighting for this. All of us must oppose this tragic future of kids. CRT is destroying their children. It is most r****t and discriminatory.

CRT must have never been allowed. This is tragic to all students and other organizations and activities.

It destroys the most important value of kids their wisdom and minds that need to be developed to the fullest extent possible. Dumbing down students or kids to equal with those dumb kids is similarly decided by STUPIDS.

I discussed this CRT earlier, and how schools must improve their performance.
Leadership is very important. Those in the School Board using the CRT must be removed. They have no right to be there. Perhaps the same dumb people too.

The knowledge of kids is a gold mine that must be developed to the fullest extent possible. These are the future of our country.

The dumb kids must be given more training and tutoring to learn better. Kids vary their level of wisdom thru their DNA's. We cannot make the smart kids dumb to equal with those dumb ones.

Another tragic subject introduced in schools is the wrong history of Project 1619.
The time when s***es where bought from black s***e traders in Africa. To be honest, I think the b****s must be very thankful that they were bought from the s***e traders, and lived in the West. Cause if they were not bought, they will still be living in Africa roaming in the mountains. While here in the US, many of them became multi-billionaires, and all the opportunities are endless, similarly given to them if not more. They must be thankful instead.

Those s***es sold to the Muslims were k**led when they got old. No one complained about that. Those s***es sold in the US have equal rights, and became multi-billionaires like the w****s.

If there are b****s left behind, it is their leader who are hurting them. Check Chicago, for decades run by black leaders why are their kids k*****g each other? Another one in Baltimore. Their corrupt black leaders take the money aided to them in billions.

Another barriers are their lifestyle.77% of female b****s make so many babies with different b****s male without fathers to guide their children. and they grow up wild, violent, populating the streets 24 hours daily. Then they join the B*MS's.

Think about that. Do you blame white people for that?

============================
Charlotte Allen
June 9, 2021 Updated: June 9, 2021
Commentary
Critical race theory, or “CRT”—the idea that s******c r****m permeates American life and American institutions despite all our civil-rights advances—has moved from the academic journals where it began life three decades ago into public-school classrooms and business training programs.

Schoolchildren and corporate employees alike sit through sessions in which they learn that r****m is America’s defining feature and that our nation’s “true founding” occurred when a s***e ship bearing a cargo of black Africans docked in Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619.

And while there may be little that employees can do when their bosses sponsor “diversity” consultants who tell them that white people sail through life on a sea of “unearned privilege,” or that white oppression is the source of most social problems, there’s one group that has been resisting vociferously: parents.

Angry at what looks to them like Marxist indoctrination of their children (with racial antagonism standing in for Karl Marx’s class antagonism), parents are the grassroots force behind bills in about 15 states (signed into law in about four of them) that forbid teaching, for example, that any individual can be “inherently” or “unconsciously” r****t or sexist just because of that individual’s race or sex, or that it’s r****t to value such character traits as self-discipline and hard work.

On May 14, several Republican members of Congress introduced a bill that would ban the teaching of CRT in federal institutions. But the most intense battles against CRT are being fought at the local level, in the races for local school boards that set education policy in public schools. Those battles have been taking place not just in such conservative and Republican-v****g strongholds as Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina, but in localities in true-blue New York, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington.

The affluent Washington, D.C. suburb of Loudoun County, Virginia, whose v**ers went 61 percent for Democratic p**********l candidate Joe Biden in November 2020, is a paradigm. A parents’ group is working to recall six of the county school board’s nine members for pushing CRT onto Loudoun schools.

In 2019, the board paid nearly a half-million dollars to a consulting group, the Equity Collaborative, which issued a 23-page “equity assessment” (pdf) recommending the creation of what looked like race-based “affinity groups” for students, criticized teachers who said they did not “see color” in judging students, and quoted faculty who urged that the school district explicitly hire teachers “if they are Black.” The collaborative also recommended that the district offer teacher training in “color consciousness and implicit bias.”

One Loudoun County father complained that the report “actually increases racial tensions as opposed to bringing people together and treating everyone the same and treating people the way they themselves should be treated.”

In March, a school-board advisory committee recommended firing Loudoun teachers who criticized the mandated equity training. Other self-described “anti-r****m” advocates allegedly began compiling lists of parents who oppose race-based classroom programs.

Perhaps not surprisingly, liberals and minority-group members have joined conservative Republican v**ers in fighting what they view as CRT totalitarianism in Loudoun County. On June 2, a group of parents filed a federal lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of a school-district program, implemented in the wake of the Equity Collaborative assessment, that allows students specially selected for their commitment to “social justice” to share with top school administrators anonymous complaints from their fellow students about supposed racial harassment by teachers.

The backlash has generated its own backlash among educators and sympathetic members of the press. One of the most obvious counter-strategies has been simply to deny that what the school systems are engaging in is really CRT. That has been the strategy in Loudoun County, whose school superintendent Scott A. Ziegler has described the district’s program as mere “racial equity work,” according to The Washington Post. At a school-board meeting, Ziegler said that CRT was a “subject for academics” that had no bearing on Loudoun’s anti-r****t measures. Calling them “critical race theory” is merely a paranoid fantasy of arch-conservatives, in the view of Ziegler and many other commentators and liberal politicians.

