One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
We still don’t know the origins of the c****av***s.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 7, 2021 16:14:05   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/we-still-dont-know-the-origins-of-the-c****av***s-here-are-four-scenarios?cmpid=org=ngp::mc=crm-email::src=ngp::cmp=editorial::add=Science_20210407&rid=%24%7BProfile.CustomerKey%7D

We still don’t know the origins of the c****av***s. Here are 4 scenarios.
Experts say that understanding how the v***s first leapt from animals to humans is essential to preventing future p******cs.

BYAMY MCKEEVER
PUBLISHED APRIL 2, 2021
• 12 MIN READ

The search continues for the origins of the v***s that causes C****-**—and the pathway that it took to leap from animals to humans, wreaking havoc across the globe, infecting more than 129 million people, and k*****g more than 2.8 million.

Earlier this week, the World Health Organization released a report from a team of international researchers that traveled to China to investigate four possible scenarios in which the SARS-CoV-2 v***s might have caused the initial outbreak. In the days since, however, world governments have expressed concern that the investigators lacked access to complete data, while scientists say that the report has shed little light on how the v***s got jumpstarted.

That’s unsurprising given that it typically takes years to trace a v***s back to its roots—if it’s possible at all, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University Medical Center. But in this case, she says, “I think we do have enough evidence to say that some are more likely than others.”

In the report, the team found that the v***s most likely jumped from one animal to another before making its way to humans. They also looked at evidence supporting theories that the v***s passed into humans directly from an original host animal, or that it traveled through the supply chain for frozen and refrigerated foods. In addition, the team addressed the possibility that the v***s accidentally leaked from a laboratory in W***n—a scenario they determined is “extremely unlikely.”

Here’s a look at the evidence the report lays out for each of the four theories—and what experts make of them as possible origin stories for SARS-CoV-2, the v***s that causes C****-**.

1. Direct spillover from animals to humans
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible to likely


The first origin story for SARS-CoV-2 is simple: It suggests that the v***s started out in an animal—probably a bat—that came into contact with a human. Boom, infected. At that point, the v***s immediately began to spread to other humans.

The WHO report cites strong evidence showing that most c****av***ses that infect humans come from animals, including the v***s that caused the SARS epidemic in 2003. Bats are thought to be the most likely culprits, as they host a v***s that is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2.

The report acknowledges the possibility that the v***s spread to humans from pangolins or minks. But David Robertson, head of v***l genomics and bioinformatics at the University of Glasgow, says the WHO joint team sampled many animal species beyond bats for the report. The analyses points to bats as the reservoir species.

“So what you have to worry about then is how did it get from bats to humans?” Robertson says. “Did somebody go into an area, get infected, and then get a train to W***n?”

Direct t***smission between bats and humans is possible: Studies have shown that people who live near bat caves in southern China’s Yunnan Province have antibodies to bat c****av***ses. But most humans generally don’t spend much time around bats, unless they are bat scientists (who typically wear protective equipment). So it’s unclear why, if the v***s jumped from bats directly to humans, the first outbreak would have occurred in W***n, a thousand miles away from the bat caves of Yunnan.

Furthermore, the report notes that it would take decades for even the closely related bat c****av***s to evolve into SARS-CoV-2. Since scientists haven’t found a bat v***s that would provide the missing link, the WHO team assessed this theory as “possible to likely.”

2. Spillover from animals to humans through an intermediate host
WHO ASSESSMENT: likely to very likely


In the absence of a smoking gun showing that bats passed the v***s directly to humans, scientists believe the more likely theory is that the v***s first traveled through another animal, such as a mink or a pangolin. Unlike bats, these animals have regular contact with humans—particularly if they’re being raised on a farm or trafficked in the illegal wildlife trade.

If the v***s jumped first to another animal, that might also explain how it adapted to be harmful to humans—although Robertson says that the v***s likely wouldn’t have had to change much. Genomic analyses suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is a generalist v***s rather than one specifically adapted to humans, explaining why it can easily jump among pangolins, mink, cats, and other species.

The WHO report points out that this is the path that previous c****av***ses have taken to infect humans. The SARS v***s, for example, is thought to have passed from bats to palm civets before causing a human epidemic in 2002. Meanwhile, the v***s that causes MERS has been found in dromedary camels throughout the Middle East.

Daniel Lucey, an adjunct professor of infectious diseases at Georgetown University Medical Center, says that the similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and its relatives SARS and MERS is a compelling argument that it might have started out the same way.

“Now we have three c****av***ses that cause pneumonia and systemic illness and death,” he says. “Past is prologue.”

But, if the theory holds true, it’s not clear what that intermediary animal might have been for SARS-CoV-2. The WHO team analyzed samples from thousands of farmed animals across China, all of which tested negative for the v***s. Lucey argues that the WHO team didn’t adequately test China’s farmed mink—one of the suspected intermediaries—but Rasmussen says the report itself acknowledges that it only scratches the surface.

“That’s a fraction of the animals that are farmed or captured or t***sported for this purpose in China,” she says. “I think we haven’t done anywhere near enough sampling.”

There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation and somebody needs to answer for this p******c. But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.
ANGELA RASMUSSENVIROLOGIST AT THE CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND SECURITY AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

3. Introduction through refrigerated or frozen foods
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible


Another theory holds that the v***s may have come to humans through what’s known as the cold chain—the supply line for distributing frozen and refrigerated foods. In this scenario, the v***s might have actually originated outside of China but was imported either on the surface of food packaging or in the food itself.

