Moldyoldy says nothing in the following is true. Which part??
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the e*******l v**es needed. She lost fair and square unless there was some e******n f***d that we haven't looked into yet. She came up with a thousand reasons for losing but just couldn't accept the fact that nobody likes her. She's been over exposed.
We DO NOT think that A****A attacked the capital building but we have footage of an A****A leader inciting people to go in. What we DO have also is exhaustive evidence and film of A****A r**ting, l**ting, burning and k*****g people/attacking the police, taking over entire segments of a city, and taking over federal buildings in a state or two.
The my pillow guy might have something, who knows, until his lawsuit with D******n comes to discovery and trial. Should be interesting. Hint: D******n will drop it.
And how could you know if Fox is hiding from anything. Don't you claim to never watch it or read it?
nwtk2007 wrote:
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the e*******l v**es needed. She lost fair and square unless there was some e******n f***d that we haven't looked into yet. She came up with a thousand reasons for losing but just couldn't accept the fact that nobody likes her. She's been over exposed.
We DO NOT think that A****A attacked the capital building but we have footage of an A****A leader inciting people to go in. What we DO have also is exhaustive evidence and film of A****A r**ting, l**ting, burning and k*****g people/attacking the police, taking over entire segments of a city, and taking over federal buildings in a state or two.
The my pillow guy might have something, who knows, until his lawsuit with D******n comes to discovery and trial. Should be interesting. Hint: D******n will drop it.
And how could you know if Fox is hiding from anything. Don't you claim to never watch it or read it?
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the ... (
show quote)
Every time they say it was A****a they find
M*****a Colors under their shirts.
Do they have pics if actual a****a ?
nwtk2007 wrote:
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the e*******l v**es needed. She lost fair and square unless there was some e******n f***d that we haven't looked into yet. She came up with a thousand reasons for losing but just couldn't accept the fact that nobody likes her. She's been over exposed.
We DO NOT think that A****A attacked the capital building but we have footage of an A****A leader inciting people to go in. What we DO have also is exhaustive evidence and film of A****A r**ting, l**ting, burning and k*****g people/attacking the police, taking over entire segments of a city, and taking over federal buildings in a state or two.
The my pillow guy might have something, who knows, until his lawsuit with D******n comes to discovery and trial. Should be interesting. Hint: D******n will drop it.
And how could you know if Fox is hiding from anything. Don't you claim to never watch it or read it?
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the ... (
show quote)
1)Hillary won the popular v**e and lost the e*******l college therefore the presidency.
2)Liking her is irrelevant, her job was to be president not our drinking buddies.
3)What footage you have of A****A attacking the Capitol--I could care less. The mob wouldn't have been in Washington save for the fact that Trump called them there nor would there have been an attack on the Capitol if that wasn't what Trump wanted them to do. If you want to blame A****A you go right ahead but your refusal to accept the wrong that you do is becoming the greatest trademark of you and the Republican party...that and blaming your wrongs on somebody else...all so you can h**e them more intensely than before. Such is the irony that is a Republican...
PeterS wrote:
1)Hillary won the popular v**e and lost the e*******l college therefore the presidency.
2)Liking her is irrelevant, her job was to be president not our drinking buddies.
3)What footage you have of A****A attacking the Capitol--I could care less. The mob wouldn't have been in Washington save for the fact that Trump called them there nor would there have been an attack on the Capitol if that wasn't what Trump wanted them to do. If you want to blame A****A you go right ahead but your refusal to accept the wrong that you do is becoming the greatest trademark of you and the Republican party...that and blaming your wrongs on somebody else...all so you can h**e them more intensely than before. Such is the irony that is a Republican...
1)Hillary won the popular v**e and lost the e*****... (
show quote)
1) I said that.
2) That applies to Trump as well.
3) You've seen it, I'm sure so why claim it didn't happen?
4) Ignore the rest of my post, why don't you!
Milosia2 wrote:
Every time they say it was A****a they find
M*****a Colors under their shirts.
Do they have pics if actual a****a ?
It seems A****A went from pimply-faced college students to pot-bellied m*****a types guided by the craziness of Q. No matter, believe anything to keep from accepting responsibility for what you've become...
nwtk2007 wrote:
1) I said that.
2) That applies to Trump as well.
3) You've seen it, I'm sure so why claim it didn't happen?
4) Ignore the rest of my post, why don't you!
1&2) You implied that Hillary lost because she wasn't popular which wasn't true...she had 4 million more v**es than Trump so if being president was a popularity contest she would have been president, not "The Donald." Remember, you wanted us to point out what you said that wasn't true which is what I did.
3) You're the one claiming that it didn't happen. If you want to claim that that was A****A and not right-wingers you are welcome to make that claim but like Trump's claims of e******n f***d the t***h doesn't bear you out. PBS Frontline this Tuesday is going to be on Right-wing m*****a, including a segment on the i**********n at the Capitol. You should watch it if you want to know who was responsible for attacking our Capitol. Oh wait, you can't watch it because you can't believe anything that's not vetted by right-wing media.
4) We have free speech but are governed by the rule of law so you are welcome to say any lie you want and believe any lie that you want but if you publically include private individuals or companies in your lie they have a right to sue you for damages...which in this case runs into the billions. My prediction that D******n will have a pillow plant and a news organization when this is all done. Does that answer all of your posts?
nwtk2007 wrote:
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the e*******l v**es needed. She lost fair and square unless there was some e******n f***d that we haven't looked into yet. She came up with a thousand reasons for losing but just couldn't accept the fact that nobody likes her. She's been over exposed.
We DO NOT think that A****A attacked the capital building but we have footage of an A****A leader inciting people to go in. What we DO have also is exhaustive evidence and film of A****A r**ting, l**ting, burning and k*****g people/attacking the police, taking over entire segments of a city, and taking over federal buildings in a state or two.