The other strategy is to assert that the opponents of CRT are actually trying either to censor the content of what teachers are allowed to say in classrooms or to make them hesitant to discuss historical topics such as s***ery or Jim Crow that relate to r****m for fear that they might break a law by making their white students feel uncomfortable. One teacher complained to the media that she would hesitate to assign the s***e narratives that she typically had her American history classes read.

Other teachers have maintained that banning the teaching of CRT means that students won’t be taught how to think critically, to examine and assess varying points of view in approaching historical events. They accuse their opponents of wanting children to absorb a rose-tinted-glasses view of history in which Americans can do no wrong.

Defenders of the anti-CRT legislation insist that the proposed laws ban teachers neither from pointing out problematic aspects of American history nor discouraging critical thinking. What they do ban is the imposition on young minds of a particular l*****t ideology.

Those opponents have a tough road ahead of them in our era in which it’s all too easy to lodge accusations of r****m or w***e s*******y against one’s political opponents—and make them stick, in the minds of the media. But those parents who are fighting the fight against CRT are doing the crucial work of defending freedom of thought.

Charlotte Allen is the executive editor of Catholic Arts Today and a frequent contributor to Quillette. She has a doctorate in medieval studies from the Catholic University of America.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the
author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
I am glad parents are fighting for this. All of us... (show quote)

Most Americans didn't know anything about the 1921 burning of Greenwood/Tulsa and the murder of over 300 Black people by white mobs. And Americans certainly don't know about similar acts which happened frequently since 1870. All of that has been hushed up, and it's time Americans knew the full extent of racial atrocities which have never made the history books for obvious reasons.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 11:36:18   #
Radiance3
 
kemmer wrote:
Most Americans didn't know anything about the 1921 burning of Greenwood/Tulsa and the murder of over 300 Black people by white mobs. And Americans certainly don't know about similar acts which happened frequently since 1870. All of that has been hushed up, and it's time Americans knew the full extent of racial atrocities which have never made the history books for obvious reasons.

=================
If ever those things existed there must be reasons. Granting that there was, so much have been corrected and alleviated to right the wrongs.

But now, vengeance never cease where violence live forever. Barack Obama was elected by most white people. That means that there was no discrimination that exist among the white people.

Unless you revive violence and vengeance which never cease to end. Even the brown people are k**led and knocked down. What does that tell you? They are filled with hatred to those worked hard and excel.

They even k**l their own, naturally violent and filled with hatred. Those must not be part of our civilization.

Our country must unify and care for each other. But forever hatred and violence destroy that. When is that going to end?

Reply
 
 
Jun 10, 2021 11:43:32   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===
Barack Obama was elected by most white people.

There are more white people than Black people. Duh.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 11:48:34   #
Radiance3
 
kemmer wrote:
There are more white people than Black people. Duh.


================
Of course. S***es were brought here by the w****s. Do you expect more s***es brought here from Africa? Besides, the b****s k**l each other. E.g. Chicago. Then they k**l innocent people on the streets. Are they naturally violent people?

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 12:00:17   #
American Vet
 
kemmer wrote:
Most Americans didn't know anything about the 1921 burning of Greenwood/Tulsa and the murder of over 300 Black people by white mobs. And Americans certainly don't know about similar acts which happened frequently since 1870. All of that has been hushed up, and it's time Americans knew the full extent of racial atrocities which have never made the history books for obvious reasons.


Agreed. History - both good and bad - needs to be taught.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 12:28:54   #
Radiance3
 
American Vet wrote:
Agreed. History - both good and bad - needs to be taught.


=================
The good had surpassed the bad. That is why most of them had equally succeeded except those on the wrong hands. Their own people and their ways of life style negated all the positives provided to them. E.g. greed, low morals, violence towards their own, and others. E.g. Chicago, B*M's. Are you proud of that?

Reply
 
 
Jun 10, 2021 13:08:53   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
============= Besides, the b****s k**l each other.

More w****s k**l w****s than b****s k**l b****s.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 13:13:17   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=======
Their own people and their ways of life style negated all the positives provided to them. E.g. greed, low morals, violence towards their own, and others.

So all b****s are greedy, immoral, and violent, huh?
You’re such a sweet thing.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 15:38:33   #
Radiance3
 
kemmer wrote:
So all b****s are greedy, immoral, and violent, huh?
You’re such a sweet thing.


==================
You are the one who said ALL. I did not say that. I like some b****s like
Rev. Martin Luther King. Senator Scott. Leo Terell of Fox News, and many other conservatives.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 18:08:00   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
You are the one who said ALL. I did not say that. I like some b****s like
Rev. Martin Luther King. Senator Scott. Leo Terell of Fox News, and many other conservatives.

But all the rest can go hang as far as you’re concerned, right dear?

Reply
 
 
Jun 10, 2021 18:10:47   #
Radiance3
 
kemmer wrote:
More w****s k**l w****s than b****s k**l b****s.


================
How awful statement you've got there. Out from my site.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 19:49:53   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
How awful statement you've got there. Out from my site.

You’re blathering again, sweets.

Reply
Jun 10, 2021 21:18:46   #
Radiance3
 
kemmer wrote:
But all the rest can go hang as far as you’re concerned, right dear?


==================
That is your problem. I have no control of that. You are the one who suggested it.

Reply
Jun 11, 2021 11:09:43   #
kemmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
That is your problem. I have no control of that. You are the one who suggested it.

But you said b****s are greedy, immoral, and violent and don't appreciate all the nice things w****s have given them.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.