JW

There are two possibilities running through three paths:

Possibility 1 – The status quo will be retained.

Path 1 – the e******n will be found fair and honest and the status quo will be maintained.
Path 2 - the e******n will be found flawed but the status quo will be maintained.

Possibility 2 – The e******n will be voided.

Path 3 – the e******n will be found to be massively flawed with numerous examples of outright fraud.

Per instructions left to a special operations cadre by former President Trump through his 2018 executive order 13848 of September 12, 2018,. That order is entitled, “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States E******n.”
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13848-imposing-certain-sanctions-the-event-foreign-interference-united

That executive order authorizes various government officials to seize all assets of any nation or domestic group or corporation operating within US jurisdiction. That includes all Chinese holdings in the US as well as those of any other nation doing business or having property within any US jurisdiction. The power to issue such an executive order is granted by the P**********l Powers Act.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1702

If there is adequate proof of foreign or domestic interference with the e******n and that has already been shown, the Biden administration will be required to act on President Trump’s order. If the Biden administration fails to follow the instructions as prescribed in E.O. 13848, it will signal a failure of the American civil authority which will automatically trigger martial law.

If there is adequate proof of fraud in the e******n, the current government will be declared voided and martial law will be established. Martial law will continue until a legitimate and viable civil government is restored.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/10/23/how-the-president-could-invoke-martial-law/



Bottom line: It is most likely that path 3 will be our experience in the next few months.

PeterS

If there had been adequate proof of fraud the courts would have found that to be the case and we wouldn't be talking about it now. That they didn't buy the garbage that you put before them then doesn't mean that you can sell the same spoiled fruit as "suddenly ripe" now. You are dreaming if you think there will be a military takeover of this country. It ain't going to happen and if you try anything we will simply see a repeat of what happened in January, with the military taking control.

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

PeterS, if you were truly honest to yourself, you would know that none of the courts actually looked into any of the allegations of fraud. The various courts to include SCOTUS refused to even look at any type of evidence due to in their words lack of standing. Which means that the various courts were to afraid to take on the issue of potential v***r f***d on a massive scale.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

He won't listen. This has been discussed and confirmed repeatedly. The left continues with the deliberate lie that the evidence has been proven fraudulent, when it has never been examined at all.

Smedley_buzkill

There are limits on Martial law. In Ex parte Milligan 1866 the SCOTUS ruled that Martial law may only be imposed when civilian courts and government can no longer function, and may only be imposed on the area[s] affected and only for as long as it takes for civil authority to be restored. I do not see it being imposed just yet, particularly with the Senile Sock Puppet and the Happy Hooker in the White House and Naval Observatory.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

It has already been resolved, it happened on jan 20th.

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Your path 3 would not happen. Simply, if Biden and Harris were removed, Nancy would become interim President until such time as the house appoints a president and the senate appoints a VP. Under the prescribed process the house would likely appoint a republican, not necessarily Trump, and the senate appointment would be up for grabs with the senate at 50/50.

Possibility 1 is the most likely in my opinion. Status quo will be maintained regardless of investigation outcomes.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

It is not what I would choose to happen, but I agree with your analysis.

PeterS

"Standing," asks the question of whether the plaintiff has a right to sue. When Texas sued Pennsylvania over changes to their v**er laws Texas had a "lack of standing" to do so. That's because each state has rights over its v**er laws and one state can't claim harm from another. But most of the cases were throwout for lack of evidence.

Snip>>On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, f**r e******ns are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an e******n unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

Without evidence, there is no case, which is why they were thrown out. The courts weren't afraid of anything except adding to the conspiracy theories being spun by Trump. Trump had Rudy for that. He didn't need the court system to jump into the fray...

Homestead

The courts didn't find anything.
They refused to hear the cases, preventing any evidence from being brought forward.

First it was, It's too early, the e******n is not over yet.

Then it was, you should have filed sooner, because the e******n is over now.

Then it was a declaration, that the e******n was absolutely fair, so we can't hear the case, because it would overturn the e******n.

Which begs the question, if they absolutely knew the e******n was fair, (without examining it) what then made them think that by examining the e******n that it would then be overturned? What are they afraid of?

Then there was the courts catch all excuse, lack of standing.

As if a United States citizen or an individual running for office, doesn't have the right to know if their e******n was fair.

Especially since we have all kinds of laws and protocols preserving records and b****ts, for the sole purpose of auditing e******ns to make sure they were honest and fair.

That fact alone is supposed to discourage any wrong doing, because the bad guys are supposed to know that if they c***t, they will be caught.

But, I guess that's an old fashion stupid idea.

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

The few weeks allotted to do an investigation is not enough time to gather definitive proof. There is plenty of specific allegations but only statistical and circumstantial proof. If the investigations are allowed to continue, which democrats consistently oppose, then more proof may or may not surface. The question is why do democrats so vehemently oppose a search for the t***h on blatantly flimsy excuses, regardless of which way the wind blows. Shouldn't they want thorough investigations to reinforce their contention that the e******n was free and fair? Are they afraid of what the t***h might reveal?

I really don't care what the final results of any investigations show as long as they reveal the t***h and restore confidence in free and f**r e******ns. As every American should.

Homestead

They had proof.
Sworn affidavits under oath, is evidence.
A security camera that verified the eye witnesses claims, is proof.

That is why the courts and the Democrat Party does not want an investigation.

JW

[quote=Smedley_buzk**l]There are limits on Martial law. In Ex parte Milligan 1866 the SCOTUS ruled that Martial law may only be imposed when civilian courts and government can no longer function, and may only be imposed on the area[s] affected and only for as long as it takes for civil authority to be restored. I do not see it being imposed just yet, particularly with the Senile Sock Puppet and the Happy Hooker in the White House and Naval Observatory.[/quote]

You are correct and one of my links explains the conditions required for martial law to be imposed. An illegitimate and/or nonfunctional government is on its way as we speak.

PeterS

What a crock of BS.

“Free, f**r e******ns are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an e******n unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

You can't make that statement if you hadn't looked at the evidence...er, I should say accusations which is about as close to evidence that poor Rudy ever got.

JW

If Nancy is seen as part of the cabal that installed a bogus administration, and she is part of it, she won't fill anything but a cell at Gitmo. The corruption in our government(s) is deep and wide. The military is the only thing that can clean up the mess we have allowed to happen.