The my pillow guy might have something, who knows, until his lawsuit with D******n comes to discovery and trial. Should be interesting. Hint: D******n will drop it.
And how could you know if Fox is hiding from anything. Don't you claim to never watch it or read it?
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the ... (
show quote)
Your "i***t bait" has sure started a feeding frenzy.
nwtk2007 wrote:
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the e*******l v**es needed. She lost fair and square unless there was some e******n f***d that we haven't looked into yet. She came up with a thousand reasons for losing but just couldn't accept the fact that nobody likes her. She's been over exposed.
We DO NOT think that A****A attacked the capital building but we have footage of an A****A leader inciting people to go in. What we DO have also is exhaustive evidence and film of A****A r**ting, l**ting, burning and k*****g people/attacking the police, taking over entire segments of a city, and taking over federal buildings in a state or two.
The my pillow guy might have something, who knows, until his lawsuit with D******n comes to discovery and trial. Should be interesting. Hint: D******n will drop it.
And how could you know if Fox is hiding from anything. Don't you claim to never watch it or read it?
JHillary had more v**es on the coasts but not the ... (
show quote)
Moldyoldy does what the media does - minimizes the hundreds of r**ts in 2020 and magnifies the J****** 6, 2021 r**t. There were major r**ts in 12 cities during 2020 where people were k**led and seriously injured, burning of businesses, homes and l**ting all throughout the cities: Minneapolis, MD; New York, NY; Rochester, NY; Portland, OR; Chicago, IL; Kenosha, WI; Philadelphia, PA; Seattle, WA; Sacramento, CA; Richmond, VA, Dallas, TX and Denver, CO.
There were
36 other states that had r**ts that were not headline news, but where there were serious injuries, burning, l**ting and other crimes.
The r**t on J****** 6, as you point out, has a lot of questions about how it started, and how it was organized, with footage of A****a and suspicious activity of the Capitol Hill police inviting r****rs into the buildings. But all the left (and their media puppets) can talk about, is J****** 6....the r**ts of 2020 just fade into the distance....sort of like Hillary's crimes with her 30,000 emails and B******i murders.
EmilyD wrote:
Moldyoldy does what the media does - minimizes the hundreds of r**ts in 2020 and magnifies the J****** 6, 2021 r**t. There were major r**ts in 12 cities during 2020 where people were k**led and seriously injured, burning of businesses, homes and l**ting all throughout the cities: Minneapolis, MD; New York, NY; Rochester, NY; Portland, OR; Chicago, IL; Kenosha, WI; Philadelphia, PA; Seattle, WA; Sacramento, CA; Richmond, VA, Dallas, TX and Denver, CO.
There were 36 other states that had r**ts that were not headline news, but where there were serious injuries, burning, l**ting and other crimes.
The r**t on J****** 6, as you point out, has a lot of questions about how it started, and how it was organized, with footage of A****a and suspicious activity of the Capitol Hill police inviting r****rs into the buildings. But all the left (and their media puppets) can talk about, is J****** 6....the r**ts of 2020 just fade into the distance....sort of like Hillary's crimes with her 30,000 emails and B******i murders.
Moldyoldy does what the media does - minimizes the... (
show quote)
And just how can you magnify an i**********n at our Capitol? The last time that happened was...well, never, so sorry if you think the media is overstating it...
PeterS wrote:
And just how can you magnify an i**********n at our Capitol? The last time that happened was...well, never, so sorry if you think the media is overstating it...
So from what you are saying, I can conclude that you think the one attack at the Capitol on J****** 6 was so terrible, that it overrides over 200 r**ts and at least
25 deaths that occurred during the summer of 2020 alone? Really??
And J****** 6 was NOT the only time the Capitol was attacked. (BTW, Today we have a thing called "the internet" where things can easily be looked up. Maybe you should get someone to help you do some research before you make a fool of yourself):
4 historic attacks at the U.S. Capitolhttps://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-capitol-attack-history-1.5863856https://www.history.com/news/us-capitol-building-violence-fires
EmilyD wrote:
Moldyoldy does what the media does - minimizes the hundreds of r**ts in 2020 and magnifies the J****** 6, 2021 r**t. There were major r**ts in 12 cities during 2020 where people were k**led and seriously injured, burning of businesses, homes and l**ting all throughout the cities: Minneapolis, MD; New York, NY; Rochester, NY; Portland, OR; Chicago, IL; Kenosha, WI; Philadelphia, PA; Seattle, WA; Sacramento, CA; Richmond, VA, Dallas, TX and Denver, CO.
There were 36 other states that had r**ts that were not headline news, but where there were serious injuries, burning, l**ting and other crimes.
The r**t on J****** 6, as you point out, has a lot of questions about how it started, and how it was organized, with footage of A****a and suspicious activity of the Capitol Hill police inviting r****rs into the buildings. But all the left (and their media puppets) can talk about, is J****** 6....the r**ts of 2020 just fade into the distance....sort of like Hillary's crimes with her 30,000 emails and B******i murders.
Moldyoldy does what the media does - minimizes the... (
show quote)
Thanks for your comment. It accurately points out how the l*****t cherry pick and expand, ignoring the huge impact of their own "i**********ns."
I cracks me up that no one brought a gun to the attempted take over of our government but the left still calls it an i**********n. Pure politics to sway the ignorant.
PeterS wrote:
And just how can you magnify an i**********n at our Capitol? The last time that happened was...well, never, so sorry if you think the media is overstating it...
When the "attackers" came without their guns, do you truly think they were trying to take over the government, or does it make more sense that a few routies went tooo far in there attempts to be heard, regarding e******n f***d? You're essentially claiming they tried to take over the country via strong language and poor taste in clothing/attire.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.