This theory gained traction last summer after a couple of outbreaks in China, and there has since been some evidence suggesting that pathogens can survive longer in cold temperatures.

Still, while the cold chain might have played a role in new outbreaks, scientists say there’s little reason to believe that it was the source of the p******c. There’s no direct evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for foodborne outbreaks, while Rasmussen notes that C****-** rarely spreads through surfaces—which was good news for those weary of wiping down their groceries.

“It’s not impossible,” she says. “You can’t rule it out. But I don’t think the evidence base is particularly strong for that.”

Rasmussen says a more plausible way that the v***s might spread through the food chain would be through wildlife that’s farmed for human consumption. But, she points out, that bleeds over into the territory of the theory for an intermediate host.

Some critics claim that this theory is a red herring to push suspicion from China and onto other countries. Lucey considers this pathway the least likely of the four the joint team identified, arguing it’s implausible that the v***s would have stayed viable on the packaging for as long as it took to import from Europe or elsewhere. He also questions why these infections would have turned up in W***n and nowhere else.

“To me, it’s beyond far-fetched,” he says.

4. Laboratory leak
WHO ASSESSMENT: extremely unlikely


The most controversial hypothesis for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is also the one that most scientists agree is the least likely: that the v***s somehow leaked out of a laboratory in W***n where researchers study bat c****av***ses. Originally promulgated by former President Donald Trump and his administration, this theory suggests that perhaps a researcher was infected in the lab—accidentally or otherwise—or manipulated a c****av***s strain to create SARS-CoV-2.

Although there have been laboratory leaks in the past, the WHO report points out that they’re rare. The main evidence it cites to support this theory is the fact that researchers at the W***n Institute of V******y have sequenced the bat c****av***s strain—called CoV RaTG13, which is 96.2 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2, and its closest known relative—as part of their effort to prevent zoonotic v***ses from spilling over to humans. A laboratory run by the W***n Center for Disease Control and Prevention has also worked with bat c****av***ses.

But that’s just about the only evidence that supports this hypothesis. The WHO report says there is no record that any W***n laboratory was working with a v***s more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 before the first cases of C****-** were diagnosed in December 2019, nor did any laboratory staff report any C***D-like symptoms suggesting that they had been infected. But scientists point out that the evidence both for and against the lab leak hypothesis is thin.

Lucey believes the lab leak theory is plausible, though less likely than zoonotic t***smission, given the lack of evidence. He points out that there was no forensic investigation of the labs in W***n, and he questions why the WHO authorized the team to investigate the lab at all without the mandate to conduct such an investigation or team members with the subject-matter expertise to carry it out.

“There’s not really any way to prove or disprove the lab leak theory based on what’s been presented in this report,” Rasmussen agrees, noting that to put the matter to rest there would need to be a forensic audit of lab records to look for the ancestral v***s to SARS-COV-2. “But my opinion is that the lab leak theory, while not impossible, is less likely to be the explanation.”

Rasmussen explains that there’s no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of genetic manipulation, nor is it likely that it could have been created by accident. It’s incredibly difficult to culture a v***s that’s strong enough to cause human infections from a bat sample, she says. Meanwhile, similar v***ses commonly occur in nature, making that the far likelier source.

Robertson says that supporters of the lab leak theory argue that SARS-CoV-2 has traveled too quickly and efficiently through the human population to be natural in origin. But if the v***s is a generalist, as genomic studies show, he says it’s not surprising that it is so effective at infecting humans.

“I think the evidence is pretty good that it didn’t have to change much to be successful in humans,” he says.

A research roadmap
Although the WHO report may not have shed much light on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, Robertson says this is just the beginning of what can sometimes be a long process. But he says there’s a public health imperative now to launch more rigorous follow-up studies.

“There’s a v***s somewhere out there that’s very close to SARS-CoV-2,” he says. “That seems to be the bit that’s terrifying.”

Rasmussen says that the WHO report lays out a roadmap for further studies to discover the origins of the v***s. It recommends better surveillance of captive and farmed animals to determine potential reservoir or intermediate hosts, as well as more sampling among bats—both in China and beyond, as there is also evidence of related c****av***ses circulating in regions such as Southeast Asia. The report also recommends in-depth epidemiological studies of the first C****-** cases.

Understanding how an outbreak got started helps scientists and governments pinpoint how to strengthen protections—whether that’s more rigorous surveillance for infections in animals and the food chain, or tighter biosafety protocols in laboratories.

“There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation, and somebody needs to answer for this p******c,” Rasmussen says. “But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.”

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 16:23:03   #
Carol Kelly
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/we-still-dont-know-the-origins-of-the-c****av***s-here-are-four-scenarios?cmpid=org=ngp::mc=crm-email::src=ngp::cmp=editorial::add=Science_20210407&rid=%24%7BProfile.CustomerKey%7D

We still don’t know the origins of the c****av***s. Here are 4 scenarios.
Experts say that understanding how the v***s first leapt from animals to humans is essential to preventing future p******cs.

BYAMY MCKEEVER
PUBLISHED APRIL 2, 2021
• 12 MIN READ

The search continues for the origins of the v***s that causes C****-**—and the pathway that it took to leap from animals to humans, wreaking havoc across the globe, infecting more than 129 million people, and k*****g more than 2.8 million.

