One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Our Supreme Court Goes Full Nicaragua in PA Election Case
Feb 23, 2021 06:57:42   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, and what it started with the Texas rejection, is that election laws and procedures cannot be challenged beyond a state court, at any time, regardless of how badly those states shred the United States Constitution, and regardless of the major consequences to the other 49 states as a result. They don’t ever say that per se, but the results of what those two rulings have done are just that. Period.

Those trying to challenge Pennsylvania’s obviously corrupt and rigged election system have been told that they cannot challenge the laws ahead of the election, because there is not yet a victim. They’ve been told that fellow Americans impacted by Pennsylvania’s corrupt system cannot challenge, because of standing. Now they’ve been told that they cannot challenge after the election, because it’s after the election - and therefore moot."
.........
"One wonders what this Court waits for,” understates Thomas in his dissent, adding “we failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

And that friends, is a wrap.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/02/our_supreme_court_goes_full_nicaragua_in_pa_election_case.html

| Reply
Feb 23, 2021 07:12:07   #
Liberty Tree
 
ACP45 wrote:
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, and what it started with the Texas rejection, is that election laws and procedures cannot be challenged beyond a state court, at any time, regardless of how badly those states shred the United States Constitution, and regardless of the major consequences to the other 49 states as a result. They don’t ever say that per se, but the results of what those two rulings have done are just that. Period.

Those trying to challenge Pennsylvania’s obviously corrupt and rigged election system have been told that they cannot challenge the laws ahead of the election, because there is not yet a victim. They’ve been told that fellow Americans impacted by Pennsylvania’s corrupt system cannot challenge, because of standing. Now they’ve been told that they cannot challenge after the election, because it’s after the election - and therefore moot."
.........
"One wonders what this Court waits for,” understates Thomas in his dissent, adding “we failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

And that friends, is a wrap.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/02/our_supreme_court_goes_full_nicaragua_in_pa_election_case.html
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, a... (show quote)


With the exception of a few the SCOTUS has been intimidated by fear of the extreme left. Roberts is owned by some group and he drags others with him. Of course, the liberal court members will always side with the Democrats.

| Reply
Feb 23, 2021 07:18:15   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
ACP45 wrote:
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, and what it started with the Texas rejection, is that election laws and procedures cannot be challenged beyond a state court, at any time, regardless of how badly those states shred the United States Constitution, and regardless of the major consequences to the other 49 states as a result. They don’t ever say that per se, but the results of what those two rulings have done are just that. Period.

Those trying to challenge Pennsylvania’s obviously corrupt and rigged election system have been told that they cannot challenge the laws ahead of the election, because there is not yet a victim. They’ve been told that fellow Americans impacted by Pennsylvania’s corrupt system cannot challenge, because of standing. Now they’ve been told that they cannot challenge after the election, because it’s after the election - and therefore moot."
.........
"One wonders what this Court waits for,” understates Thomas in his dissent, adding “we failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

And that friends, is a wrap.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/02/our_supreme_court_goes_full_nicaragua_in_pa_election_case.html
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, a... (show quote)


They shirked their duty and obligation in defending and defining the Constitution they were appointed to do..Quite pathetic really...

Thomas is right, they choose politics over responsibility of their duty..

I have no respect for any of them and wrote telling them of the mockery they allowed and created... Not that it matters to them but it did and does to me!

| Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2021 07:56:30   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
lindajoy wrote:
They shirked their duty and obligation in defending and defining the Constitution they were appointed to do..Quite pathetic really...

Thomas is right, they choose politics over responsibility of their duty..

I have no respect for any of them and wrote telling them of the mockery they allowed and created... Not that it matters to them but it did and does to me!


Good idea LJ. More should do the same. The squeaky wheel is the one that gets the grease.

| Reply
Feb 23, 2021 09:12:47   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
ACP45 wrote:
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, and what it started with the Texas rejection, is that election laws and procedures cannot be challenged beyond a state court, at any time, regardless of how badly those states shred the United States Constitution, and regardless of the major consequences to the other 49 states as a result. They don’t ever say that per se, but the results of what those two rulings have done are just that. Period.

Those trying to challenge Pennsylvania’s obviously corrupt and rigged election system have been told that they cannot challenge the laws ahead of the election, because there is not yet a victim. They’ve been told that fellow Americans impacted by Pennsylvania’s corrupt system cannot challenge, because of standing. Now they’ve been told that they cannot challenge after the election, because it’s after the election - and therefore moot."
.........
"One wonders what this Court waits for,” understates Thomas in his dissent, adding “we failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

And that friends, is a wrap.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/02/our_supreme_court_goes_full_nicaragua_in_pa_election_case.html
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, a... (show quote)


How many times do we have to cover this? The Constitution is quite clear, it gives States the SOLE authority to conduct and manage elections.

| Reply
Feb 23, 2021 10:37:46   #
kemmer
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
With the exception of a few the SCOTUS has been intimidated by fear of the extreme left. Roberts is owned by some group and he drags others with him. Of course, the liberal court members will always side with the Democrats.

Trumpies are shocked! They thought that with Trump's people on the SCOTUS, their troubles were over. They forgot one thing: these people are judges and not the type of mindless weasel Lindsey Graham turned out to be.

| Reply
Feb 23, 2021 16:47:39   #
Sicilianthing
 
ACP45 wrote:
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, and what it started with the Texas rejection, is that election laws and procedures cannot be challenged beyond a state court, at any time, regardless of how badly those states shred the United States Constitution, and regardless of the major consequences to the other 49 states as a result. They don’t ever say that per se, but the results of what those two rulings have done are just that. Period.

Those trying to challenge Pennsylvania’s obviously corrupt and rigged election system have been told that they cannot challenge the laws ahead of the election, because there is not yet a victim. They’ve been told that fellow Americans impacted by Pennsylvania’s corrupt system cannot challenge, because of standing. Now they’ve been told that they cannot challenge after the election, because it’s after the election - and therefore moot."
.........
"One wonders what this Court waits for,” understates Thomas in his dissent, adding “we failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.”

And that friends, is a wrap.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/02/our_supreme_court_goes_full_nicaragua_in_pa_election_case.html
"What the Supreme Court codified yesterday, a... (show quote)


>>>

So sad !

Just more bad stuff coming down the pipe !

| Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2021 IDF International Technologies, Inc.