AmericanEagle wrote:
Sorry but this narrative of making it harder for black people to v**e is just a joke.
Is the joke as funny as you not being able to understand the narrative?
AmericanEagle wrote:
Why don’t you own up to it because what you really mean as you think black people are too stupid to be able to get a photo ID!
Getting a photo ID isn't the problem... Black people are apparently smart enough to realize that.
AmericanEagle wrote:
Do these people just set in their houses and never leave? You can’t go through life without proper ID. Have they not ever been to a pharmacy? Have they ever not trying to return something? Would you be able to get into the White House for a tour if there ever was one again? Do these people not have a bank account?
Try listening to yourself... It's pretty funny. Basically, you're listing off all these examples of how these people use photo ID's in everyday life, then your asking why these people can't get a photo ID. LOL
AmericanEagle wrote:
So you can see how ridiculous this r****t bulls**t is but have a new show an ID to v**e is r****t!
I'm not sure that you know what "r****t" means.
AmericanEagle wrote:
It is one of the most important things we have to protect the integrity of but last time the Democrats r****d the e******n using C***d as an excuse for mail in b****ting.
Mail in b****ting has been used for over a hundred years, Sparky.
AmericanEagle wrote:
There were over 1000 sworn affidavit from poll workers across from all 50 states.
LOL, that number keeps going up every time I hear the claim. If you folks can keep your stories straight they might be more believable, just saying.
Ronna McDaniel, Chair of the Republican National Committee (RNC) reported the count at 500. So I guess one of you Republicans is lying. Those 500 affidavits however report 11,000 v***r f***d incidents (according to McDaniel).
Here's the thing… Trump was down by 7,052,770 v**es. So what kind of mullet-minded math is going to say 11,000 disqualified v**es is going to overturn a deficit 640 times bigger?
So I don't even have to go into any details about the fraudulence involved in the affidavits themselves to say that it doesn't even matter. Trump lost. Move on.
AmericanEagle wrote:
The penalty under law is a fine, imprisonment or both for making false claims.
Legal experts have stated that the jeopardy faced by those making false claims on these affidavits is relatively minimal. First of all, for this law to apply, an affidavit would have to be signed in court and most of those affidavits filed by the Trump team were not. Secondly, the claims being made are very difficult to prove one way or the other and even more difficult is whether or not the claimant KNEW he/she was claiming a falsehood, which is a prerequisite to any punishment.
Also, a fair number of claims turned out to be honest mistakes, like the Texas security consultant who mistook data from Minnesota to be from Michigan. In these cases the claim could be understood as an honest mistake or resulting from a lack of expertise in the subject matter — rather than an outright lie. He was therefore not punished. But again, none of this matters to the 2020 e******n results because 11,000 invalidated v**es STILL isn't enough to compensate for a 7 million v**e deficit.
AmericanEagle wrote:
Funny how the Democrats so you have to believe the whistle blower which they only had one.
Is that really a sentence?
AmericanEagle wrote:
Once again laws don’t apply to liberals
Do you really believe that?
AmericanEagle wrote:
and 1000 people are not believable?
There's more than 1000 people insisting that the Earth is flat. So you tell me.
AmericanEagle wrote:
You say we should except the e******n results Because it is over.
No, I'm saying accept the e******n results because 11,000 invalidated v**es STILL isn't enough to compensate for a 7 million v**e deficit.
AmericanEagle wrote:
Applying your same logic if a person is k**led it’s like saying we should not investigate because they are already dead!
Sorry just using your loony logic against you so maybe the light bulb comes on for you!
The problem is… that isn't my logic. You are assuming that I am saying we should stop the investigations and I never said that. Also it's a really bad analogy because murder investigations don't determine if the murder victim is dead. That's why it doesn't matter if he is. The focus is on the cause not the effect.
You are trying to compare that with these investigations that are ultimately trying to change the effect (e******n results). That's like proving that the murder victim isn't really dead.
AmericanEagle wrote:
If the Democrats succeed in nationalizing e******ns taking the power away from the states, Republicans will never see the house for Senate majority again let alone the White House.
That all depends on the Republicans. They need to convince more people that they present better options. Right now they're only able to convince a less-educated demographic in rural parts of the country and they can get away with it because our system broke in 1910 when the House of Representatives stopped adding seats to match the growing population.
I'll illustrate the problem…
Year 1: (fair)
District 1: 10 people + 1 representative
District 2: 10 people + 1 representative
Year 2: (not so fair)
District 1: 10 people + 1 representative
District 2: 20 people + 1 representative
Year 3: (District 2 is screwed!)
District 1: 12 people + 1 representative
District 2: 60 people + 1 representative
So what you are saying is precisely this…. You don't WANT the system to be fair because your side can't win in a fair fight. Think about it.
AmericanEagle wrote:
Why do you think they are keeping a fence in the military around them to protect them? Talk about living under a dictatorship under a feckless weakling dementia ill********e p*******t🤮👎🏻
The security is there because YOU folks violently mobbed the Capitol a few months ago, you don't remember that?