Earlier this week, the World Health Organization released a report from a team of international researchers that traveled to China to investigate four possible scenarios in which the SARS-CoV-2 v***s might have caused the initial outbreak. In the days since, however, world governments have expressed concern that the investigators lacked access to complete data, while scientists say that the report has shed little light on how the v***s got jumpstarted.

That’s unsurprising given that it typically takes years to trace a v***s back to its roots—if it’s possible at all, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University Medical Center. But in this case, she says, “I think we do have enough evidence to say that some are more likely than others.”

In the report, the team found that the v***s most likely jumped from one animal to another before making its way to humans. They also looked at evidence supporting theories that the v***s passed into humans directly from an original host animal, or that it traveled through the supply chain for frozen and refrigerated foods. In addition, the team addressed the possibility that the v***s accidentally leaked from a laboratory in W***n—a scenario they determined is “extremely unlikely.”

Here’s a look at the evidence the report lays out for each of the four theories—and what experts make of them as possible origin stories for SARS-CoV-2, the v***s that causes C****-**.

1. Direct spillover from animals to humans
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible to likely


The first origin story for SARS-CoV-2 is simple: It suggests that the v***s started out in an animal—probably a bat—that came into contact with a human. Boom, infected. At that point, the v***s immediately began to spread to other humans.

The WHO report cites strong evidence showing that most c****av***ses that infect humans come from animals, including the v***s that caused the SARS epidemic in 2003. Bats are thought to be the most likely culprits, as they host a v***s that is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2.

The report acknowledges the possibility that the v***s spread to humans from pangolins or minks. But David Robertson, head of v***l genomics and bioinformatics at the University of Glasgow, says the WHO joint team sampled many animal species beyond bats for the report. The analyses points to bats as the reservoir species.

“So what you have to worry about then is how did it get from bats to humans?” Robertson says. “Did somebody go into an area, get infected, and then get a train to W***n?”

Direct t***smission between bats and humans is possible: Studies have shown that people who live near bat caves in southern China’s Yunnan Province have antibodies to bat c****av***ses. But most humans generally don’t spend much time around bats, unless they are bat scientists (who typically wear protective equipment). So it’s unclear why, if the v***s jumped from bats directly to humans, the first outbreak would have occurred in W***n, a thousand miles away from the bat caves of Yunnan.

Furthermore, the report notes that it would take decades for even the closely related bat c****av***s to evolve into SARS-CoV-2. Since scientists haven’t found a bat v***s that would provide the missing link, the WHO team assessed this theory as “possible to likely.”

2. Spillover from animals to humans through an intermediate host
WHO ASSESSMENT: likely to very likely


In the absence of a smoking gun showing that bats passed the v***s directly to humans, scientists believe the more likely theory is that the v***s first traveled through another animal, such as a mink or a pangolin. Unlike bats, these animals have regular contact with humans—particularly if they’re being raised on a farm or trafficked in the illegal wildlife trade.

If the v***s jumped first to another animal, that might also explain how it adapted to be harmful to humans—although Robertson says that the v***s likely wouldn’t have had to change much. Genomic analyses suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is a generalist v***s rather than one specifically adapted to humans, explaining why it can easily jump among pangolins, mink, cats, and other species.

The WHO report points out that this is the path that previous c****av***ses have taken to infect humans. The SARS v***s, for example, is thought to have passed from bats to palm civets before causing a human epidemic in 2002. Meanwhile, the v***s that causes MERS has been found in dromedary camels throughout the Middle East.

Daniel Lucey, an adjunct professor of infectious diseases at Georgetown University Medical Center, says that the similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and its relatives SARS and MERS is a compelling argument that it might have started out the same way.

“Now we have three c****av***ses that cause pneumonia and systemic illness and death,” he says. “Past is prologue.”

But, if the theory holds true, it’s not clear what that intermediary animal might have been for SARS-CoV-2. The WHO team analyzed samples from thousands of farmed animals across China, all of which tested negative for the v***s. Lucey argues that the WHO team didn’t adequately test China’s farmed mink—one of the suspected intermediaries—but Rasmussen says the report itself acknowledges that it only scratches the surface.

“That’s a fraction of the animals that are farmed or captured or t***sported for this purpose in China,” she says. “I think we haven’t done anywhere near enough sampling.”

There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation and somebody needs to answer for this p******c. But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.
ANGELA RASMUSSENVIROLOGIST AT THE CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND SECURITY AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

3. Introduction through refrigerated or frozen foods
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible


Another theory holds that the v***s may have come to humans through what’s known as the cold chain—the supply line for distributing frozen and refrigerated foods. In this scenario, the v***s might have actually originated outside of China but was imported either on the surface of food packaging or in the food itself.

This theory gained traction last summer after a couple of outbreaks in China, and there has since been some evidence suggesting that pathogens can survive longer in cold temperatures.

Still, while the cold chain might have played a role in new outbreaks, scientists say there’s little reason to believe that it was the source of the p******c. There’s no direct evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for foodborne outbreaks, while Rasmussen notes that C****-** rarely spreads through surfaces—which was good news for those weary of wiping down their groceries.

“It’s not impossible,” she says. “You can’t rule it out. But I don’t think the evidence base is particularly strong for that.”

Rasmussen says a more plausible way that the v***s might spread through the food chain would be through wildlife that’s farmed for human consumption. But, she points out, that bleeds over into the territory of the theory for an intermediate host.

