One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The v******ted will DIE; the unv******ted will be HUNTED
Page <<first <prev 10 of 11 next>
Apr 14, 2021 16:12:08   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
PeterS wrote:
Why guillotines? Just leave you alone and you will die from your own stupidity...Darwin's law.


Darwin never had a law - he had a theory that has never been proven!!

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 16:14:26   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
EmilyD wrote:
It will become a Catch-22...damned if you do, damned if you don't. And we're almost there...


BINGO!!

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 16:18:14   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Dwbill wrote:
Damn y no one will listen to me !??? You are 100%


Thank you!

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2021 16:25:45   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Here's a news flash for you, everyone you know our will ever know will die, eventually. It's part of the cycle of life. Some that have access to great health care will live longer. Those that believe in voodoo medicine (like yourself) will have shorter lives. The number of deaths within 5 minutes of a c***d v******tion is the same as the number of intelligent comments you've ever made.


Well duh! God set the limit at 120 years of age and I'm already as close to that as I ever want to be - especially with the number of morons in the world who have nothing to contribute except lies and hearsay they learned from the mainstream media.

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 17:21:15   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
lpnmajor wrote:



Reply
Apr 14, 2021 20:19:51   #
PeterS
 
SSDD wrote:
I disagree, there are many conservatives that if you aren't insulting, they won't be either, at least for a while at any rate. I will agree that there are far too many that will be insulting regardless though.

So who are they?

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 20:22:41   #
PeterS
 
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
Darwin never had a law - he had a theory that has never been proven!!

Snip>>>Darwin's law of natural se******n implies that a population in equilibrium with its environment under natural se******n will have a phenotype that maximizes the fitness locally. (otherwise known as survival of the fittest)

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2021 22:32:29   #
Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
PeterS wrote:
(otherwise known as survival of the fittest)


That's God's law and Darwin had nothing to do with that!

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 23:28:11   #
SSDD
 
Avant8914 wrote:
I appreciate that observation and have made it myself many times when texting back and forth with my kids. I don’t lie and don’t appreciate being called a liar by someone who doesn’t know me at all. I could sit here and describe the hours and days worth of research and activism I’ve put in during my lifetime but it’s only words to you. I have no intention of defending myself from the rhetoric of someone who is not vested in my life or my heart. I don’t watch TV at all so I’m not sure how my mentioning a few RW news media outlets that I never said I watch and readily admitted caters to the right a bit just like LW caters to the left a bit turned into me becoming the biggest lying, fantasy dwelling reprobate on the planet but it did and you’ve practically written a book raking me over the coals with it as well as offering to get really tyrannical which I assume only meant in your texting.

To tell the t***h, I’m too busy trying to keep up with what our government is up to to waste time listening to all the media that just can’t keep from adding their own biased opinions as fact. I really am interested in the viewpoint you have but I don’t feel we can get anywhere with minds already made up and an intolerance for the other side that borders on phobia. I had some real questions that I asked you but you were so angry with me that you never even addressed them. In fact, I’ve been a bit confused by just how upset you seemed to be at me. I’ve read and re-read my responses and can’t find most of the triggers that set you off other than the part about the rudeness being on both sides. I thought I explained myself. I admit that although I do feel the left is highly emotional and hard to have a conversation with, the right can be a bit hardheaded. I just want to get along with people from all sides of life without having beliefs that are not my own shoved down my throat and the throats of my children. I could never tolerate a lot of the left’s beliefs in my own life but I can appreciate that everyone should have the right to what they want as part of their own as long as it doesn’t infringe on those same rights others have. I don’t need you to believe just like me to be able to share our world together. It used to work just fine. Don’t you wonder what happened?

My son is gay and that causes some parents to ostracize their child. I’m a Christian so you can imagine how it hit me but I believe he has the right to live his life according to his own beliefs. I would never condemn him because I have my own sins to answer for one day. I don’t have to agree with you to care about you. My fears are for us all regardless of who did what or how so and so believes. You are a person deserving of happiness and freedom and I hope we will always have the right to pursue it on our own path. I believe we would get along just fine. I have opinions and make observations but when discussing the messiness of human feelings I try very hard not to judge outright. I’ve had a lot of difficulties in my life and it has taught me that life can shape a person in a way you might not agree with but we all survive the best way we can and no one has a right to say, “you didn’t survive right.” I believe escaping victim hood is paramount to real freedom so I spent my life refusing to be one and helping others to do the same. I hope we’ve reached a middle ground that we can move forward from. I will never scoff at someone with real questions and a real desire to make a difference but I don’t assume to know you well enough to take you to task for something I have no clue about. There are far to many nuances to the human heart and mind to believe I could ever know who you really are or what you are really like after only a few emotionally heightened texts. I will use words like I think, I believe but I try to make it obvious that it’s my personal opinion or just my interpretation of what I’m hearing, reading or seeing.