AmericanEagle wrote:
They are paying people the C***d bonus on top of unemployment to stay at home that are destroying the same break of small businesses across the country. Look how they Are destroying America in such a short time with their destructors policies.
Paying people to stay at home sounds like a great idea to me. It helps prevent the spread of the v***s without forcing them into starvation. I really don't see what your problem is here. Yes, this is causing the weaker businesses to fold, but the stronger ones are thriving. Look how well Amazon is doing. Wh**ever happened to American determination and ingenuity? When did we become a nation of whiners that can't deal with a p******c?
AmericanEagle wrote:
Can you name one successfully run democratic city that is not in the red and has a low crime rate?
Oh… well, THAT's not out of the blue - lol. Are we moving on to wh**ever insults you can throw at the liberals now?
Fine… Irvine, CA.
Run by a Democrats, Irvine is currently ranked #2 in the top 10 cities in the US with the lowest crime rates AND it's solvent. There. Are you surprised? Was that not supposed to happen?
Look, I know it's a popular claim among Republicans these days, that Democrats can't manage cities or control crime and ever since some "genius" realized that almost all the major cities with crime issues are run by Democrats, conservatives have been carrying that klunker around like it's a hand grenade. But what they fail to realize is that potential crime rates increase with the size of the population anyway. That means that major cities will always have a higher potential for crime. It just so happens that almost ALL the major cities are run by Democrats, mostly because no one believes Republicans can handle it.
So what are we comparing here? LAPD dealing with Bloods, Crips and Russian mafia versus the Mayberry Sherriff dealing with the town drunk?
Get real. Tell Tucker Carlson to come up with a better grenade.LOL
AmericanEagle wrote:
Our freedoms are eroding quickly and the d******c t*******t organization known as B*M has hijacked a movement and creating a potential for a Civil War.
LOL - I *LOVE* this one. First of all B*M hasn't hijacked anything. They ARE the movement and they've been really successful in using peaceful and legal means to push for reform. In fact, they've become a model for similar movements around the world.
I know this creates a LOT of resentment on the right sometimes leading to angry threats of civil war, which is just absurd. All that talk of civil war is coming from the same type of people that mobbed the Capitol and that event revealed a LOT about what they are capable of, like getting arrested and making utter fools of themselves. Here's the score card bro…
B*M + peaceful protests = negotiations for reform.
Pudd Boys + r**ts = total failure and jail time.
Civil war? Don't make laugh.
AmericanEagle wrote:
This r********ns bulls**t is reprehensible and if you want to live in the past our future is looking bleak. Do you want to tear down statues and erase history.
I'm not a fan of r********n. I just think we should recognize historical t***sgressions and do our best to avoid them in the future.
As for the statues… personally, I don't care. I'm not into symbolism and all that crap. I guess I'm inclined to say we should leave them standing because they are works of art and for some people they have historical meaning. For those that find them offensive I think they should get over it. It's a piece of stone.
AmericanEagle wrote:
So by applying your liberal logic s***ery never happened so there is no need for r********ns right!
I don't know what "liberal logic" has to do with it, but I'm pretty sure s***ery DID happen - but I don't know why that would mean we need to offer r********n. I guess I don't understand your "logic" there.
AmericanEagle wrote:
My great great grandfather was hung up by the thumbs during the Civil War for helping s***es so where is my r********ns?
Why would you get r********n for something that happened to your grandfather?
AmericanEagle wrote:
Face it America’s history has it always been pretty but we learn from it, try to make things better and move on.
Well, we try anyway.
AmericanEagle wrote:
That’s why we were the greatest country on the planet.
Ugh… what’s with the ridiculous obsession with needing to be the "greatest" country on the planet? Are you saying that no other people try to learn from their past? Think again. Why don't we just focus on being a decent country. Let's focus on making it better than it was. We don't NEEED to be #1 all the time.
AmericanEagle wrote:
China and Russia are laughing at us because they don’t even have to fire a single shot. We are destroying ourselves from within with all of the civil unrest and China and other countries will eat our lunch if this continues!
Well, we agree there.
AmericanEagle wrote:
Wake up and let’s work together as Americans and v**e out these i***ts and their destructive policies before it’s too late. 2022 is literally our next to last chance if we survive🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Well… working together as Americans sounds great but in the same breath you are suggesting an attack on Americans, so that's kind of confusing - LOL. I mean how do you think those "i***ts" got to office in the first place? They were elected by Americans and you think v****g them out qualifies as working WITH those Americans?
I'm not sure what you are calling destructive policies either but I know that's what a lot of conservatives call progressive policies and I don't think they're all that destructive. The policies I find most destructive are coming from the right, such as the 2017 tax cut that added a huge deficit to our budget, just to name one.
So, this was a long post... this is what happens when you rant and wind up giving me so much to respond to.