Some critics claim that this theory is a red herring to push suspicion from China and onto other countries. Lucey considers this pathway the least likely of the four the joint team identified, arguing it’s implausible that the v***s would have stayed viable on the packaging for as long as it took to import from Europe or elsewhere. He also questions why these infections would have turned up in W***n and nowhere else.

“To me, it’s beyond far-fetched,” he says.

4. Laboratory leak
WHO ASSESSMENT: extremely unlikely


The most controversial hypothesis for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is also the one that most scientists agree is the least likely: that the v***s somehow leaked out of a laboratory in W***n where researchers study bat c****av***ses. Originally promulgated by former President Donald Trump and his administration, this theory suggests that perhaps a researcher was infected in the lab—accidentally or otherwise—or manipulated a c****av***s strain to create SARS-CoV-2.

Although there have been laboratory leaks in the past, the WHO report points out that they’re rare. The main evidence it cites to support this theory is the fact that researchers at the W***n Institute of V******y have sequenced the bat c****av***s strain—called CoV RaTG13, which is 96.2 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2, and its closest known relative—as part of their effort to prevent zoonotic v***ses from spilling over to humans. A laboratory run by the W***n Center for Disease Control and Prevention has also worked with bat c****av***ses.

But that’s just about the only evidence that supports this hypothesis. The WHO report says there is no record that any W***n laboratory was working with a v***s more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 before the first cases of C****-** were diagnosed in December 2019, nor did any laboratory staff report any C***D-like symptoms suggesting that they had been infected. But scientists point out that the evidence both for and against the lab leak hypothesis is thin.

Lucey believes the lab leak theory is plausible, though less likely than zoonotic t***smission, given the lack of evidence. He points out that there was no forensic investigation of the labs in W***n, and he questions why the WHO authorized the team to investigate the lab at all without the mandate to conduct such an investigation or team members with the subject-matter expertise to carry it out.

“There’s not really any way to prove or disprove the lab leak theory based on what’s been presented in this report,” Rasmussen agrees, noting that to put the matter to rest there would need to be a forensic audit of lab records to look for the ancestral v***s to SARS-COV-2. “But my opinion is that the lab leak theory, while not impossible, is less likely to be the explanation.”

Rasmussen explains that there’s no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of genetic manipulation, nor is it likely that it could have been created by accident. It’s incredibly difficult to culture a v***s that’s strong enough to cause human infections from a bat sample, she says. Meanwhile, similar v***ses commonly occur in nature, making that the far likelier source.

Robertson says that supporters of the lab leak theory argue that SARS-CoV-2 has traveled too quickly and efficiently through the human population to be natural in origin. But if the v***s is a generalist, as genomic studies show, he says it’s not surprising that it is so effective at infecting humans.

“I think the evidence is pretty good that it didn’t have to change much to be successful in humans,” he says.

A research roadmap
Although the WHO report may not have shed much light on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, Robertson says this is just the beginning of what can sometimes be a long process. But he says there’s a public health imperative now to launch more rigorous follow-up studies.

“There’s a v***s somewhere out there that’s very close to SARS-CoV-2,” he says. “That seems to be the bit that’s terrifying.”

Rasmussen says that the WHO report lays out a roadmap for further studies to discover the origins of the v***s. It recommends better surveillance of captive and farmed animals to determine potential reservoir or intermediate hosts, as well as more sampling among bats—both in China and beyond, as there is also evidence of related c****av***ses circulating in regions such as Southeast Asia. The report also recommends in-depth epidemiological studies of the first C****-** cases.

Understanding how an outbreak got started helps scientists and governments pinpoint how to strengthen protections—whether that’s more rigorous surveillance for infections in animals and the food chain, or tighter biosafety protocols in laboratories.

“There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation, and somebody needs to answer for this p******c,” Rasmussen says. “But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.”
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article... (show quote)


I believe we do. Biden conspires with the Chinese. They help each other.

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 16:31:03   #
ChJoe
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/we-still-dont-know-the-origins-of-the-c****av***s-here-are-four-scenarios?cmpid=org=ngp::mc=crm-email::src=ngp::cmp=editorial::add=Science_20210407&rid=%24%7BProfile.CustomerKey%7D

We still don’t know the origins of the c****av***s. Here are 4 scenarios.
Experts say that understanding how the v***s first leapt from animals to humans is essential to preventing future p******cs.

BYAMY MCKEEVER
PUBLISHED APRIL 2, 2021
• 12 MIN READ

The search continues for the origins of the v***s that causes C****-**—and the pathway that it took to leap from animals to humans, wreaking havoc across the globe, infecting more than 129 million people, and k*****g more than 2.8 million.

Earlier this week, the World Health Organization released a report from a team of international researchers that traveled to China to investigate four possible scenarios in which the SARS-CoV-2 v***s might have caused the initial outbreak. In the days since, however, world governments have expressed concern that the investigators lacked access to complete data, while scientists say that the report has shed little light on how the v***s got jumpstarted.

That’s unsurprising given that it typically takes years to trace a v***s back to its roots—if it’s possible at all, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University Medical Center. But in this case, she says, “I think we do have enough evidence to say that some are more likely than others.”

In the report, the team found that the v***s most likely jumped from one animal to another before making its way to humans. They also looked at evidence supporting theories that the v***s passed into humans directly from an original host animal, or that it traveled through the supply chain for frozen and refrigerated foods. In addition, the team addressed the possibility that the v***s accidentally leaked from a laboratory in W***n—a scenario they determined is “extremely unlikely.”