Thank you for clarifying the tone of the texts. I wish you the best of days and I hope maybe we can start again. I think any two people can start a bridge. It might as well be us since we’ve already hit each other’s thumbs with the hammer.
I appreciate that observation and have made it mys... (show quote)


I can not recall YOU ever making me angry, EVER. Do I agree with you typically? No, have you ever said anything that COULD make me angry? Again, no, unless I would be pre-disposed to become angry due to something going on in real life. Thus far, that hasn't ever happened to the best of my knowledge. Have you said things that I would strongly disagree with? Yes, that has happened frequently, it just hasn't made me angry as yet.



As for, "My son is gay and that causes some parents to ostracize their child. I’m a Christian so you can imagine how it hit me but I believe he has the right to live his life according to his own beliefs. I would never condemn him because I have my own sins to answer for one day. I don’t have to agree with you to care about you. My fears are for us all regardless of who did what or how so and so believes. You are a person deserving of happiness and freedom and I hope we will always have the right to pursue it on our own path."


Why should homosexuality be anyone's business? For that matter, why should any religious sect or deity consider it a sin? Your child being gay shouldn't have any impact on you whatsoever to be honest. There is ABSOLUTELY no reason being different from another/others should EVER be a real issue, being different is what makes us interesting. Can you imagine how boring everything would be if we were all exactly alike? When you say "I’m a Christian so you can imagine how it hit me but I believe he has the right to live his life according to his own beliefs.", what that tells me is that you bear resentment over your child's "gayness", that you still have a ways to go to reach total acceptance. Unexpected news can and does "hit us", can and does have some form of shocking impact at the time of impact, but when one chooses to mention religious affiliation as a reason for why some news might hit them perhaps harder than otherwise, that tends to indicate some level of prejudice.

I prefer to believe that a true "God" will not care what one does if it will not harm themselves or others. All throughout history people have always found ways to h**e others for their differences. All throughout history what goes into the history books have been "filtered" to depict historic events in a certain light. All throughout history people's personal prejudices and bigotries have affected their beliefs, even in regards to religion. I seriously suspect that anything the bible says about the sinfulness of homosexuality was likely injected into the bible by those that had prejudices against homosexuality.

Regardless of whether your God considers homosexuality as a sin, it is for God to judge, not mere mortals. Love your son and don't worry about their sexual preferences.




As for, "Thank you for clarifying the tone of the texts. I wish you the best of days and I hope maybe we can start again. I think any two people can start a bridge. It might as well be us since we’ve already hit each other’s thumbs with the hammer."


I am always willing to forgive, perhaps not to forget, even though I always end up forgetting eventually, just not willingly. I believe that if one does not learn from history, they are bound to repeat it, wouldn't THAT be reason enough to try not to forget, even IF one is willing to forgive?

So... I am game to start over, a reset if you will... I look forward to seeing how things move on from here.

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 23:35:42   #
SSDD
 
PeterS wrote:
So who are they?


Have you not met Canuckus Deploracus, even if that poster has taken a dislike of me, he does seem to be capable of being cordial, provided the other party is as well.

Reply
Apr 14, 2021 23:50:32   #
SSDD
 
PeterS wrote:
Snip>>>Darwin's law of natural se******n implies that a population in equilibrium with its environment under natural se******n will have a phenotype that maximizes the fitness locally. (otherwise known as survival of the fittest)


That poster has an aversion to science obviously.



As for their statement "Darwin never had a law - he had a theory that has never been proven!!", obviously they aren't aware that EVERY scientific law starts off and typically remains a theory. That tends to be the way of science, ALWAYS some "anomaly" comes along that causes a theory to NEVER be considered a law due to "not being proven" due to the "anomaly" causing an example that does not appear to conform to the theory's "laws". It is typically caused by some variable that "breaks the rules". Until we find the reason or cause behind these anomalies and how they affect outcomes, the theory, regardless of how accurate it may be, will never be conclusively proven as fact, even if it IS a fact.

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2021 04:11:16   #
PeterS
 
SSDD wrote:
Have you not met Canuckus Deploracus, even if that poster has taken a dislike of me, he does seem to be capable of being cordial, provided the other party is as well.

You mean the Chinese Canadian? He's not your typical conservative is he and you had to go all the way to China to find him. Okay, that's one, so who's two?

Reply
Apr 16, 2021 04:29:30   #
SSDD
 
PeterS wrote:
You mean the Chinese Canadian? He's not your typical conservative is he and you had to go all the way to China to find him. Okay, that's one, so who's two?


Strict Mom, Just discovered her tonight and she appears to be a moderate Conservative.

Reply
Apr 16, 2021 18:15:06   #
PeterS
 
SSDD wrote:
Strict Mom, Just discovered her tonight and she appears to be a moderate Conservative.

I have no clue what you are trying to tell me...

Reply
Apr 16, 2021 20:56:50   #
SSDD
 
PeterS wrote:
I have no clue what you are trying to tell me...


You asked ONE question, I answered ONE question

PeterS wrote:
You mean the Chinese Canadian? He's not your typical conservative is he and you had to go all the way to China to find him. question---->Okay, that's one, so who's two?<----question


SSDD wrote:
Name of an OPP poster ---->Strict Mom<----name of an OPP poster, Just discovered her tonight and she appears to be a moderate Conservative.


Now do you have a clue what I was saying?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 11 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.