MAGA M*****as can add these t*****rs to their lists... 6 Clowns in Gowns have delivered more damage in refusing to listen to the E******n F***d Cases than all other cases since Gay Marriage !


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


JUDICIARY
Justice Clarence Thomas Dissents From Supreme Court on E******n Case: ‘We Need to Make It Clear’
BY: JACK PHILLIPS
February 22, 2021
Epoch Times

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion regarding the high court’s decision not to take up a case challenging the Pennsylvania Nov. 3 e******n results.

The court on Monday announced it won’t take up lawsuits challenging a Pennsylvania state court decision that relaxed b****t-integrity measures, including a move to extend the b****t-receipt deadline during the November e******n by three days due to the CCP (Chinese C*******t Party) v***s. Former President Donald Trump and Pennsylvania’s GOP urged the court to take up a review of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling.

“This is not a prescription for confidence,” Thomas wrote on Monday, adding that “changing the rules in the middle of the game is bad enough.” Thomas, considered by many to be the most conservative justice, said the court should have granted a review.

“That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few b****ts to change the outcome of any federal e******n. But that may not be the case in the future,” Thomas wrote (pdf). “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set e******n rules, and to do so well before the next e******n cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

Other than Thomas, Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch also dissented.

“If state officials have the authority they have claimed, we need to make it clear. If not, we need to put an end to this practice now before the consequences become catastrophic,” Thomas, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, also wrote.

Thomas also appeared to make a reference to allegations of fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 e******n.

“We are fortunate that many of the cases we have seen alleged only improper rule changes, not fraud,” Thomas wrote. “But that observation provides only small comfort. An e******n free from strong evidence of systemic fraud is not alone sufficient for e******n confidence. Also important is the assurance that fraud will not go undetected.”

The Supreme Court on Monday also declined to review a bid by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and others who asked the court to strike down a policy that expanded mail-in b****ts.

A lawyer for Kelly, Greg Teufel, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last week that “it’s important the court should take an interest in whether Pennsylvania’s e******n laws are administered constitutionally or not, and in accordance with the Pennsylvania constitution and with the federal constitution.” Teufel noted that before the court’s decision on Monday, there was a slim chance of the justices taking it up.

Trump still has a request on the Supreme Court docket regarding his challenge to changes that the Wisconsin E******n Commission ordered last year.

=============
I was happy when president Trump had selected Kavanaugh and Barrett for the SC. But I think I was wrong. I think someone's influence or decision had made them turned their back against the president who put them on that position. I think that was ungrateful. The constitution must be their guideline not politics.

They have violated the constitution, so as the other 6 among them. Only 3 of them Carson, Alito, and Gorsuch are constitutional and with integrity and respect.

I am not sure if I could gain my trust and confidence on Barrett, and Kavanaugh again.