Here’s a look at the evidence the report lays out for each of the four theories—and what experts make of them as possible origin stories for SARS-CoV-2, the v***s that causes C****-**.

1. Direct spillover from animals to humans
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible to likely


The first origin story for SARS-CoV-2 is simple: It suggests that the v***s started out in an animal—probably a bat—that came into contact with a human. Boom, infected. At that point, the v***s immediately began to spread to other humans.

The WHO report cites strong evidence showing that most c****av***ses that infect humans come from animals, including the v***s that caused the SARS epidemic in 2003. Bats are thought to be the most likely culprits, as they host a v***s that is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2.

The report acknowledges the possibility that the v***s spread to humans from pangolins or minks. But David Robertson, head of v***l genomics and bioinformatics at the University of Glasgow, says the WHO joint team sampled many animal species beyond bats for the report. The analyses points to bats as the reservoir species.

“So what you have to worry about then is how did it get from bats to humans?” Robertson says. “Did somebody go into an area, get infected, and then get a train to W***n?”

Direct t***smission between bats and humans is possible: Studies have shown that people who live near bat caves in southern China’s Yunnan Province have antibodies to bat c****av***ses. But most humans generally don’t spend much time around bats, unless they are bat scientists (who typically wear protective equipment). So it’s unclear why, if the v***s jumped from bats directly to humans, the first outbreak would have occurred in W***n, a thousand miles away from the bat caves of Yunnan.

Furthermore, the report notes that it would take decades for even the closely related bat c****av***s to evolve into SARS-CoV-2. Since scientists haven’t found a bat v***s that would provide the missing link, the WHO team assessed this theory as “possible to likely.”

2. Spillover from animals to humans through an intermediate host
WHO ASSESSMENT: likely to very likely


In the absence of a smoking gun showing that bats passed the v***s directly to humans, scientists believe the more likely theory is that the v***s first traveled through another animal, such as a mink or a pangolin. Unlike bats, these animals have regular contact with humans—particularly if they’re being raised on a farm or trafficked in the illegal wildlife trade.

If the v***s jumped first to another animal, that might also explain how it adapted to be harmful to humans—although Robertson says that the v***s likely wouldn’t have had to change much. Genomic analyses suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is a generalist v***s rather than one specifically adapted to humans, explaining why it can easily jump among pangolins, mink, cats, and other species.

The WHO report points out that this is the path that previous c****av***ses have taken to infect humans. The SARS v***s, for example, is thought to have passed from bats to palm civets before causing a human epidemic in 2002. Meanwhile, the v***s that causes MERS has been found in dromedary camels throughout the Middle East.

Daniel Lucey, an adjunct professor of infectious diseases at Georgetown University Medical Center, says that the similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and its relatives SARS and MERS is a compelling argument that it might have started out the same way.

“Now we have three c****av***ses that cause pneumonia and systemic illness and death,” he says. “Past is prologue.”

But, if the theory holds true, it’s not clear what that intermediary animal might have been for SARS-CoV-2. The WHO team analyzed samples from thousands of farmed animals across China, all of which tested negative for the v***s. Lucey argues that the WHO team didn’t adequately test China’s farmed mink—one of the suspected intermediaries—but Rasmussen says the report itself acknowledges that it only scratches the surface.

“That’s a fraction of the animals that are farmed or captured or t***sported for this purpose in China,” she says. “I think we haven’t done anywhere near enough sampling.”

There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation and somebody needs to answer for this p******c. But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.
ANGELA RASMUSSENVIROLOGIST AT THE CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND SECURITY AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

3. Introduction through refrigerated or frozen foods
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible


Another theory holds that the v***s may have come to humans through what’s known as the cold chain—the supply line for distributing frozen and refrigerated foods. In this scenario, the v***s might have actually originated outside of China but was imported either on the surface of food packaging or in the food itself.

This theory gained traction last summer after a couple of outbreaks in China, and there has since been some evidence suggesting that pathogens can survive longer in cold temperatures.

Still, while the cold chain might have played a role in new outbreaks, scientists say there’s little reason to believe that it was the source of the p******c. There’s no direct evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for foodborne outbreaks, while Rasmussen notes that C****-** rarely spreads through surfaces—which was good news for those weary of wiping down their groceries.

“It’s not impossible,” she says. “You can’t rule it out. But I don’t think the evidence base is particularly strong for that.”

Rasmussen says a more plausible way that the v***s might spread through the food chain would be through wildlife that’s farmed for human consumption. But, she points out, that bleeds over into the territory of the theory for an intermediate host.

Some critics claim that this theory is a red herring to push suspicion from China and onto other countries. Lucey considers this pathway the least likely of the four the joint team identified, arguing it’s implausible that the v***s would have stayed viable on the packaging for as long as it took to import from Europe or elsewhere. He also questions why these infections would have turned up in W***n and nowhere else.

“To me, it’s beyond far-fetched,” he says.

4. Laboratory leak
WHO ASSESSMENT: extremely unlikely


The most controversial hypothesis for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is also the one that most scientists agree is the least likely: that the v***s somehow leaked out of a laboratory in W***n where researchers study bat c****av***ses. Originally promulgated by former President Donald Trump and his administration, this theory suggests that perhaps a researcher was infected in the lab—accidentally or otherwise—or manipulated a c****av***s strain to create SARS-CoV-2.

