PoliticalOrphan wrote:
It's also wrong to say that a 40 hr.+ overtime requirement is a moot point. If companies could work present employees 70 hrs. a week at straight time, they would never create new jobs, and pay for the benefits of new employees.
mmccarty12 wrote:
Many employers are cutting back to part-time only employees due to the "wonderful" institution of Obamacare.
It is not wrong to say that the 40+ hour overtime pay requirement is moot when employers are cutting back on full-time employees and cutting employee hours to less than 40 hours. The law is still in place for those times when an employer does require an employee, part-time or full-time, to work over 40 hours when it comes to over-time pay, which is what my comment was about, if not clearly stated for you.
PoliticalOrphan wrote:
As far as the comp time question goes, I have had some experience with it, and it will never be good, no matter how it's written.
So you are telling me that the feds would not impose some sort of penalty on employers for not allowing the use of comp time?
If the employer gives an employee comp time in lieu of overtime pay, the government is denied tax dollars.
If the employer allows the employee to use the comp time, the government is denied tax dollars.
If the employer gives the comp time but does not allow the employee to use it, the government is denied tax dollars.
As I have not read the bill and really have no desire to read it, I am salaried so get screwed anyway,
Especially since the government is not getting anything from the denial of use of comp time and nothing from the institution of comp time if the legislation is passed. They are not collecting taxes from over-time pay. And we all know how the government loves to eke out all the tax money they can get, deserved or no.
I imply US Workers working in US companies on US soil, and you through Bangladesh out. Another country, another set of rules and while not totally applicable, is about 95% inapplicable. The only reason US companies move overseas for cheap labor is the American consumer refuses to see what is going on. Again, if it is a bad company, endorsing bad practices, STOP purchasing the goods and services.
And if I am living in such a fantasy land, why do so many people still believe c*******m and/or socialism is a great way to govern the people when we have world-wide proof that in those governments, only the governors are better off, and the governed always end up in a state worse than before the new government came into power?
Looking back at history, even a representative republic is bound to fail when the citizenry stop taking an interest in what their governors are doing. As it was the closest thing to what we have, look at Rome.