Although there have been laboratory leaks in the past, the WHO report points out that they’re rare. The main evidence it cites to support this theory is the fact that researchers at the W***n Institute of V******y have sequenced the bat c****av***s strain—called CoV RaTG13, which is 96.2 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2, and its closest known relative—as part of their effort to prevent zoonotic v***ses from spilling over to humans. A laboratory run by the W***n Center for Disease Control and Prevention has also worked with bat c****av***ses.

But that’s just about the only evidence that supports this hypothesis. The WHO report says there is no record that any W***n laboratory was working with a v***s more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 before the first cases of C****-** were diagnosed in December 2019, nor did any laboratory staff report any C***D-like symptoms suggesting that they had been infected. But scientists point out that the evidence both for and against the lab leak hypothesis is thin.

Lucey believes the lab leak theory is plausible, though less likely than zoonotic t***smission, given the lack of evidence. He points out that there was no forensic investigation of the labs in W***n, and he questions why the WHO authorized the team to investigate the lab at all without the mandate to conduct such an investigation or team members with the subject-matter expertise to carry it out.

“There’s not really any way to prove or disprove the lab leak theory based on what’s been presented in this report,” Rasmussen agrees, noting that to put the matter to rest there would need to be a forensic audit of lab records to look for the ancestral v***s to SARS-COV-2. “But my opinion is that the lab leak theory, while not impossible, is less likely to be the explanation.”

Rasmussen explains that there’s no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of genetic manipulation, nor is it likely that it could have been created by accident. It’s incredibly difficult to culture a v***s that’s strong enough to cause human infections from a bat sample, she says. Meanwhile, similar v***ses commonly occur in nature, making that the far likelier source.

Robertson says that supporters of the lab leak theory argue that SARS-CoV-2 has traveled too quickly and efficiently through the human population to be natural in origin. But if the v***s is a generalist, as genomic studies show, he says it’s not surprising that it is so effective at infecting humans.

“I think the evidence is pretty good that it didn’t have to change much to be successful in humans,” he says.

A research roadmap
Although the WHO report may not have shed much light on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, Robertson says this is just the beginning of what can sometimes be a long process. But he says there’s a public health imperative now to launch more rigorous follow-up studies.

“There’s a v***s somewhere out there that’s very close to SARS-CoV-2,” he says. “That seems to be the bit that’s terrifying.”

Rasmussen says that the WHO report lays out a roadmap for further studies to discover the origins of the v***s. It recommends better surveillance of captive and farmed animals to determine potential reservoir or intermediate hosts, as well as more sampling among bats—both in China and beyond, as there is also evidence of related c****av***ses circulating in regions such as Southeast Asia. The report also recommends in-depth epidemiological studies of the first C****-** cases.

Understanding how an outbreak got started helps scientists and governments pinpoint how to strengthen protections—whether that’s more rigorous surveillance for infections in animals and the food chain, or tighter biosafety protocols in laboratories.

“There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation, and somebody needs to answer for this p******c,” Rasmussen says. “But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.”
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article... (show quote)


It's very clear that this is the source and it is too coincidental that it was not planned.

Reply
 
 
Apr 7, 2021 16:41:41   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
ChJoe wrote:
It's very clear that this is the source and it is too coincidental that it was not planned.


It's clear that this is the source. What is the "this?"

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 17:04:52   #
Liberty Tree
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
I believe we do. Biden conspires with the Chinese. They help each other.


The origin is known we are just not being told the t***h.

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 17:45:39   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
dtucker300 wrote:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/we-still-dont-know-the-origins-of-the-c****av***s-here-are-four-scenarios?cmpid=org=ngp::mc=crm-email::src=ngp::cmp=editorial::add=Science_20210407&rid=%24%7BProfile.CustomerKey%7D

We still don’t know the origins of the c****av***s. Here are 4 scenarios.
Experts say that understanding how the v***s first leapt from animals to humans is essential to preventing future p******cs.

BYAMY MCKEEVER
PUBLISHED APRIL 2, 2021
• 12 MIN READ

The search continues for the origins of the v***s that causes C****-**—and the pathway that it took to leap from animals to humans, wreaking havoc across the globe, infecting more than 129 million people, and k*****g more than 2.8 million.

Earlier this week, the World Health Organization released a report from a team of international researchers that traveled to China to investigate four possible scenarios in which the SARS-CoV-2 v***s might have caused the initial outbreak. In the days since, however, world governments have expressed concern that the investigators lacked access to complete data, while scientists say that the report has shed little light on how the v***s got jumpstarted.

That’s unsurprising given that it typically takes years to trace a v***s back to its roots—if it’s possible at all, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University Medical Center. But in this case, she says, “I think we do have enough evidence to say that some are more likely than others.”

In the report, the team found that the v***s most likely jumped from one animal to another before making its way to humans. They also looked at evidence supporting theories that the v***s passed into humans directly from an original host animal, or that it traveled through the supply chain for frozen and refrigerated foods. In addition, the team addressed the possibility that the v***s accidentally leaked from a laboratory in W***n—a scenario they determined is “extremely unlikely.”

Here’s a look at the evidence the report lays out for each of the four theories—and what experts make of them as possible origin stories for SARS-CoV-2, the v***s that causes C****-**.

1. Direct spillover from animals to humans
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible to likely


The first origin story for SARS-CoV-2 is simple: It suggests that the v***s started out in an animal—probably a bat—that came into contact with a human. Boom, infected. At that point, the v***s immediately began to spread to other humans.

The WHO report cites strong evidence showing that most c****av***ses that infect humans come from animals, including the v***s that caused the SARS epidemic in 2003. Bats are thought to be the most likely culprits, as they host a v***s that is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2.

The report acknowledges the possibility that the v***s spread to humans from pangolins or minks. But David Robertson, head of v***l genomics and bioinformatics at the University of Glasgow, says the WHO joint team sampled many animal species beyond bats for the report. The analyses points to bats as the reservoir species.

“So what you have to worry about then is how did it get from bats to humans?” Robertson says. “Did somebody go into an area, get infected, and then get a train to W***n?”

Direct t***smission between bats and humans is possible: Studies have shown that people who live near bat caves in southern China’s Yunnan Province have antibodies to bat c****av***ses. But most humans generally don’t spend much time around bats, unless they are bat scientists (who typically wear protective equipment). So it’s unclear why, if the v***s jumped from bats directly to humans, the first outbreak would have occurred in W***n, a thousand miles away from the bat caves of Yunnan.

Furthermore, the report notes that it would take decades for even the closely related bat c****av***s to evolve into SARS-CoV-2. Since scientists haven’t found a bat v***s that would provide the missing link, the WHO team assessed this theory as “possible to likely.”

2. Spillover from animals to humans through an intermediate host
WHO ASSESSMENT: likely to very likely


In the absence of a smoking gun showing that bats passed the v***s directly to humans, scientists believe the more likely theory is that the v***s first traveled through another animal, such as a mink or a pangolin. Unlike bats, these animals have regular contact with humans—particularly if they’re being raised on a farm or trafficked in the illegal wildlife trade.

If the v***s jumped first to another animal, that might also explain how it adapted to be harmful to humans—although Robertson says that the v***s likely wouldn’t have had to change much. Genomic analyses suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is a generalist v***s rather than one specifically adapted to humans, explaining why it can easily jump among pangolins, mink, cats, and other species.

The WHO report points out that this is the path that previous c****av***ses have taken to infect humans. The SARS v***s, for example, is thought to have passed from bats to palm civets before causing a human epidemic in 2002. Meanwhile, the v***s that causes MERS has been found in dromedary camels throughout the Middle East.

Daniel Lucey, an adjunct professor of infectious diseases at Georgetown University Medical Center, says that the similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and its relatives SARS and MERS is a compelling argument that it might have started out the same way.

“Now we have three c****av***ses that cause pneumonia and systemic illness and death,” he says. “Past is prologue.”

But, if the theory holds true, it’s not clear what that intermediary animal might have been for SARS-CoV-2. The WHO team analyzed samples from thousands of farmed animals across China, all of which tested negative for the v***s. Lucey argues that the WHO team didn’t adequately test China’s farmed mink—one of the suspected intermediaries—but Rasmussen says the report itself acknowledges that it only scratches the surface.

“That’s a fraction of the animals that are farmed or captured or t***sported for this purpose in China,” she says. “I think we haven’t done anywhere near enough sampling.”

There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation and somebody needs to answer for this p******c. But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.
ANGELA RASMUSSENVIROLOGIST AT THE CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE AND SECURITY AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

3. Introduction through refrigerated or frozen foods
WHO ASSESSMENT: possible


Another theory holds that the v***s may have come to humans through what’s known as the cold chain—the supply line for distributing frozen and refrigerated foods. In this scenario, the v***s might have actually originated outside of China but was imported either on the surface of food packaging or in the food itself.

This theory gained traction last summer after a couple of outbreaks in China, and there has since been some evidence suggesting that pathogens can survive longer in cold temperatures.

Still, while the cold chain might have played a role in new outbreaks, scientists say there’s little reason to believe that it was the source of the p******c. There’s no direct evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for foodborne outbreaks, while Rasmussen notes that C****-** rarely spreads through surfaces—which was good news for those weary of wiping down their groceries.

“It’s not impossible,” she says. “You can’t rule it out. But I don’t think the evidence base is particularly strong for that.”

Rasmussen says a more plausible way that the v***s might spread through the food chain would be through wildlife that’s farmed for human consumption. But, she points out, that bleeds over into the territory of the theory for an intermediate host.

Some critics claim that this theory is a red herring to push suspicion from China and onto other countries. Lucey considers this pathway the least likely of the four the joint team identified, arguing it’s implausible that the v***s would have stayed viable on the packaging for as long as it took to import from Europe or elsewhere. He also questions why these infections would have turned up in W***n and nowhere else.

“To me, it’s beyond far-fetched,” he says.

4. Laboratory leak
WHO ASSESSMENT: extremely unlikely


The most controversial hypothesis for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is also the one that most scientists agree is the least likely: that the v***s somehow leaked out of a laboratory in W***n where researchers study bat c****av***ses. Originally promulgated by former President Donald Trump and his administration, this theory suggests that perhaps a researcher was infected in the lab—accidentally or otherwise—or manipulated a c****av***s strain to create SARS-CoV-2.

Although there have been laboratory leaks in the past, the WHO report points out that they’re rare. The main evidence it cites to support this theory is the fact that researchers at the W***n Institute of V******y have sequenced the bat c****av***s strain—called CoV RaTG13, which is 96.2 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2, and its closest known relative—as part of their effort to prevent zoonotic v***ses from spilling over to humans. A laboratory run by the W***n Center for Disease Control and Prevention has also worked with bat c****av***ses.

But that’s just about the only evidence that supports this hypothesis. The WHO report says there is no record that any W***n laboratory was working with a v***s more closely related to SARS-CoV-2 before the first cases of C****-** were diagnosed in December 2019, nor did any laboratory staff report any C***D-like symptoms suggesting that they had been infected. But scientists point out that the evidence both for and against the lab leak hypothesis is thin.

Lucey believes the lab leak theory is plausible, though less likely than zoonotic t***smission, given the lack of evidence. He points out that there was no forensic investigation of the labs in W***n, and he questions why the WHO authorized the team to investigate the lab at all without the mandate to conduct such an investigation or team members with the subject-matter expertise to carry it out.

“There’s not really any way to prove or disprove the lab leak theory based on what’s been presented in this report,” Rasmussen agrees, noting that to put the matter to rest there would need to be a forensic audit of lab records to look for the ancestral v***s to SARS-COV-2. “But my opinion is that the lab leak theory, while not impossible, is less likely to be the explanation.”

Rasmussen explains that there’s no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of genetic manipulation, nor is it likely that it could have been created by accident. It’s incredibly difficult to culture a v***s that’s strong enough to cause human infections from a bat sample, she says. Meanwhile, similar v***ses commonly occur in nature, making that the far likelier source.

Robertson says that supporters of the lab leak theory argue that SARS-CoV-2 has traveled too quickly and efficiently through the human population to be natural in origin. But if the v***s is a generalist, as genomic studies show, he says it’s not surprising that it is so effective at infecting humans.

“I think the evidence is pretty good that it didn’t have to change much to be successful in humans,” he says.

A research roadmap
Although the WHO report may not have shed much light on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, Robertson says this is just the beginning of what can sometimes be a long process. But he says there’s a public health imperative now to launch more rigorous follow-up studies.

“There’s a v***s somewhere out there that’s very close to SARS-CoV-2,” he says. “That seems to be the bit that’s terrifying.”

Rasmussen says that the WHO report lays out a roadmap for further studies to discover the origins of the v***s. It recommends better surveillance of captive and farmed animals to determine potential reservoir or intermediate hosts, as well as more sampling among bats—both in China and beyond, as there is also evidence of related c****av***ses circulating in regions such as Southeast Asia. The report also recommends in-depth epidemiological studies of the first C****-** cases.

Understanding how an outbreak got started helps scientists and governments pinpoint how to strengthen protections—whether that’s more rigorous surveillance for infections in animals and the food chain, or tighter biosafety protocols in laboratories.

“There’s a popular perception that we need some kind of justice or explanation, and somebody needs to answer for this p******c,” Rasmussen says. “But the real reason why we need to figure out the origin is so that it can inform our efforts to prevent another p******c like this from happening.”
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article... (show quote)


The people who don’t want you to know, will make sure you don’t know .
You should be looking forward instead of backwards.
As in
When can we force it to end ?

Reply
Apr 7, 2021 21:54:28   #
Sicilianthing
 
Nope! But you’re still wearing the mask like a good lil minion !

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2021 05:28:58   #
NoRapture
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
Nope! But you’re still wearing the mask like a good lil minion !


And their invisible blindfold.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 13:04:20   #
Sicilianthing
 
NoRapture wrote:
And their invisible blindfold.


>>>

Of course, they are stupid sheeple !

Soon they will take the mark of the beast without knowing how it happened to them because they’re STUPID !

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 16:21:12   #
jimjd18495
 
The Chink-O-Crat v***s was developed in the level four bio-weapons lab in Wahun, China. It has a patent number. The lab is owned by Bill Gates and takes funding from George Soros. This is common knowledge and easily checked.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 16:46:52   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
jimjd18495 wrote:
The Chink-O-Crat v***s was developed in the level four bio-weapons lab in Wahun, China. It has a patent number. The lab is owned by Bill Gates and takes funding from George Soros. This is common knowledge and easily checked.


More like a common accusation. Include some references that are legit and not f**e news, please.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2021 19:05:08   #
Army
 
It's origin this Democrat demon krat . Well it's a planed v***s to dismantle the world & bring in the Best system as we see being used on every level now in our life's .
To attack us control us even k**l us there goal . None of there facts or proposals mandates make common since an won't . Always read between the lines .

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 20:54:43   #
Sicilianthing
 
jimjd18495 wrote:
The Chink-O-Crat v***s was developed in the level four bio-weapons lab in Wahun, China. It has a patent number. The lab is owned by Bill Gates and takes funding from George Soros. This is common knowledge and easily checked.


>>>

I already have it all from a long time ago.

You can also go to the topics of the W.H.O. Who invented the C***d Word to replace the flu strains so they could experiment with their P*******c deployment methodologies and lockdowns...

The next event is scheduled for the Fall of 2021 and beyond...

Ebola will also be released soon.

The Stupid Sheeple have no clue what or who they’re really dealing with when it comes to the forces behind all these actions in our illegitimate governments.

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 20:55:20   #
Sicilianthing
 
dtucker300 wrote:
More like a common accusation. Include some references that are legit and not f**e news, please.


>>>

It’s been posted many times throughout 2020 Tucker... get real man !

Reply
Apr 8, 2021 20:56:29   #
Sicilianthing
 
Army wrote:
It's origin this Democrat demon krat . Well it's a planed v***s to dismantle the world & bring in the Best system as we see being used on every level now in our life's .
To attack us control us even k**l us there goal . None of there facts or proposals mandates make common since an won't . Always read between the lines .


>>>

The Stupid Sheeple you’re trying to reply to and reach are too stupid to connect the dots.





Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.